Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Purpose and importance of food pyramid
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Purpose and importance of food pyramid
Sodium Nitrates and Nitrites, are two of the most common food additives in America. Nitrites are compounds consisting of one nitrogen atom and two oxygen atoms, while nitrates contain one nitrogen atom, and 3 oxygen atoms. These additives are most commonly used in processed meat products in order to increase shelf life and give these processed meats their distinctive red color and flavor. (UK Food Guide) Nitrates, and Nitrites are in meats such as ham, bacon, corned beef, etc. These additives stop the growth of bacterial spores that cause botulism, one of the deadliest foodborne illnesses. However, what is not always known is that these additives have been proven to be carcinogenic, meaning that consumption of too much of these kinds of processed …show more content…
For instance, how can companies who know their products are linked to cancer, still produce carcinogenic materials; what are the moral implications? The Food and Drug Administration, has set guidelines, that limit the amount of nitrites that can be used in foods, and with the help of these guidelines food companies, have begun using less sodium nitrates, and nitrites. (Food Network) However, the moral question stems farther than just creating guidelines for the adding of sodium nitrates. If the FDA allows, the use of sodium nitrates, and nitrites, in some way they are allowing Americans to get cancer, they are allowing companies to put carcinogenic materials in their products, and while the FDA doesn’t admit to allowing the use of carcinogenic material, the studies above prove, that when sodium nitrates are used in meats, they can lead to the formation of cancer. Another factor, of the usage of Sodium Nitrates, is the economic implications. Using preservatives, save companies billions of dollars in production every year. The longer the food stays fresh, the longer companies can use the, meaning that they don’t have to produce as many
—- . ”Tyson Foods: Living Food Safety." Tyson. Tyson, 28 Feb 2014. Web. 7 Apr 2014.
how it’s safe and they won’t get cancer. They manipulated the public into thinking it was safe
Ammonium nitrate, on its own, is relatively harmless in regards to explosives. Ammonium Nitrate is a secondary explosive; it requires a primary explosive for detonation. It is able to burn without detonating and can withstand shock in which primary explosives are unable to do When ammonium nitrate is mixed with fuel oil and detonated the results can be catastrophic. The Oklahoma City bombing of 1995 is evidence of the impact of a blast using ammonium nitrate and fuel oil, known as ANFO. Timothy McVeigh parked a van filled with ammonium nit...
In addition, the USDA is exposed for promoting products such as cheese, milk, and high fructose corn syrup in a fictional way. They provided no information that they were unhealthy in the
As a race, humans are easily persuaded and quick to judge others who do not follow their beliefs. This leads to people not spending time evaluating whether something has both right and wrong facets. Many highly debated issues, such as abortion, drinking-age and religion, are controversial because there are ethical arguments for each side. These ethical dilemmas are not confined to personal situations, but spread to politics, governments, and businesses as well. A highly controversial debate in business ethics is the production and distribution of tobacco products. Many people will debate that the selling and promotion of tobacco products is unethical due to the threat these products pose to consumers’ health. While this health risk is of high concern, the emotional ties that people have to this argument constrict their ability to look at both sides of the case.
Living in a world where many prefer to believe what is shown to them, rather than doing some of their own research, can lead to consequences. (Figure 1) Some people believe electronic cigarettes are a safer and healthier alternative to the actual cigarette because of how they are advertised. “Because they [e-cigs] deliver nicotine without burning tobacco, e-cigarettes are purported to be safer and less toxic than conventional cigarettes. Despite these claims, there’s still no real data on the effects of e-cigarettes (positive or negative), yet marketing materials still bill them as a healthy choice” (Worthington emphasis mine). Drug advertisements normally show the beneficial side of
The industry or the media have a major ethical responsibility in assuring the public’s health. If we are discussing the food industry they are a major source of where the public gets their food from; therefore, what they put in our food we consume and it affects our health. Ethically speaking, they should feel responsible for letting the public know what they are consuming, if there are outbreaks of disease or contamination in their products. As far as the media, they are the source where the public gets their information. The public depends on the media to uncover and report findings on public health. The media would not be as ethically responsible, seeing that some information might not get reported or might be missed; however, if it were not for the media the public would be in the dark on many situations regarding health. Thus, the media has an ethical obligation to investigate and report health findings.
The gases contain many harmful chemicals and they smell terrible. Also, the animal waste can contaminate the drinking water supplies. For example, the nitrates from the lagoons can seep into the groundwater, which can cause deaths in infants, spontaneous abortions, and can increase the risk of blue baby syndrome. Blue baby syndrome is an illness that begins with large amounts of nitrate ingested into the digestive system then the nitrate reacts with oxyhemoglobin to form metheglobin, which cannot carry oxygen. When talking about the actual food that comes out of industrial farms there can be many health concerns. Poor sanitation and waste management of the animals can lead to contamination of the food supply with bacteria like e.coli and salmonella. Animal products are the primary source of saturated fat in the American diet. Saturated fat has been directly linked to heart disease and obesity. Also, antibiotic resistance stems from the use of antibiotics to promote growth and decrease disease within the farm. The Center for Disease Control estimates that each year two million people in the United Stats contract antibiotic-resistant infections. CDC also confirmed a link between the use of antibiotic in farm animals and the growing problem of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which is responsible for the deaths of Americans each
In Lee Ann Fisher Baron’s “Junk Science,” she claims that the “food industry with the help of federal regulators” sometimes use “[a science that] bypasses [the] system of peer review. Presented directly to the public by…‘experts’ or ‘activists,’ often with little or no supporting evidence, this ‘junk science’ undermines the ability…[for] everyday consumers to make rational decisions” (921). Yet Americans still have a lot of faith in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to a 2013 Pew Research study, 65% of Americans are “very favorable” or “mostly favorable” of the FDA. When it comes to what people put in their bodies, the FDA has a moral obligation to be truthful and transparent. The bottom line of the FDA’s myriad of responsibilities is to help protect the health of Americans. Deciding what to eat is a critical part of living healthily, and consumers must be able to trust that this massive government agency is informing them properly of the contents of food. While the FDA does an excellent job in many areas, it has flaws in other areas. One of its flaws is allowing the food industry to print food labels that are deceptive, unclear, or simply not true (known as misbranding). This is quite the hot topic because a Google search for “Should I trust food labels” returns well over 20 million results, many of which are blog posts from online writers begging their readers not to trust food labels. HowStuffWorks, a division of Discovery Communications, published an online article whose author claims that “[the food industry] will put what they want on labels. They know the game….” While the food industry is partially at blame for misbranding, the FDA is allowing it to happen. If a mother tells her children that it is oka...
...niable, controllable connection between diet and cancer. To avoid increasing the odds of promoting all kinds of cancer, people should avoid animal products altogether and focus mainly on consuming vegetarian products in order to fully satisfy the requirements of the human body.
Although most of these chemicals pass Federal Food Safety laws, the people who consume processed or packaged foods are more vulnerable to fatal diseases. Scientist have not gathered enough information about the long term impact. This includes the impact on early stages of human development, especially in the womb.
How funny that we should mention the consumer’s safety. How safe are the consumers when they go to the super market? Carson says in chapter 11 that people who lived before 1942 had no traces of DDT in their body. Yet now, people are eating food infused with DDT which has been found to cause negative effects on the body. Carson says that we have eras referred to as “the age of reason” and “the age of innocence”, but she fears that our age will be known as “the age of poisons” (p.157)
Food has been a common source of necessity in our everyday lives as humans. It helps gives us nutrition and energy to live throughout our life. Over several decades, the development of making foods has evolved. They have changed from natural to processed foods in recent years. Nowadays natural ingredients are barely used in the making of foods like bread, cheese, or yogurt. The food industry today has replaced natural food making with inorganic ingredients. The cause of this switch is due to processed foods being easier, cheaper and faster to make. Artificial nutrition and processed foods have been proven to last longer in market shelves then natural foods. Also, due to artificial additives in processed foods they help satisfy consumers taste more than natural ingredients. The method of producing processed foods is common in today's food industry and helps make money faster and efficiently for companies. Examples of this can be found in all markets that distribute food. Even though processed foods may be easier and faster to make, they are nowhere near as healthy for consumers compared to natural foods. Natural foods are healthier, wholesome, and beneficial to the human body and planet then processed foods.
Fritz Haber was a Jewish German chemist who won a Nobel Prize for chemistry in 1918 after he found a way to pull nitrogen from the atmosphere and created synthetic fertilizer. “Using high pressure and a catalyst, he directly reacted nitrogen gas and hydrogen gas to create ammonia.” (Chemical Heritage Foundation). This is known as nitrogen fixation. He discovered this in a period of time when there was a shortage of food in the world. Half of our food comes from synthetic fertilizer. Even now with chemical fertilizer, millions of people don’t have enough food to feed themselves or their families. He may have contributed to chemistry with his findings, but he severely damaged agriculture. Chemical fertilizer does more harm than good because it damages the environment. More farmers should use organic fertilizers to grow crops.
Whenever we buy a product, we’re relying on both the company being honest with us about its contents as well as government regulations that do not always have the best interest of the consumer in mind. The first element to be included in my Food Bill of Rights is honesty. There are too many cases where American food has caused people to become sick and even caused fatalities because consumers do not know what they are eating. If you really look into the standards of what can be labeled as particular foods, the knowledge is really shocking. Consider the current policy of the United States Department of Agriculture; only 40% of beef is required for a company to label their products as such (Taco Bell’s Beef Problem). Further research shows the standards for meat in schools is lower than the standards for meat in fast food. Even with these outrageously low standards, there are still places to eat that don’t meet the requirements to label their products. Only a few years ago, Taco Bell was sued because they claimed their beef was 88% beef. However, when their meat was inspected it didn’t even make the required 40% minimum standard set by th...