NASCAR Censorship Summary

1836 Words4 Pages

Summary The purpose of this paper was to look at the brand loyalty that NASCAR fans show towards sponsors of the circuit. The researchers laid out a claim that there is currently little empirical research on the effect that sponsorship has on sports fans’ loyalty towards sponsoring brands. “A key premise of sponsorship is the belief that positive attitudes towards a sporting event or team will transfer to the sponsoring brands, which will result in positive outcomes for the sponsors such as enhanced brand image and brand loyalty” (Levin, et. Al, 2004, pg. 11). The researcher notes that companies are spending more than ever on advertising and as a result it is important to study its effect on brand loyalty, so entities know how valuable their …show more content…

The questionnaire contained four items, taken from Chaudhuri & Holbrook (2001), that are used to measure brand loyalty, utilizing the five-point Likert scale. Individuals who reported that they did not drink beer were dropped from further analysis which resulting in a reduction of sample sizes from 330 for the race spectators and 99 for the quote sample. The survey instrument also contained six items, on a seven-point scale, that are used to measure the degree of identification of NASCAR. The sum of these six items for each respondent created the NASCAR Fan Identification Index for that respondent. Two of the items were in relation to how big of a NASCAR fan they were, and how big of a fan their family and friends perceived them to be. The other four asked the respondent how often they follow NASCAR on television and radio, how often they follow NASCAR in print media, how often they follow NASCAR on the internet, and how often they wear or display NASCAR related …show more content…

The researchers had undergraduate students conduct a questionnaire before entering the raceway at the 2003 Busch Series event. The purpose of the study was to investigate brand loyalty that NASCAR fans showed towards its respective sponsors, in this case beer companies. As a result, I find it to be a weakness that the researchers chose to conduct the survey before the race as opposed to after. The title sponsor of the racing series was Busch, a beer brand, and you can assume that they would have signage and their product throughout the stadium. You could also assume that drivers would also be driving cars sponsored by other beer brands. To improve this, I would have conducted the data collection after the race, after the fans have been into the track, absorbed the sponsors intended message, and have a more holistic opinion on the race day

Open Document