Musical Canon

1372 Words3 Pages

How the Musical Canon Came to Being?
The musical canon is controversial in its defining of the line that separates the composers making it into the canon and being excluded from it. The Germanic symphonic music and its most famous composer Beethoven are synonymous with the concept of musical canon that emerged in the 1800s. In fact, many authors consider that the musical canon was one with the dominant classes of Germany and other dominant countries in the world. Whether the composers placed in the canon deserved their place or not was always a matter of controversy. However, the underlying concept for the development of musical canon was closely tied with the German concept of the 1800s, freedom to play music that sounded beautiful. This growing …show more content…

The rising popularity of music in Europe, especially Germany was the result of the concept brought about to counteract the effects of the starkly opposite courtly life they were used to. This decision had an unprecedented effect of the entire musical history of Europe that included the greatest western musicians like Beethoven. Additionally, the musical canon played an immense role in the spread of popularity of music and gave employment to many people in the form of performers and composers. However, the method of inclusion into the canon was unknown and caused controversy among scholars to debate about the advantages and disadvantages of the canon. The increasing notion of the long-lasting impact of classical music and the rise in ideas about the autonomy of work and its concept played an important role for the musical cannon. This idea can be summed up as, “Without the notion of aesthetic autonomy the modern concept of fine art is unthinkable; and for music to qualify as a fine art, it had to be reconceived not as an activity but as a body of works” (Goehr 207). Although the pure, non-political and aesthetic nature of the canons were highly popular among the public then and fueled by the news houses in the nineteenth century, the canon is generally criticized in modern …show more content…

This mystery has been generally addressed by the modern scholars who claim that the large number of composers generally involved in the genre hampered the work concept of opera. People believed that opera played a relatively minor part or no part at all in the progress of the music in the nineteenth century. It was considered a major part of music in the seventeenth and eighteenth century when music was not quite widespread as after the introduction of the musical canon. However, the important part played by opera in progressive music then is recognized by modern scholars in the major musical countries like Germany. Beethoven played the major part in including this genre in the musical canon, although through his own contribution and works. Hence opera has been included in the studies of musical canon and highlights its importance. In fact, it has played a major role in establishing the aesthetic ideals of canon that was idealized by the involvement of Beethoven. The inclusion of instrumental music into the musical canon however raises the issue of the association of aesthetic music to its embodiment in the form of actual music. The rise of musical canon can be attributed to the rising materialization of music and scholars often refer to this phenomenon as derogatory to the standards of music in the long term although

Open Document