Mayflower And The Pilgrims Analysis

535 Words2 Pages

Settling into the “New World” was a burden on not only the Pilgrims, but on the adapting Natives as well. In “The Mayflower and the Pilgrims’ New World,” Nathaniel Philbrick writes about much of the Pilgrims history arguing that the basic story does not illustrate the complexity of the relationship between the Native Americans and the Pilgrims. Although, the Pilgrims struggled in the beginning, much of the burden was lifted by the help of the Natives. However, the breaking of the alliance, that aided the Pilgrims in their first years, causes me to point fingers towards the Pilgrims. The Pilgrims’ disrespectful, threatening, and harsh manner puts them to blame for the break down on the good relations between the Natives and the Pilgrims. The first generation settlers had a good relationship with the Native Americans. This was due to the respect between the leaders, Massasoit and Winslow. However, the later generations were not. They took advantage of their better living conditions and thus, “...were less willing to treat the Native Americans with the tolerance and respect their parents once offered,”(Philbrick 194). Without the Native Americans help, their parents wouldn't have survived their first years. The …show more content…

They took most of their land as a way for the Native Americans to pay for Winslow’s help. The Pilgrims forced Sachem Philip to sign a treaty, threatening the chance of war which Philip was in no position for. The treaty stated that the Sachem turn over all his weapons and pay a fine. Now the Sachem was even weaker than before. Draining almost everything from him, “Plymouth had given Philip no options: If he were to survive as the Sachem of the Pokanokets, he must now go to war,”(Philbrick 206). The Pilgrims must have known what was to come. After losing almost everything the Sachem had to regain them back, for his people and himself. This starts a long and brutal war with many lives lost on either

Open Document