Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of corporal punishment on children
Effects of physical punishment on a child
Issue of corporal punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of corporal punishment on children
Parenting is one of the most elaborate responsibilities for human beings as it requires full attention of adults to be attentive with their children. Many aspects of parenting are embedded from tradition which involves the same teachings from past experience as to how children should be raised. Although this does create a foundation of education for parents, some methods taught down can also be controversial as some methods are not developmentally appropriate for children. One of the most controversial and heated discussions within parenting is the idea of corporal punishment, where parents are using physical harm as a form of discipline for their children. Even though parents across the globe still practice this method as it is the way they …show more content…
With corporal punishment, the thought process behind this method is to ignite the fear with the use of physical harm from any action from a child that is deemed wrong. For anyone in general, the thought of getting hurt over something that can be prevented is a lesson within itself. However, children are not at the same thinking capacity as adults as it hinders them to actually process what is happening. “Physical punishment can work momentarily to stop problematic behavior because children are afraid of being hit, but it doesn’t work in the long term and can make children more aggressive” (Smith ). The purpose of disciplining is meant to be a teaching lesson that later on is not needed because the child has learn learned from the past. However, with physical harm being used, children only stop the issue for the moment, when they do not know the purpose as to why the issues was in the wrong. Research also should evidence of aggressive behavior leading into lack of coping skills because of what is observed through parents that are actively responding to problematic behavio0r this way (Jones). Instead of focusing on stopping the behavior for a moment, parents should reflect at the fact that corporal punishment is actually hindering the development of their child as it creates them to learn behaviors that are not foreseen from punishment that is …show more content…
Spanking is one of the most common methods of corporal punishment, as it is the most talked about topics new parents discuss when thinking about disciplining. The idea behind spanking is to use with force whether if its with a hand or object, to ignite fear of getting hurt again from a behavior that is seen wrong. However, for some children, this does not translate well as it actually creates a misconception as to why they are getting hurt from their loved ones. Not only does it translate wrong to the child, but it translates wrong in the future as to any behavior that is seen wrong, physical harm should be present. Research shows that spanking leads to children learning that abuse is necessary to get what they want and hurt others (Jones). The issue behind this is the thought of hurting other loved ones, such as future children, family, or even spouses. Many parents believe that th4ey are helping their children with this method of parenting, but it is actually hurting their children as they are teaching a hidden behavior that is not said, but
Swat! The entire store tries not to stare at the overwhelmed mother spanking her three-year-old whaling son. As if the screaming tantrum wasn't enough of a side show at the supermarket. This method, or technique perhaps, has been around for decades, even centuries. Generations have sat on grandpa’s lap and listened to the stories of picking their own switch or getting the belt after pulling off a devilish trick. So why then has it become a major controversy in the past few decades? The newest claim is that spanking and other forms of physical punishment can lead to increased aggression, antisocial behavior, physical injury and mental health problems for children. Brendan L. Smith uses many case studies and psychologists findings in his article “The Case Against Spanking” to suggest that parents refrain from physically punishing their children due to lasting harmful effects.
There are parents who are not patient enough to try and discipline their children in other ways, and when their children act up the only way that the parent knows how to react is by physically abusing them. This is definitely the wrong choice in disciplining their children. This can be the cause of emotional or behavioral problems, according to the studies from developmental psychologist Elizabeth Gershoff. If a parent decides to take this action of discipline to their children studies have shown that children experience increased anxiety, fear, it hinders the development of compassion for others, aggression towards others, unintended harm to themselves, and decreases self-esteem. Not only is physical abuse hurtful to children, but they can suffer emotionally and they grow up thinking that it is acceptable to be a physical towards others. These types of emotions are something that teenagers should not experience. This type of discipline can also come with severe consequences for the parents. If a teacher or someone suspects that a child is being physically abused, they have the right to contact the police department. The police department then can contact CPS (child protective services) who is able to conduct and start an investigation. If the parent is found guilty, they can be placed under arrest and CPS is able to take their children away and the child will be placed into foster care. This can turn out to be a very serious situation. Some studies that Professor George Bear researched show that foster care cannot be as safe as the government believes it can be. Some children from foster care do not like the home they are placed in and they run away from that home. When they run away they can do bad things such as drugs, drink, or even face the danger of getting kidnapped. Parents do not think of the harm that they
Darcia begins her writing by first defining spanking as “hitting a child on the bottom with an open hand.” She then illustrates situations in which many parents may warrant the need for spanking. She follows with multiple examples of the negative effects of corporal punishment on the developing children ranging from increased aggression in retaliation to lack of trust
What do most people believe to be true about the topic? Spanking is the only resource that is most effective. Yet, there are several other types of punishments that can be used in place of spanking. In my opinion, spanking is not the most effective means of punishment. We tell kids growing up that “violence is never the answer” so why should violence, because technically speaking that is what spanking is, be the answer? Why not try to get a child to understand that their actions were wrong in a more non-violent way and not contradict ourselves. What are you trying to instill in your child, fear or violence because either one of those you will accomplish. Other than just the pain taking place during the spanking, the child could also experience
Corporal punishment is a traditional practice of imposing pain, which is commonly used by parents towards children to remove an unpleasant behavior. It is also a physical force towards a child for the purpose of control, and as a disciplinary penalty inflicted on the body. The parents play a pivotal role in honing and disciplining their child with regards to his/her actions. Hitting them with physical objects and forcing them to do cleaning works are some of the ways of discipline, which were done at home. In the year 2000, research, the convention, and law reform – modified the punishment towards children. According to research, 20,000 people in the U.S – particularly those who are 20 years old and above, 1,258 experienced punishment by pushing, grabbing, slapping and hitting. 19,349 people had been reported that they didn’t experience such kind of punishment. Moreover, it is also executed on the children, in order for them to act independently and to visualize the negativities of being careless and dependent to others. Punishment is also
Finally, we need to know more about the personal resources of parents that can lessen the incidence of spanking. It is found that spanking sharply decreases as the parent ages. Despite ideological motivations, parents can and should be trained to understand alternative strategies of discipline (Day 93).
The use of spanking is one of the most controversial parenting practices and also one of the oldest, spanning throughout many generations. Spanking is a discipline method in which a supervising adult deliberately inflicts pain upon a child in response to a child’s unacceptable behaviour. Although spanking exists in nearly every country and family, its expression is heterogeneous. First of all the act of administering a spanking varies between families and cultures. As Gershoff (2002) pointed out, some parents plan when a spanking would be the most effective discipline whereas some parents spank impulsively (Holden, 2002). Parents also differ in their moods when delivering this controversial punishment, some parents are livid and others try and be loving and reason with the child. Another source of variation is the fact that spanking is often paired with other parenting behaviours such as, scolding, yelling, or perhaps raging and subsequently reasoning. A third source of variation concerns parental characteristics. Darling and Steinberg (1993) distinguished between the content of parental acts and the style in which it was administered (Holden, 2002). With all this variation researchers cannot definitively isolate the singular effects of spanking.
Living in the twenty-first century you rarely ever see someone spank their child or hear the word spank come out of a parent’s mouth. I see too many parents today that are too self-righteous to spank their children, because many people see spanking as form of abuse. Many parents in today’s world use more reasonable punishments for their misbehaving children. Some parents put their children in time-outs, relieve them of their freedom, take toys away and ground them. I’ve see parents use these methods because there are more reasonable ways of punishing their child for being disobedient.
According to Bianca Mgbemere and Rachel Telles, the kind of parenting can provide the healthiest environment for a child (2013). We understand the concept that children need to be loved, taught, reassured, and even punished at times. While growing up, my parents use to tell us that the punishment always hurt them more than it did us. Of course, I was thinking that they were crazy because they were not sitting on my end of things.
The constant rage and spanking towards the child affect the way they feel and how they perceive themselves around others. Authoritative parenting “encourages children to be independent but still place limits and controls on their actions” (p.249). This allows the child to have freedom but to a certain extent. They have a list of rules that are given and all of them must be followed. If they did something they knew was wrong, their parents would sit down and discuss the issue with them.
“It hurts and it’s painful inside – it’s like breaking your bones; it’s loud and sore, and it stings; it feels like you’ve been adopted or something and you’re not part of their family; you feel like you don’t like your parents anymore; you feel upset because they are hurting you, and you love them so much, and then all of a sudden they hit you and you feel as though they don’t care about you” (Pritchard 9). These are the feelings of those juveniles who suffer from corporal punishment. Corporal punishment has been one of the main topics of research in Psychology in last few decades. Although people had believed, “Spare the rod and spoil the child” but in the present age of science, research has revealed that the corporal punishment causes more harm to the children instead of having a positive effect on them. According to UNICEF, “Corporal punishment is actually the use of physical measures that causes pain but no wounds, as a means of enforcing discipline” (1). It includes spanking, squeezing, slapping, pushing and hitting by hand or with some other instruments like belts etc. But it is different from physical abuse in which punishment result in wounds and the objective is different from teaching the discipline. Although Corporal punishment is considered to be a mode of teaching discipline and expeditious acquiescence, however, it leads to the disruption of parent-child relationship, poor mental health of juveniles, moral internalization along with their anti-social and aggressive behaviour and it is against the morality of humans.
Corporal punishment is effective in the short-term, but other alternatives, based more on learning theory, are more effective in long-term behavioural modification. The media, such as Time magazine, discusses the issue of corporal punishment using emotive language and vague claims, as opposed to empirical evidence and references to surveys. Therefore, this essay seeks to discuss the effectiveness of corporal punishment, and learning theory alternatives, through analysing research studies and credited analyses.
Corporal punishment is the physical disciplinary method used by parents, teachers, and school administrators in an effort to correct a child’s undesirable behaviors. The use of physical force is one that is often times controversial and usually evokes very strong reactions. These feelings surface, and opposing views clash, when scandals surrounding corporal punishment hit the media and heated arguments in the comments section of articles emerge. While corporal punishment occasionally makes its way into the limelight, it is a decision all parents are faced with eventually and often times daily. For example, when a toddler is sprawled out on the grocery store floor kicking, hitting, and flinging