Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyze the benefits of branding and brand loyalty
soft drink beverages case study
soft drink beverages case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analyze the benefits of branding and brand loyalty
Soft Drink Industry Five Forces Analysis:
Soft drink industry is very profitable, more so for the concentrate producers than the bottler’s. This is surprising considering the fact that product sold is a commodity which can even be produced easily. There are several reasons for this, using the five forces analysis we can clearly demonstrate how each force contributes the profitability of the industry.
Barriers to Entry:
The several factors that make it very difficult for the competition to enter the soft drink market include:
Bottling Network: Both Coke and PepsiCo have franchisee agreements with their existing bottler’s who have rights in a certain geographic area in perpetuity. These agreements prohibit bottler’s from taking on new competing brands for similar products. Also with the recent consolidation among the bottler’s and the backward integration with both Coke and Pepsi buying significant percent of bottling companies, it is very difficult for a firm entering to find bottler’s willing to distribute their product.
The other approach to try and build their bottling plants would be very capital-intensive effort with new efficient plant capital requirements in 1998 being $75 million.
Advertising Spend: The advertising and marketing spend (Case Exhibit 5 & 6) in the industry is in 2000 was around $ 2.6 billion (0.40 per case * 6.6 billion cases) mainly by Coke, Pepsi and their bottler’s. The average advertisement spending per point of market share in 2000 was 8.3 million (Exhibit 2). This makes it extremely difficult for an entrant to compete with the incumbents and gain any visibility.
Brand Image / Loyalty: Coke and Pepsi have a long history of heavy advertising and this has earned them huge amount of...
... middle of paper ...
... already setup. The will lack the clout that have with the bottler’s in the US.
Suppliers: Since the raw material’s are commodities there should be no problems on this front this is not any different
Customers: Internationally retailers and fountain sales are going to be weaker as they are not consolidated, like in the US Market. This will provide Coke and Pepsi more clout and pricing power with the buyers
Substitutes: Since many of the markets are culturally very different and vast numbers of substitutes are available, added to the fact that carbonated products are not the first choices to quench thirst in these cultures present additional significant challenges.
The consumption is very low in the emerging markets is miniscule compared to the US market. A lot more money would have to be spent on advertising to get people used the carbonated drinks.
First of all, if we think about ‘conventional’ soft drinks we immediately get the impression of drinks such as Coca-Cola, Pepsi and Red Bull.
To begin with the carbonated soft drink Industry is a profitable industry as its products such as Pepsi or Cola sell extensively across the globe. The industry relies heavily on its concentrate producers and bottlers to reach out to its market. This is further analyzed through Porter’s five competitive forces;
While contenders, for example, PepsiCo offer a scope of items that incorporates refreshments and snacks, Coca-Cola has stayed immovable as a pioneer in drink brands. Coca-Cola's rivals, then again, need to isolate their consideration between an extensive variety of item sorts.0020
The soft drink industry in the United States is a highly profitably, but competitive market. In 2000 alone, consumers on average drank 53 gallons of soft drinks per person a year. There are three major companies that hold the majority of sales in the carbonated soft drink industry in the United States. They are the Coca Cola Company with 44.1% market share, followed by The Pepsi-Cola Company with 31.4% market share, and Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. with 14.7% market share. Each company respectively has numerous brands that it sales. These top brands account for almost 73% of soft drink sales in the United States. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. owns two of the top ten brands sold. Colas are the dominant flavor in the U.S carbonated soft drink industry; however, popularity for flavored soft drinks has grown in recent years. The changing demographics of the U.S population have been an important factor in the growing popularity of these flavored soft drinks. The possible impact of this factor will be addressed later in the case.
Soft drinks are popular worldwide taking up 25% of the beverage market. Nearly two hundred countries enjoy these drinks. These drinks consist of carbonated water, flavoring, and lots of sugar.
Since the products in this industry are simple carbonated beverages, there is no need for significant customer-producer interaction because customers purchase the products mainly based on taste.
The Beverage Industry is a highly competitive one and tends to be dominated by a few major actors. The two biggest worldwide known and most influential companies are Coca-Cola and Pepsi. The limited growth opportunities make this competition very intense, requiring companies to follow the trends and be always aware of the competitors' progress. However, the demand for the products depends a lot on the economic conditions within the society. Those few big players enjoy the benefits of the strong loyal customer base during the growth and stability stage in the economy, whereas in times of economic difficulties customers turn to cheaper substitutes. Thus, although the key feature of the industry is that it is very difficult for a new unknown company to enter the market and compete with well-known long-established businesses, the companies should pay significant attention to the new entrants, especially in times of economic instability. Consumer tastes are also seasonal, meaning that the demand for the carbonated beverages is higher during the hot months of the year. Shifting consumer preferences bring the concern of operating uncertainty, which greatly affects pricing strategies. The large companies pay reliable dividends...
The social issues in this contemporary world tend to cause adults to begin worrying about their health at around age 37. This shift in the views of the adult population has forced Coca-Cola to expand into the sport drink market by producing Powerade. Along the same line of thought there are many people that are diagnosed with diabetes. This causes them to need to stay away from sugary drinks such as Coca-Cola. They have faced this challenge by creating of Diet Version of their ever so popular soda. These reactions to the social needs of its customers has aided Coca-Cola in maintaining its business and offsetting decreases in revenue from these two large groups of consumers.
The fear or threat of new entrants in the soft drink industry is low, compare to any other industry like restaurant chain or fast food and retail chain. Carbonated Soft drink industry has high barriers for new entrants. Brand loyalty is one the extremely high barrier for new entrants. The threat of competition has medium pressure on the market strategy for the carbonated soft drink industry because switching cost is low for any consumer. I.e. if you don’t like or want to taste of soda from Coca-Cola you can easily switch to Pepsi. Health awareness is major impact on beverage industry because today’s consumer have become more aware and health conscious. Other factor is advertising, coca cola spending $230 million in advertising for its flagship Coca-Cola drink. This will put more pressure on new competitors or new entrants. For any new entrants or corporation needs to spend more money which is not possible in early years of product launch. People who consume sugary drinks regularly: 1 to 2 can a day or more have more 26% chance of type 2 diabetes than people who rarely have such drinks. Risks are even greater in young children, adults. Due to awareness demand of healthy beverages and health awareness the competition from the health drinks provider has increased day by
The new entrants are unable to gain considerable visibility (Enrico & Kornbluth, 1986; Kourdi, 2015; Louis & Yazijian, 1980). The long-running and heavy advertising expenditure defining Pepsi, Coca Cola and own bottlers have helped them cultivate marked brand equity and large bases of loyal customers that new entrants cannot match. The Pepsi and Coca Cola retailers enjoy marked
Coke continuously out-stands Pepsi, even though they share a very similar taste and colour, however Coke should not be the drink that receives all the love and attention for what it offers. Despite their similar soda colour, the drinks actually contain some different ingredients, which produce a different taste, and affect the body differently. Furthermore, the way the companies markets their drinks makes a huge contribution to how successful their products will become. The major element for success however stems from their impact on society and how the companies utilize their social power to evolve. The two major soda companies are constantly head to head with one another, yet it is what they do that sets them apart.
The beverage industry is highly competitive and presents many alternative products to satisfy a need from within. The principal areas of competition are in pricing, packaging, product innovation, the development of new products and flavours as well as promotional and marketing strategies. Companies can be grouped into two categories: global operations such as PepsiCo, Coca-Cola Company, Monster Beverage Corp. and Red Bull and regional operations such as Ro...
As the world 's largest manufacturer and distributor of non-alcoholic beverages, Coca-Cola is certainly no stranger to global marketing. Established in the US, Coca-Cola initiated its global expansion in 1919 and now markets to more than 200 countries worldwide. It is one of the most recognizable brands on the planet and also owns a large portfolio of other soft drink brands including Schweppes, Oasis, 5 alive, Kea Oar, Fanta, Lilt, Dr Pepper, Sprite and PowerAde. Despite this, Coca-Cola often struggles to maintain its market share over its main rival PepsiCo in some overseas markets, particularly Asian countries.
Control of market share is the key issue in this case study. The situation is both Coke and Pepsi are trying to gain market share in this beverage market, which is valued at over $30 billion a year. Just how is this done in such a competitive market is the underlying issue. The facts are that each company is coming up with new products and ideas in order to increase their market share.
Experimentation with the new market for carbonated beverages on the decline coke has done experiments in new flavors and healthier alternatives to try to stay competitive. As well as investing in “Keurig Green Mountain is a K-Cup maker but has a new Keurig Cold that can deliver Coca-Cola through the new system.” (Cooper, 2014)