Profession Of Arms Essay

In 2010, Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) published and distributed, The Profession of Arms, a white paper designed to facilitate an Army-wide dialog on what it meant to serve in our profession of arms. In many aspects, the paper’s objective was to initiate the conversation on “getting back to the basics” and addressing the perceived lowering of standards among the junior leaders and enlisted soldiers. After nine years of non-stop fighting in two theaters of operations, the Army wanted to ensure it was still capable of self-policing its force on both the battlefield and in garrison, consistently taking care of its soldiers and their families, and junior leaders received the opportunities to maximize their talents in future assignments. This brief paper looks to address the role and importance of the Human Resources (HR) Sergeant in the Profession of Arms. However, one cannot properly do so without first discussing what it means to be a profession, exploring the Army’s professional culture, and understanding the balancing role of the Army’s professional leaders. Until the above three topics have been dissected, the importance of the HR Sergeant in the Profession of Arms cannot

Lastly, professions earn the trust of their clients through trust and a self-policing ethic. Ethic, as defined in the white paper, is the professional’s “means of motivation and self-control.” In essence, a profession or professional’s motivation for continuing their work is not based on extrinsic factors such as salary, benefits, and promotions, rather such things like the life-long pursuit of knowledge in their field, the satisfaction and pride in their service, and the camaraderie among its fellow