Motor Functioning and Developmental Age of Children with Cerebral Palsy

1551 Words4 Pages

The first article that I reviewed is an empirical study about the motor functioning and developmental age of children with Cerebral Palsy. All together 107 children were studied, with a median age of 2 ½ years to 6 ½ years. The idea of this study was to see if there was a significant difference between the children’s calendar age and their developmental age, the children were tested using the Denver II test, which tests the language and motor skills of children. CP (cerebral palsy) is the most common disability affecting children nearly 2 out of every 1000 ( clinical ) births have been diagnosed with CP. It is a disorder that affects the motor function of children and sometimes the developmental or cognitive functioning of a child, meaning language or sensory functions due to some more extreme cases where children have lesions in some portions of their brain.
The Psychologists Reason for using the Denver II over any other developmental test was because the test also allows for personal, social and language development testing. They found that there was a significant difference between the children’s developmental age and their calendar age, and that of the cognitive and behavioral skills of children with CP (with hindered language development) were lower than children who had normal language development. Also the language development in children had no influence on motor skill in the children studied. So, basically the results showed that the CP was not the only thing effecting the child’s motor functions, some of the children being tested also had other disorders accompanying the CP that caused some of the motor and learning delay. The developmental age was much lower than the calendar age in the children, and the Denv...

... middle of paper ...

...lities are roughly the same. Children with CP have a harder time making and keeping friends is a problem, because they physically look different and children can be very superficial, which can lead to bullying. However in a newer study in a mainstream school where physical deformities didn’t matter, it was the disruptiveness, lower IQ, and hyperactivity that caused the bullying and lack of friendships. Friendship may have a correlation with not only peer-relations but it may benefit cognitive function as well, if children with CP have friends and participate in social learning in the classroom, the children learn from imitating their classmates. But if a child, at an early age, is rejected by his/her classmates it may cause cognitive development to slow down. With rejection, school seems less enjoyable resulting inn avoidance and lower grades overall.

Open Document