Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sexual harassment in the workplace outline
Sexual harassment in the workplace outline
Sexual harassment in the workplace outline
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sexual harassment in the workplace outline
Niue is a country in the South Pacific Ocean with an estimated population of 1,190.[1] Since 1974, it has been self-governing in free association with New Zealand. [2] Niue controls its own internal affairs, while New Zealand retains responsibility for its defence and external relations[3] and is required to provide necessary economic and administrative assistance.[4]
Niue does not have a Bill of Rights guaranteeing fundamental rights or freedom from discrimination. Law relevant to human rights can be found in various pieces of ordinary legislation. Areas of concern include the rights of women, children, and persons who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT).
The Government of Niue
Contents [hide]
1 Legal framework
1.1 International obligations
1.2 Constitution
1.3 Legislation applicable to Niue
2 Human rights issues
2.1 Right to life
2.2 Electoral rights
2.3 Access to justice
2.4 Freedom of religion
2.5 Freedom of expression
2.6 Labour law
2.7 Racial discrimination
2.8 Women's rights
2.9 LGBT rights
2.10 Children's rights
2.11 Rights of persons with disabilities
3 References
4 External links
Legal framework[edit]
International obligations[edit]
During recent consultations, Niue developed Terms of Reference for a Human Rights Committee which will be responsible for examining the country's human rights obligations arising from international law.[5]
Niue is party to treaties signed and ratified by New Zealand prior to 1988,[6] including the following:[7][8]
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD)
Convention on the Elimination o...
... middle of paper ...
....[78] In 2011, the enrolment rate of primary and secondary school aged children was 100%.[79]
The use of corporal punishment at school is not expressly prohibited by law. Legislation relating to cruel treatment[80] and bodily harm[81] is not interpreted as outlawing corporal punishment.[82] Acceptance of corporal punishment in the home is "near universal".[83]
Rights of persons with disabilities[edit]
Legislation requires that children with physical or mental disabilities be educated at a "special school" or institution,[84] however Niue has no teachers with training in special needs education.[85] Also of concern is reference in the Niue Act 1966 to women and girls who are "idiots, imbeciles or of unsound mind", and the lower criminal sanction for those who sexually offend against such individuals.[86]
Niue adopted a National Policy on Disability in 2011.[87]
Dupper, David R. , and Amy E. Montgomery Dingus. "Corporal Punishment in U.S. Public Schools : A Continuing Challenge for School Social Workers." Schools and Children 30.4 (2008): 243-250. Print.
Te Ara, the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. (2012). Story: Papatuanuku- the land. Retrieved April 17, 2014, from http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/papatuanuku-the-land/page-4
Proponents of spanking bans have a tendency to label spanking as corporal punishment. They then categorize it along with many abusive activities. Psychologist Kerby Alvy explains corporal punishment as, “pinching, pulling ears and hair, shaking, slapping, smacking, spanking, swatting, hitting, kicking, punching, paddling, using switches, hair brushes, belts and ironing cords, and having children kneel on gravel or ...
“After being rebuffed by Australia, the Tuvaluans asked New Zealand to accept its 11,000 citizens, but it has not agreed to do so. ”(Brown) Tuvalu is “one-half of the way between Hawaii and Australia,” (CIA) which makes Australia a likely candidate for migration of Tuvaluans, likewise with New Zealand. However, both of these nations have denied Tuvalu accessible land for migration. “The idea of climate refugees is still something these Pacific islands are looking at, and the governments and organizations... ...
The use of corporal punishment in schools is legal in 23 states in America, and at least one million cases similar to the one above are reported per year. The practice of corporal punishment is widespread throughout the United States by both parents and teachers, however most persons in favor of this use of punishment in education are located southern states and rural areas. Supporters claim that the lack of this method of punishment in the classroom is why children fail in school (Riak 3). Corporal punishment is a problem throughout most of the country perhaps because the form of punishment is socially acceptable in the home and individuals are uneducated about the effects of corporal punishment on children. The use of corporal punishment in the classroom leads the student to further violence, damaging psychological effects, and even child abuse. Therefore, this approach to punishment should not be advocated in any school setting.
I am a supporter of Corporal Punishment. I believe that corporal punishment, when used lovingly and properly, is beneficial to a child because it is in harmony with nature itself. Consider the purpose of minor pain in a child's life and ho...
Ambiguity and uncertainty characterise New Zealand’s overall constitutional system. Along with constitutional and administrative law. Nonetheless, the phrase, “The Queen reigns but the Government rules”, stands as an overlying solid summary of it. This phrase demonstrates that as a Constitutional Monarchy, the real power actually lies within government with the support of the House of Representatives (the executive). Nonetheless, New Zealand’s legal architecture and constitutional arrangements aim to uphold elements of democracy, equality and justice. Different aspects of the overall constitutional system both allow and limit the upholding of said elements. Overall, these aspects include the three fundamental principles that dominate New Zealand’s
The Tribunal appeared be trying to allay fears that its conception of a general right might lead immediately to unlimited public expenditure or indeed a politically problematic privileging of the Māori language in the public sphere: The creation of absolute rights to use the language is however a political or judicial response to the issue (Mamari, 2011). We could go further and promote for example, the Canadian model, which requires full bilingualism in all official documents. Official recognition is one thing but popular recognition will depend upon successful establishment of a body to promote the language for both Maori people and New Zealanders as a whole, to watch over progress and suggest strategies that overcome the difficulties that are bound to arise (Mamari, 2011).
Corporal punishment among children has been around for decades. Many years ago, it was allowed for educators to punish students who were misbehaving by hitting them with a wooden paddle on their behind. As time continued to pass, it became against the law for the school employees to discipline the students who took part in misconduct. The parents became the only people with the right to discipline their children. Today, parents continue to have the right to spank their children however it is now an issue that is frowned upon by many.
The doctrine of human rights were created to protect every single human regardless of race, gender, sex, nationality, sexual orientation and other differences. It is based on human dignity and the belief that no one has the right to take this away from another human being. The doctrine states that every ‘man’ has inalienable rights of equality, but is this true? Are human rights universal? Whether human rights are universal has been debated for decades. There have been individuals and even countries that oppose the idea that human rights are for everybody. This argument shall be investigated in this essay, by: exploring definitions and history on human rights, debating on whether it is universal while providing examples and background information while supporting my hypothesis that human rights should be based on particular cultural values and finally drawing a conclusion.
New Zealand is a large island about the size of Colorado that is situated southwest of Australia, in the south Pacific. The Island is considered to belong to the volcanic “ring of fire”, that circulates the Pacific Ocean. The Island has a varied myriad of geography ranging from flat, sheep strewn plains to impressive mountains (Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, New Zealand). Along with the geography, the climate also ranges from subtropical to temperate (Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, New Zealand). The population of 4 million is mostly made up of people that claim a British ancestry, although 15% of the population classify themselves as indigenous Polynesians or Maori (Keith Jackson, “New Zealand"). More than three quarters of the population increase in the twentieth century is a result of population growth instead of immigration (Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs). The nation’s culture is also being broadened due to a resurgence of Maori culture and through globalisation. New Zealand is ruled under a Parliamentary Democracy, although it is also included as a dominion of the United Kingdom.
The UN created a charter which outlines some guiding principles regarding human rights which include, “faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person,
The Waikato region is the fourth largest region in New Zealand, It covers 2.5 million hectares and 1,138km of coastline. The Waikato region contains 11 district councils that run different areas of the region. A census conducted by Statistics New Zealand in 2006 showed that between 2001 and 2006 the population had grown 7% to 382,716 people. The region encompasses many valuable natural resources that can be accessed for energy production and recreational use.
Recently, as the value of education is increasing, corporal punishment became hot issue on the world because there is no any appropriate answer about” Should corporal punishment be for discipline?” According to a history of corporal punishment of Wikipedia, the practice was recorded as early as c 10th Century BC in Míshlê Shlomoh. Even though corporal punishment is not correct way for discipline like people usually think, how the punishment has been used so far or why?
The Treaty of Waitangi is a very important document to New Zealand. It is an agreement that was drawn up by representatives of the British Crown and Maori Hapu and Iwi. It was first signed at the Bay of Islands on February 6th, 1840. There has been a lot of debate over the years about the translation of words between the English and Te Reo Maori versions of the text and the differences in the word meaning over the who languages. In this assignment I am going to cover the rights and responsibilities that the treaty contains and an explanation of the differences in wordings and I am also going to contextualise my understanding of the differences of wording against the Maori Worldview and the Declaration of Independence.