Movie Analysis: A Christmas Carol

678 Words2 Pages

A Christmas Carol is one of the few traditional Christmas stories I have never read. I already knew the basic story line, but I didn’t really know what was going to happen. I love reading and watching things for the first time. It was fun seeing the different versions and comparing them to the book. There were some differences, escpecially in the Muppets movie, but overall the lesson still shown through. I think it’s a great story that teaches us how to really be grateful and love the people around us. The first movie we watched was the 1984 version of George C. Scott. This was a very serious version that I feel was very similar to the book. It showed how grumpy and unhappy Scrooge was and how big of a trasformation he had by the end of the movie. Obviously they didn’t get every detail right, but the directors did the best they could. Even though it was pretty similar to the book there …show more content…

To start off with the obvious it has a mixture of the Muppets and humans, but that one is a given. One of the first differences I noticed while watching the movie is that Charles Dickens is narrating the whole story. In the form of a Muppet, Charles Dickens is actually telling the story, with the help of Rizzo the rat. Throughout the movie these two characters help add humor. I makes the movie less scary in parts that might otherwise scare children. Another big thing is the singing. There are many songs that were added through out the movie. One of the first songs is where I spotted another big difference. When Bob Marley’s ghost comes to visit Scrooge you will notice that there is actually two of them. In the Muppets version they added in another character, Jacob Marley. When they come to warn Scrooge about the ghosts of Christmas past, present, and future they do it in the form of a song. This movie has many differences, but since it is made for children it is not excepted to follow the plot line

Open Document