Power Elite Theory Vs Big Business

564 Words2 Pages

In society, there is also an argument on what theory is correct, and works better for a city. Regime or Elite theory? Both has different stand point, but the main difference is should big businesses run local governments, or where the regime theory believes businesses are not very powerful. This has been a constant battle for years and both sides make great arguments. The power elite theory argues that “big business” and other behind-the-scenes notables effectively control local arena (Levine, 2015). In urban areas people tend to vote for more elite candidates. Power elite theory views urban politics as extremely undemocratic. Upper class rules what cities do, and the class function of birth, ownership, wealth, old money families, etc. Political and civil leaders beholden to upper class. Single, homogeneous power-elite rules city. They have influence over multiple policy spheres, more so in national politics, since there are no vehicles to represent lower status claims (e.g. parties) (Dr. Taylor). …show more content…

The upper class have the resources to participate, information on politics. Motivation (economic) to participate, access (formal and social) to officials, and contributions in campaigns. This theory also gives private investors many privileges. They can make decisions that increase/decrease land value, cities built on private capitals, fiscal health depends on private investment, bond ratings are based on fiscal health, and they can borrow for school constitutions, etc. The power of the elite is reflected in what cities do not do, example of this is, unemployment compensations, income taxes, and social services (Dr.

Open Document