On Women's Right To Vote By Susan B Anthony Analysis

517 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Influence of Mahatma Gandhi

Civil disobedience is the refusal to follow or demand laws or rules. Taking a stand on issues of justice in society may be important or redundant to many individuals. In my case, taking a stand on issues of justice is important. Individuals take a stand on justice so they can change issues, speak for people who can’t speak for themselves, and fight for what they believe in. Individuals stand up to justice to change inequitable laws and issues. According to Susan B. Anthony’s speech “On Women’s Right to Vote”, it states “women are citizens, and no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce any old laws, that shall abridge their privileges or immunities.” Anthony wanted to change an unfair issue. Women could not vote nor was given any freedom of speech. She took a stand against justice and eventually led to the changings of this outrageous law, and providing an example of the importance of taking a stand. …show more content…

One way is to smash the head of the man who perpetrates injustice and to get your own head smashed in the process.” Gandhi said there are two ways to right a wrong, a violent route or a non-violent route. He chose the non-violent route and spoke for the people who could not. In his speech “On Civil Disobedience”, it says “But so long as there is yet life i these our bones, we will never comply with your arbitrary laws”. Gandhi represented the individuals that thought the laws were illogical and unreasonable, and said they would not obey these discriminatory rules. By Gandhi speaking for many other people, proves the importance of taking a stand, even if it is a non-violent

Show More
Related

  • Susan B Anthony On Women's Right To Vote Analysis

    162 Words  | 1 Pages

    Literary Focus Statement: In Susan B. Anthony’s zealous speech “On Women’s Right to Right to Vote”, she

    Read More

  • Women's Suffrage in American History

    680 Words  | 2 Pages

    This movement which was inspired by the ideologies of courageous women and fueled by their enthusiasm and sacrifice is often unacknowledged by most historians in the chronicles of American History. Today the movement is often misunderstood as a passive, white upper class, naive cause. But a deeper study would reveal that the women’s suffrage movement was the one that brought together the best and brightest women in America, which not only changed the lives of half the citizens of United States but also changed the social attitudes of millions of Americans.

    Read More

  • The Power of Nonviolent Resistance (NVR)

    1378 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gandhi once said “An eye for an eye and the whole world is blind.” This is true in most circumstances but there are exceptions. By comparing acts of nonviolent civil disobedience with acts of violent civil disobedience it is apparent that force or violence is only necessary to combat violence but never if it effects the lives of the innocent. A recurrent theme in each of these examples is that there is a genuine desire to achieve equality and liberty. However, one cannot take away the liberties of others in order to gain their own. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that political change would come faster through nonviolent methods and one can not argue his results as many of the Jim Crow laws were repealed. Similarly, through nonviolent resistance Gandhi was able to eventually free India from the rule of Britain. It is true that sometimes the only way to fight violence is through violence, but as is apparent, much can be said of peaceful demonstrations in order to enact change. Thus, it is the responsibility of we as individuals to understand that nonviolence is often a more viable means to an end than violence.

    Read More

  • Susan B Anthony Women's Rights To Vote Rhetorical Analysis

    262 Words  | 1 Pages

    Susan B. Anthony's speech on Women's Rights to Vote is effective but has some flaws regarding the imbalance of the rhetorical appeals. During her speech in paragraph one she says, “ [I] simply exercised my citizens rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens.” While using the logos appeal, Anthony describes a biased opinion considering her trial. Although she is using logic, her statement is biased and can be counteracted. During the speech, Anthony uses an immense amount of pathos, while skimping on logos. Using the pathos appeal in paragraph five Anthony states, “It is an odious aristocracy; a hateful oligarchy of sex”. Throughout this whole paragraph, there is clear pathos not including the other appeals. This decreases her credibility,

    Read More

  • Rawls and King on Civil Disobedience

    773 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Theory of Justice by John Rawls, he defines civil disobedience,” I shall begin by defining civil disobedience as a public, nonviolent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government”.

    Read More

  • Paradox Of Civil Disobedience

    661 Words  | 2 Pages

    Civil Disobedience is a paradox. Civility and disobedience diametrically oppose one another; civility implies politeness or a regard to the status quo while disobedience is a refusal to submit to the standard. When these words are coupled together, however, they compliment one another. The purpose of Civil Disobedience is to disregard the obligation of observing a law with the intention of highlighting a need for change. Morality, Religion, and Ethics often play into the decision to willingly break a law which creates more depth behind the practical meaning phrase, because those three tend to emphasize a respect for authority and integrity. When people break the law in the name of civility, they often are asking questions like, “What must I

    Read More

  • Civil Disobedience In Thomas Jefferson's Letter From Birmingham Jail

    256 Words  | 1 Pages

    “...It becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another (person)...” Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence. Civil disobedience is when you exercise the right of the people and protest peacefully against the government. As we read in Jefferson’s writing, as well as Martin Luther King Jr. and Mohandas Gandhi’s. According to our great writers civil disobedience builds a great framework to promote change.

    Read More

  • Comparison of Civil Disobedience

    3701 Words  | 8 Pages

    Despite the belief that fighting with violence is effective, civil disobedience has been tried throughout history and been successful. Fighting violence with violence leaves no oppertunity for peace to work. By refusing to fight back violently, Martin Luther King Jr. took a race of people, taught them the value of their voice, and they earned the right to vote. Henry David Thoreau presented his doctrine that no man should cooperate with laws that are unjust, but, he must be willing to accept the punishment society sets for breaking those laws, and hundreds of years later, people are still inspired by his words. Mohandas K. Gandhi lead an entire country to its freedom, using only his morals and faith to guide him, as well as those who followed him, proving that one man can make a difference. Civil disobedience is the single tool that any person can use to fight for what they want, and they will be heard. After centuries of questioning it, it appears that the pen truly is mightier than the sword.

    Read More

  • Susan B Anthony Women's Right To The Suffrage Analysis

    632 Words  | 2 Pages

    “... I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizens rights.” (Anthony). Susan B. Anthony’s speech, “Women’s Right to the Suffrage,” was the most compelling speech because she informed her readers of how she didn’t break the law by casting a vote. She proves this by explaining how women are human beings whom deserve their rights, the men oppressing her are in fact the people who broke the law, and the white men have become a hate group. The central idea of her speech is that she didn’t violate a law, rather, the law violates her rights.

    Read More

  • Women's Suffrage Dbq Essay

    1066 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the 1800s, women across the world began establishing organizations to demand women’s suffrage in their countries. Today, there are still women in countries fighting for their right to vote. Some countries who’ve succeeded in the mid to late 1800s were Sweden and New Zealand. Once they expanded women’s suffrage, many other countries followed. Like Sweden, countries first granted limited suffrage to women and other countries approved to the full national level. Additionally, there were quite a few countries who had taken over a century to give women the right to vote, Qatar being a prime example. Although the fight for women’s suffrage varied in the United States, France, and Cuba in terms of length and process, each effort ultimately

    Read More

  • Civil Disobedience And Letter From Birmingham Jail By Martin Luther King Jr.

    799 Words  | 2 Pages

    Justice is often misconceived as injustice, and thus some essential matters that require more legal attentions than the others are neglected; ergo, some individuals aim to change that. The principles of civil disobedience, which are advocated in both “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau and “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr. to the society, is present up to this time in the U.S. for that purpose.

    Read More

  • Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

    1240 Words  | 3 Pages

    Civil disobedience is the active, professed refusal to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of a government, or of an occupying international power. Many of this protests were led by some greatest people who

    Read More

  • Essay On Civil Disobedience

    1445 Words  | 3 Pages

    ​The definition of civil disobedience is a form of protest in which protesters deliberately violate the law (Suber, 1999). Civil disobedience can be shown in many different ways and is also used for many different reasons. Civil disobedience can be caused by democracy, used for murder excuses, government hacking, deportation and equal rights. Some say there is no way to justify civil disobedience while others think it is necessary in some cases. People choose civil disobedience because they feel it's the best way to get the attention they need for their cause. These people see it as the practical way to go about fighting for their cause without actually using violence. While some people who act upon civil disobedience do turn to violence, that doesn't mean that want to, they just think it's their only option.

    Read More

  • Civil Disobedience: We The Students

    620 Words  | 2 Pages

    Civil disobedience is important because it hold the government more accountable for their actions. Over time it has help establish a stronger justice system in America. The practice of civil disobedience is “breaking the law for a justifiable

    Read More

  • Segregation

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    Civil Disobedience- Civil Disobedience is the refusal to follow a law(s) or a system that is required to be followed or is followed by the general population. In reference to The American Civil Rights Movement, civil disobedience is when African-Americans would protest to laws and treatments that were unfair to them, such as, African-Americans being segregated and treated as second-class citizens. In W...

    Read More

More about On Women's Right To Vote By Susan B Anthony Analysis

Open Document