Comparing Plato's Crito And Sophocles Antigone

1437 Words3 Pages

Morality of Immoral Laws
In “Crito” and “Antigone,” Plato and Sophocles both talk about disobeying the law. Plato claims that it is wrong to disobey the law when the individual will gain something from his disobedience. On the other hand, Sophocles argues that it is wrong to disobey laws that do not follow the laws of God. While I agree with Plato and Sophocles in regards to their concepts of the law, I claim that Socrates and Plato would both agree that it is not right to follow an immoral law; it is better to break an immoral law than to follow it.
If a law goes against an individual 's morals, one should break it. When Antigone talks with Kreon, she knows that burying her brother is ethically wrong, but it was morally right because she thought her brother deserved a proper burial. “And yet, as men’s hearts know, I have done no wrong, I have not sinned before God. Or if I have, I shall know the truth in death. But if the guilt lies upon Kreon who judged me, then, I pray, may his punishment equal my own” (308 66-69). Here, Antigone says that she did nothing wrong, and everyone …show more content…

She said that if she didn’t choose to bury Polyneices, she would have felt awful about it. Overall, Antigone felt just about her decision to go against Kreon’s edict and bury her brother. I say that difficult decisions shape a person’s identity because the decisions show who a person is and how they express themselves. In Oregon, among other states, doctor assisted suicide is legal. There are questions in regard to the morality of this. It is essentially ending a person’s life early; however, they will be suffering for the last part of their life. If doctors were to end a person’s life early, the question is, how would they feel, and would they think it is right. The people of Thebes had the same question the doctors have about the morality of Antigone’s

Open Document