In some special conditions, the mother’s rights has been violated. Abortion might be a way to defend herself. People should consider abortion at this time because both the mother and the fetus have the same right to live. In conclusion, abortion should not be considered constitutional as normal request. People should not be allowed to abort when they want a convenient way to get rid of
She then reconstructs the initial argument to state that it is morally impermissible to abort a fetus if it has the right to life and has the right to the mother?s body. The fetus has the right to life but only has the right to a ... ... middle of paper ... ...ould assure the survival of twin A. I feel that Thomson?s argument was easily refuted although it was very imaginative and clever. It doesn?t seem that her idea of abortion only being wrong in the case of voluntary pregnancy will hold water too long. In my personal opinion I feel that abortion is generally wrong. I think that if the woman became pregnant through consensual sex, even if she did not want to have a child, abortion is wrong regardless of the contraceptive precautions that were exercised.
and pro-choice (the fetus is not human being also woman should have right to decide) In this paper I will focus on mother-fetus relationships and Marquis’ argument for abortion is seriously wrong, afterward state I will explain why I think he made a successful argument and present my reasons for pro-life. Also, I will follow up with one of objection about human right for fetus and then respond my thinking to the objection. Abortion is referring to the procedure of artificial terminated the pregnancy. Generally speaking, the main reason for abortion is to prevent the fetus’ birth from considering mother’s health or self-decision. I agreed with Don Marquis’ argument.
A woman may decide to put herself in the position to seek an abortion, not because she wants to, but because it is the best choice for her. There are many acceptable reasons for deciding to terminate a pregnancy, which could be violence. A woman may have been in a violent relationship and was forced to have sexual intercourse, or could have been raped by someone they did not personally know. If that was a woman’s situation, she should not have to go through the pregnancy when she wasn’t planning to have a baby. Health complications can occur during pregnancy with the woman or the fetus.
What it all boils down to is if a mother should be allowed to abort her baby or not. Also if she is allowed to when is the baby considered a human being and why is she being allowed to kill it without any repercussions that would normally come along with murder. Many people believe that the mother has the sole right to abort her baby whenever she wants to, and for whatever reasons. Others believe that even though she has the right to abort her pregnancy that at some point the baby has a heartbeat, and she should not
Abortion is wrong but should be allowed. In cases like rape, incest, income, and age, women should have a right to have an abortion. There are other choices that could be made like adoption, however carrying the womb isn’t easy. Women should have the right to choose if they want an abortion. The women would have their reasons to terminate the baby.
This perpetual emotional trauma might even result in her unwillingness to properly take appropriate care... ... middle of paper ... ... of homicide: one count for the mother and one count for the developing fetus. However, the issue of abortion brings the fetus’ liberties under scrutiny. The fetus’s mother ultimately has been deemed to have a superior right to her body than the fetus has to life. To protect mothers from unwanted pregnancies, and unwanted fetuses from substandard living conditions, a ruling was made that gave women the freedom to chose whether or not to continue with unwanted pregnancies. Like anything else within the so-called “moral grey area”, there are consequences that are implicit in either choice.
B. Women should have abortions when they want to terminate an unwanted pregnancy and the fetus has serious physical defects. A rule utilitarian would try to answer the same question, which rule will produce more total well-being? In conclusion, a choice needs to be available to prevent the birth of unwanted children, to avoid damage to the child as well as the well-being of women. Preservation of life seems to be a slogan for anti-abortionists.
The Concept of Abortion "Abortion is never justified" I neither agree or disagree with this statement. I mostly disagree with the concept of abortion, but in some cases I feel it is morally acceptable. For example, if the mother has been raped then having the child would only remind her of the unfortunate incident and she may never be able to love her child in the same way she would with a child who was conceived normally. I also believe that abortion is morally acceptable if the mothers life is in danger if she has the baby. Although a baby is a new life, I think the mother should put herself first in that situation.
The mother's health risks would increase and the baby fetus receives death. Both lead to a negative outcome and if the mother carried the child, both would live a healthy, risk free life. Aside from the negative effects of an abortion, Women have the right to a safe and legal termination. Women should have complete control over this decision because the have to deal with the pregnancy and sacrifices, they should be able to choose what they want to do with their own body. This is shown in the article, “The Right to Safe Legal Abortion,” where Tim Anderson strongly agrees that an abortion must be an option for a woman and should be a fundamental right.