Many policies are adopted by nations when attempting to address critical concerns about society, but which policies were adopted by Mexico? We need to acknowledge that Mexico was in a position of addressing many development goals and thus implemented the holy trinity of neoliberalism. Let us first look at the holy trinity of neoliberalism: privatization – selling state-owned enterprises to private investors; deregulation – reducing government regulations of anything that could possibly diminish profits; liberalization – introducing free trade by removing trade barriers. From this we can understand that the main purpose of neoliberalism was to reduce government interference (economically) and allow the people to take matter into their own hands.
Globalization
Discuss 3 positive aspects of globalization on Mexico.
Nowadays, globalization is very important in the world. Globalization is the process that is the world becomes increasingly interconnected, such as business and communication (BBC News, 2015). The globalization is influencing the countries and it makes every country brings new challenges and opportunities. Therefore, this essay will discuss and analyze positive about Mexico economic globalization, political globalization and cultural globalization.
Mexico is growing a lot compared to other emerging countries. Mexico’s sells more exports to the U.S.A than China. Moreover, it is Latin America’s largest economy industrial base, exporting more cars than any country. Also, Mexican middle class grows alongside an industrial corridor running from Juarez to Mexico City and its political system is essentially stable. However, Mexico has failed to diminish the gap between poverty and wealth. The article states that since Mexico entered in NAFTA, income per head has grown by an annual average of barely 1%. Also, disorder, bribery and conflicts of interest prevail among the judicial systems who’s supposed to care for the poor people. The article mention three lessons that can be used to reduce inequality
De Cordoba, José & Lunhow, David. “The Perilous State of Mexico.” The Wall Street Journal. Dow
While Venezuela, Brazil and Mexico have each tackled the poverty issue by increasing social spending, the types of programs and use of resources has had and will continue to have different effects for the future. Venezuela, relying on the revenue of high oil prices, has vastly increased social spending on building homes and clinics. Brazil has tackled education and health to address the issue of poverty, while Mexico has concentrated on stipends to poor families that is slated to be the most successful at tackling the actual causes of poverty. While in the short run these programs grant benefits to the poor, in the long run the failure to significantly address the causes of poverty can contribute to continued dissatisfaction with the quality of democracy.
American financial institutions such as the government, banks and nonprofit organizations have had a long history of giving economic aid to developing nations to prevent large-scale economic collapse and for reconstruction after disasters. This is especially the case after World War II and the Bretton Woods Conference, which was the foreground for what today is the World Bank. The United States has failed to improve nations at times when providing aid to other countries and regions, especially in regions such as Latin America. A prime example of this type of failure was the development and implementation of an economic aid system, named the Washington Consensus. Countries such as Argentina, Brazil and Mexico suffered greatly for many years because, “what had been sold in the early 1980s as a foolproof ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution was shown to be very uneven”(Dunkerly 2008 310). Flawed developmental policy such as this, created a terrible economic collapse for nearly all of Latin America, which is still changing policy to recover from the 1980s crisis today. Similarly, when Central and South America’s economy declined, US foreign policy also began to change to reflect the problems being caused between the two regions. Overall, this paper will define what the Washington Consensus is and how it affected American foreign policy concerning Latin America in areas such as developmental aid models, immigration and illegal drugs. By looking back at such failures we are able to change the way aid is distributed in a more positive and effective way.
The debt crisis of 1982 was the most serious of Latin America's history. Incomes dropped; economic growth stagnated; because of the need to reduce importations, unemployment rose to high levels; and inflation reduced the buying power of the middle classes.[5] In fact, in the ten years after 1980, real wages in urban areas actually dropped between 20 and 40 percent.[7] Additionally, investment that might have been used to address social issues and poverty was instead being used to pay the debt.[1]
World Bank Latin American and Caribbean studies, Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean: Breaking with
Mexican Lives is a rare piece of literature that accounts for the human struggle of an underdeveloped nation, which is kept impoverished in order to create wealth for that of another nation, the United States. The reader is shown that the act of globalization and inclusion in the world’s economies, more directly the United States, is not always beneficial to all parties involved. The data and interviews, which Hellman has put forth for her readers, contain some aspect of negativity that has impacted their lives by their nation’s choice to intertwine their economy with that of the United States. Therefore it can only be concluded that the entering into world markets, that of Mexico into the United States, does not always bring on positive outcomes. Thus, one sees that Mexico has become this wasteland of economic excrement; as a result it has become inherently reliant on the United States.
The United States has no more important foreign relation ship than that of which it enjoys with Mexico, and vice versa. These two countries share interwoven societies and economies. Although there have been disagreements and turbulence between the two countries, which partnership is without these? The Strength of each country’s democracy is fundamental to the other’s. This relationship that the two countries share directly affects that lives of millions of Mexican and United States citizens everyday. Recently these two countries have become even more unified than ever before. Tackling issues such as Border Control, Countering Narcotics, Dealing with multiple Law enforcement agencies, Human Rights laws, trade and development, etc. There are many issues that they are mutually interested in and must deal with. Yet, there are some vast differences in which these two countries are run. There are also many similarities, which we must take into account. Both Democratic Governments have similar structures, containing a legislative, judicial, and executive branch. Yet, these structures are very different internally, containing specific duties that the other country’s branch may not have.