Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Elements of a crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Elements of a crime
Imagine an elderly man inviting someone into his home to take care of him, but then his caretaker surprisingly creates a scheme that will get rid of him because of his eye. The old man trusted him with his life, and suddenly he takes it from him. The man I am describing is Mr. Heart, who is guilty of committing first degree murder. He was the victim’s caretaker for a long enough duration of time for them to develop a father-son relationship with one another, yet he killed him in the end. Members of the jury, after going over the evidence against Mr. Heart in the State of New Jersey vs. Mr. Heart case, it is as clear as day that he should be convicted of first degree murder, because the facts show proof of premeditation, deliberation, and malice. …show more content…
Heart premeditating the murder, he also deliberately committed the crime. Everything he did was for a purpose, and he did everything he could to get him to his goal. His testimony states, “Upon the eighth night I was more cautious in opening the door” (Poe 2). Mr. Heart stalked the victim for eight days straight until he murdered him on the eighth night. He tells us specifically in his testimony that he watched the old man as he slept so that he would know the right time to take action. He did all of this purposely so that his plan would work without any flaws. This also shows us that he has plenty of time to consider his actions after deciding to kill the man (“First Degree Murder Law and Legal Definition”). Furthermore, “A defendant deliberates by considering the act and its consequences (but not necessarily the punishment), and deciding to follow through with it” (Segars). Mr. Heart made sure he was extra nice to the old man a week before the act, so that he would not suspect that anything wrong was going to happen. He knew that tricking the victim was wrong, but he did it anyway because it benefitted him and got him one step closer to fully carrying out his nefarious plan. Equally important, he took an excessive amount of time to fit his head into the door when he was stalking the victim during the night. “And every night, about midnight, I turned the latch of his door and opened it- oh so gently” (Poe 1). Mr. Heart not only stalked the old man every night for eight days, but he took an hour just to open the door. He did this solely because he did not want to startle the old man and ruin his plan that he’s worked so hard to carry out. Mr. Heart has done so much so that he could get away with murdering the victim. He cannot get away with all of the damage he has done by stalking the elderly man, being extra kind to him just so that he could take his life later, and taking his time to put his head in the doorway of the victim’s chamber as if it
Your honor, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, thank you for your attention today. [Slide #2] I would like to assert that separation is not the end of a relationship. Divorce is not the end of a relationship. Even an arrest is not the end of a relationship. Only death is the end of a relationship. In the case of defendant Donna Osborn, her insistence that ‘“one way or another I’ll be free,”’ as told in the testimony of her friend Jack Mathews and repeated in many others’, indicates that despite the lack of planning, the defendant had the full intent to kill her husband, Clinton Osborn.
Billy Joel once sang, “Only the good die young”. In life, it is true, the young and innocent seem to touch more lives around us than anyone else. In the Casey Anthony trial, Anthony was a suspect in the murder of her daughter Caylee. Caylee’s life shouldn’t be counted in years, it should be counted by how many lives she affected, the love she has gained, and the support the country has given her to find out what really happened. In the play, Twelve Angry Men, a boy killed his father; however, both cases were challenged by the obvious and the abstruse evidence. Large cities towards the east coast, in 1982, Twelve Angry Men, and 2008, Casey Anthony Trial, affiliated with two major trials able to modify the lives of the living and the dead. For that reason, during the Casey Anthony case, jurors were conflicted throughout the trial.
The actions that a parent takes in order to protect or support their child cannot be judged in a courtroom, because parents cannot describe the way that they feel knowing that their offspring is gone forever. In a court of law, Matthew Fowler should be tried for justifiable homicide, and he should possibly plead temporary insanity. A parent cannot control their violent actions, because the feelings that one feels towards a child is much stronger than any other emotion could ever be. Frank Fowler's life was taken in a horrific and traumatic matter, and for this, a parent cannot undergo the normal mourning process. A parent like Matthew Fowler could not go through each day knowing that their child's murderer is walking the streets freely. A mother, like Ruth Strout, would go crazy seeing that heartless person do everyday things that her son/daughter can no longer do. This would drive a person to temporary insanity, causing them to lash out and kill the murderer. Matthew Fowler had reason to kill Richard Strout, even if it would result in hurting Matthew in the end.
After the old man is dead and under the floorboards the police arrive, and the narrator remains calm and his "manor had convinced them.?Villains!" "Dissemble no more! I admit the deed! -- tear up the planks! -- Here, here! -- it is the beating of his hideous heart!" The narrator of "The Tell Tale Heart" shows that he is unreliable. Concluding the questioning by the police, the narrator had a sudden fear and assumed that the policemen have heard the old man?s heart beat. Not only the narrator could hear the old man?s heart beating, but it is assumed (from the audience perspective) that the police could hear the narrator?s heart beating. The narrator listening to the old man?s heart beat is a replacement of his own consciousness that brought out the guiltiness for murdering the old man.
Every once in awhile, a case comes about in which the defendant confesses to a crime, but the defense tries to argue that at the time the defendant was not sane. This case is no different; the court knows the defendant is guilty the only aspect they are unsure about is the punishment this murderer should receive. The State is pushing for a jail sentence and strongly believes that the defendant was sane at the time of the murder. It is nearly impossible for the defense to prove their evidence burden of 51%. The State claims that the defendant was criminally responsible at the time of the murder. By using excessive exaggeration, premeditation and motive, the Prosecution will prove that the defendant knew exactly what he was doing and how wrong it was.
In both stories, the chief characters plan in great detail the actions they will take to rid themselves of that which haunts them. The narrator of "The Telltale Heart" is the killer, and he explains in the telling of his story how he felt no ill will toward the old man, but how it was the old man's pale eye that caused his "blood (to) run cold; and so by degrees - very gradually - (he) made up (his) mind to take the life of the old man, and thus rid (himself) of the eye forever."[382] Later, he reflects on how meticulously he goes about entering the old man's room, planning the murder. "For seven nights - every night at midnight" he enters the sleeping chamber.[383] Prince Prospero, in Poe's "The Masque of the Red Death," decides to take with him many friendly "knights and dames"[386] from his court and hide away in secl...
First of all, I’d like to greatly thank the jury for coming and serving on this trial. Today, Mr. James King is being tried of the felony murder of Mr. Nesbitt. Mr. Nesbitt’s death is a sad truth to his family and his community. However, to place Mr. King as the murderer without solid evidence is preposterous. Remember, I’d like to remind the jury that if there is any reasonable doubt in the claim of Mr. King, you must vote not-guilty. I urge you to realise that by placing Mr. King in jail for 25 years to life, you will be compromising this young man’s entire future. I hope you make an informed decision to keep Mr. King out of jail.
The first time he hears the heart pounding is when he is killing the old man and it continues to drive him to complete his murder. He then even puts his hand to his heart and explains that there is no pulse and in fact it is the man’s heart he is hearing (paragraph 10). Then he beginning to hear this same rapid pulsation towards the end of the story that finally ends the whole situation and brings him to admit what he had done (paragraph 17-18). He hearing this heart beat might not be wither heart, but something else. It could be his self-conscious speaking to him driving him crazier. So every time he was doing some3thing bad or thought he was going to get caught his conscious would begin to make him think it was in fact the old man’s heart beating so loud that anyone and everyone could hear it. Finally at the end his conscious gets the better of him and he finally admits to the murder (paragraph
On February 2nd, 2016, in trial of the Odysseus, the jury found the defendant guilty of both counts of unjustifiable first degree murder. While both sides of the trial had differing points, the defense had an overall weak and unconvincing case while the prosecution provided strong evidence of these unjustifiable murders using a variety of persuasive techniques.
The heart told the tale of the murder. He was positive that he successfully got away with murder. The narrator no longer had to endure the agony of the vulture eye, but there was a new problem. The mystery of the old man’s beating heart gave the narrator the ideal that the police officers, also, knew of the horrific slaying. As the heartbeats grew louder, the narrator could no longer bare the sound of the heat. Yet, the sound the narrator heard was not real. It was all in his head. The narrator’s judgments to demonstrate he was sane proved that his was mentally unstable.
One in twenty-five or 4.1% of people sentenced to death are innocent(One in 25). A man named Cameron Todd Willingham was wrongfully sentenced to death. In Texas, during the year 2004 Cameron was accused of killing his three daughters in a fire. Cameron claimed that he was innocent from the very beginning, yet no one believed him. He was found guilty for the act of killing his three daughters in the fire. Later on after his execution, they found more information that helped them come to the conclusion that Cameron was indeed not guilty. As he said from the very beginning(Cameron Todd). This case is particularly weird because the court does not usually look back into a case after one is executed. Cameron is not the only one who was ever wrongfully executed. Cameron is one of many. “I’m actually really opposed to the death penalty”(Bill Paxton). Bill Paxton is one of many who agree that the death penalty is wrong. There are many reasons why one can oppose the death penalty, but the major reason one opposes the death penalty is because it puts the lives of innocent people at risk.
The 12 men in the movie 12 Angry Men, a jury, are deciding upon a case of murder in the first degree. The suspect in custody is an 18-year-old accused of stabbing his father. In this court system, premeditated murder is the most serious crime charged. If the jurors decide that the 18-year-old is guilty of murder than he will be sent to the electric chair and there is no other form of punishment. The men are very reluctant to hear this case because they feel it is very dull and that they can predict the outcome of the case. Alongside that, this trial is on the hottest day of the year with no A/C and no fan, which can account for some of the men’s guilty vote for they want to get out of the room.
We are family members and loved ones of murder victims. We desperately miss the parents, children, siblings, and spouses we have lost. We live with the pain and heartbreak of their absence every day and would do anything to have them back. We have been touched by the criminal justice system in ways we never imagined and would never wish on anyone. Our experience compels us to speak out for the change. Though we share different perspectives on the death penalty, every one of us agrees that New Jersey’s capital punishment system does not work, and that our state is better off without it (Cromie and Zott
It was midnight when it all happened. Tom Peterson was sleeping in bed next to his wife after a tiring day at work, while his two little daughters slept in the next room. Suddenly he was violently awakened by the terrified screams of his wife only to get a glance of a huge man standing over him with a butcher's knife. Tom was stabbed thirteen times, one of his daughters was killed and his wife was severely injured. Now, the Peterson family has just exited the supreme court of justice in which the judge has condemned the murderer of their little girl to the death penalty, for as it turns out the Peterson family had not been the first victim of this murderer.
The death penalty is unjust and risks outweigh any of the benefits. Many people believe the death penalty is an effective system and the punishment fits the crime yet so many innocent people have been put to death for crimes they did not commit. Reports show Gary Graham was executed in 2000 solely off the testimony of a witness who claimed to get a quick view of the defendant from 40 feet away through a windshield. The evidence is circumstantial but was enough not only to get a conviction but capital punishment. Troy Davis was executed in 2011 even though witnesses recanted their testimonies. The witnesses that were used in his case to further prove his guilt recanted their testimonies, therefore doing the exact opposite, mores proving him not guilty, but a death penalty sentence was still imposed. Cameron Willington was executed in 2004 for killing his ch...