Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on sickle cell aneamia with malaria
The importance of the human genome in science
Essay on sickle cell aneamia with malaria
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on sickle cell aneamia with malaria
How is this book organized? Why do you think the author organized the material this way?
The book is organized by subjects and time. Each subject supports the hypothesis that human civilization accelerated human evolution. For each supporting subject, the authors write in a chronological fashion, providing the general background of the topic (ex. history of hunting and gathering to agriculture). As a result, the reader understands how the authors came to their conclusion and how the facts they presented supported the hypothesis.
How did the table of contents and index help you use this book?
The table of contents and index was helpful when locating a certain topic in the book. In addition, there was a glossary that was very useful. The book used many biology terms that I did not understand, so it was useful being able to locate any vocabulary I did not know in the back of the book.
What sections of the book did you want to read first? Why?
At the first glance of the table of contents, I wanted to read, “Medieval Evolution: How the Ashkenazi Jews got their Smarts”. This chapter interested me the most because the title made me wonder if the Ashkenazi Jews were a lot smarter than the rest of us.
What part of this book could the author have left out without changing your understanding of the topic?
Every part of the book is essential to understanding how human civilization accelerated human evolution. The book covers topics such as: the human expansion out of Africa, the replacement of Neanderthals, speech capabilities/advantages, gene mutations and gene flow. The topics cover the main aspects of human civilization from the beginning to the modern times. Each aspect covered explains how it encouraged gene flow, therefore advantageous ...
... middle of paper ...
...in northern Europe. I also learned that with the domestication of animals, Indo-European languages spread. The proto-Indo-Europeans were the first raise cattle for milk instead of slaughter. They were able to conquer neighboring people and spread their language because dairying instead of slaughtering cattle produces five times as many calories per acre. So, the Proto-Indo-Europeans were able to create more warriors on the same amount of land than other tribes. I also learned that some genetic mutations are a defense to certain diseases. For example, sickle cell anemia which deforms the hemoglobin is a defense against malaria, since malaria attacks hemoglobin. However, sickle cell anemia is dangerous in its own right.
What big question do you still have after reading this book?
What type of evolutions did Homo sapiens undergo before the expansion out of Africa?
In 1776, David McCullough gives a vivid portrayal of the Continental Army from October 1775 through January 1777, with sharp focus on the leadership of America’s greatest hero, George Washington. McCullough’s thesis is that had not the right man (George Washington) been leading the Continental Army in 1776, the American Revolution would have resulted in a vastly different outcome. He supports his argument with a critical analysis of Washington’s leadership during the period from the Siege of Boston, through the disastrous defense of New York City, the desperate yet, well ordered retreat through New Jersey against overwhelming odds, and concludes with the inspiring victories of Trenton and Princeton. By keeping his army intact and persevering through 1776, Washington demonstrated to the British Army that the Continental Army was not simply a gang of rabble, but a viable fighting force. Additionally, Mr. McCullough supports his premise that the key to the survival of the American Revolution was not in the defense of Boston, New York City, or any other vital terrain, but rather the survival of the Continental Army itself. A masterful piece of history, 1776 is not a dry retelling of the Revolutionary War, but a compelling character study of George Washington, as well as his key lieutenants, and his British adversaries, the most powerful Army in the 18th Century world. When I read this book, I went from a casual understanding of the hero George Washington to a more specific understanding of why Washington was quite literally the exact right man at the exact right place and time to enable the birth of the United States.
...onally transposing indirect to direct quotation, putting words into people mouths and blending two separate eye witness's accounts. How can one read a novel for knowledge gaining purposes when the structure appears so flawed? The use of modern and old English are combined in the sentence structure. The highly academic vocabulary not only is confusing, but breaks the flow of the book when that is the evident purpose for the format of the book. The confusing order in which Starkey retells events and the ineffective and useless information that is put in for building character personalities.
The parts that I found boring were when there was a lot of description going on from the author. I do realize that it is necessary to set up the scenes and locations so that us as readers can have a better understanding of what is happening in the book, however I felt like at times he went too far into detail and had me nearly sleeping at times, literally.
“The development of agriculture was a radical change in humans’ way of life.” (Stearns, 2) It set the basis for faster change in human societies. Metalworking allowed farmers to work more efficiently. The development of languages increased the chances of civilizations because people were able to communicate with each other. Record keeping and innovated technology also brought people together because they began discovering new things about the society.
...int he had before elaborating on his main idea. One thing that I really liked in the book was the beginning of the chapter Zebras and Unhappy Marriages. Diamond starts the chapter with “Domesticable animals are all alike; every undomesticable animal is undomesticable in its own way.”(Diamond 157) This sentence is based of off the famous first sentence of Tolstoy’s novel Ana Karenina. I thought that this was a clever way to start the passage and catch the reader’s attention. However, the issue I had with the book was that it was repetitive. Jared Diamond would reiterate what he had already stated earlier in the book or passage. Overall the book was well organized and well written. Jared Diamond clearly stated his thesis more than once throughout the book. He elaborated on every point he made and did a good job in convincing the reader of his standing on the topic.
This is my personal reflection about this book. First and foremost, I would like to say that this book is very thick and long to read. There are about nineteen chapters and 278 pages altogether. As a slow reader, it is a quite hard for me to finish reading it within time. It took me weeks to finish reading it as a whole. Furthermore, it is written in English version. My English is just in average so sometimes I need to refer to dictionary for certain words. Sometimes I use google translate and ask my friends to explain the meaning of certain terms.
In this book everyone knew what was going on, but nobody wanted to say anything. They knew what was going on but did nothing to prevent it. The reader on the other hand doesn’t know what is happening and only learning piece by piece each chapter. Not knowing what’s going on is tortuous for the reader but makes them want more, so they keep reading.
This paper has shown how Homo sapiens had several advantages over the Neanderthals including better diets, better tools and just better luck. The Neanderthals could not survive the harsh climates they were thrust into and eventually died out. In this paper I looked at how Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis had co-existed but the disappearance of the Neanderthal ius due in some part to the appearance of the more culturally advanced and genetically superior Homo sapiens. Although the How and Why of how Neanderthals went extinct, it is clear that Homo sapiens had a part in their demise. In the last one hundred and fifty years that we have been studying humans we have seen them come from savage brutes, to Homo sapiens respectable contemporary. If we had not gotten lucky in the past, Neanderthals could be studying us today.
Human advancement, otherwise called hominization, is the transformative procedure that prompted the development of anatomically modern humans, starting with the developmental history of primates – specifically variety Homo – and prompting the rise of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of the hominid family, the considerable gorillas. This evolutionary procedure was
From the first sentence in the book readers will most likely already be confused. Also, readers will have to go back and read paragraphs over and over again so they will be able to remember what, or whom the author is even talking about. The author tends to use words
what animals are available to a civilization?How does the development of steel affect the development of civilization?Did exposure to epidemic diseases affect the development of
1. a. The chapter is organized in a way that it is easy to follow and comprehend. The first page entails questions that the reader should consider as they read the chapter. It then goes on to give a general concept of constructivism and into more details as you read along in the chapter.
They also are clearly not trying to write a hermeneutics textbook or solve all of the world's problems with this book. As one who likes to read a book and then think slowly through it, I appreciate that the chapters are not neatly wrapped up with a 5-step process to get it all right. Rather, they clearly lay out the issues, provide some direction for how to think and grow through them, and then leave each chapter with "Questions to Ponder." I wish more authors did this.
According to Darwin and his theory on evolution, organisms are presented with nature’s challenge of environmental change. Those that possess the characteristics of adapting to such challenges are successful in leaving their genes behind and ensuring that their lineage will continue. It is natural selection, where nature can perform tiny to mass sporadic experiments on its organisms, and the results can be interesting from extinction to significant changes within a species. Human beings are no exception to biological evolution. Like other organisms around the world, humans have significantly changed over time and have developed all sorts of diverse characteristics.
There were major shifts in human development over different times of human existence, two of