Pros And Cons Of College Athletes Get Paid

347 Words1 Page

This is an argument you can find anywhere. ESPN, Sports Center, and even on your local news channel, college athletes getting paid is more of an argument then most people think. Some people usually jump to conclusions, “They shouldn’t get paid!”or “Aren’t full ride scholarships enough?” Well, there are many more facts and statements to go with this. It can be a major topic to argue about, because there are really some good counter arguments to change people's ideas, including me. Usually some colleges can’t afford it, supposedly, and that the pride and heart of the athletes are lost because money overcomes on where they are and what they do. Maybe that could be a topic, but it would be great to pay for the best in the league, have it more competitive, and to have more than one team, instead of Alabama, win a championship throughout the years. …show more content…

Depending on who the person is and really who’s running the show, colleges and universities are also about academics and not only athletics, this could be a struggle of finding “Student Athletes”. Maybe they should get paid because kids with learning problems or if their education systems aren’t good enough can’t get the good grades, but maybe decent ones, just to get into the colleges with scholarships. Sports may not be a big deal for some people but it is the only thing some people have. Some kids have early families, payments to make, or even might want to have their own business. Jobs aren’t easy to come by but if they get paid then this can help them not only financially but with the rest of their lives. The subject of how college athletes can get paid or not is hard because there are good things and bad things that can happen and there are explanations behind that, although, coming up ways to pay them is a very difficult

Open Document