Maus I And II Literary Analysis

1063 Words3 Pages

Maus I and II by Art Spiegelman follows primarily his father’s and mother’s experiences during the rise of the Nazi power. However, many instances in these novels could be categorized as European History as well. Spiegelman beautifully combines both family memories and history at certain moments in each novel. The reader can get a sense of sentimental memories during one frame, then switch to the broad history everyone knows from textbooks.

These books are both family history and Europe’s past. This is because Spiegelman’s father Vladek also told the history of many people in Europe who he met during his horrific journey. He actually named a lot of people who would have stayed nameless in a regular textbook or class session. In addition, …show more content…

This is because some scenes are just too personal to be included in the broader scope of Europe's past. Such subjects are only known when the older generation passes the memories down to the younger generation. Throughout both novels, Spiegelman’s father Vladek would just sit down with his son and recount the good and horrible memories he had to face personally during the Holocaust. Of course some information Vladek gives is broad European history, but whenever he mentioned his family or personal encounters he had with other people, those are personal memories only family could know. For instance, when he mentioned how he met Anja for the first time in Maus I. This is family history because for one it happened a significant amount of time before the Holocaust even happened, and second it told the origin of two major characters. Some may categorize that whenever Vladek or Art spoke about Anja as family history. She was brought up numerous times during the present era captured in these novels (when Art is an adult). Vladek would constantly call out her name or wish that she was still alive so he didn’t have to deal with Art’s step-mother Mala. Another example of the story diverging from European history is when Vladek listed all his different jobs at Auschwitz in Maus II. This was his personal memory that ended up helping him survive at different points while being a prisoner at …show more content…

This is because emotion might cloud the actual event from being expressed. In some cases, the person retelling history they experienced might have repressed certain events (for example, if someone experienced the gas chambers) that their brain couldn’t physically retain due to the graphic images. In addition, memories could involve emotion or doesn’t quite need one-hundred percent accuracy. It is mainly (but not exclusively) for the family members and younger generations to know what the older generations of their family went through. It is for their own personal reasons. This would not be the case for world history because this is mainly about the facts. Of course, emotion can be involved, but this history needs to be conveyed by viable sources. In this case of the Maus I and II, if Art was going for straight facts then he would have to go to several other survivors of the Holocaust. He knew that his father’s memory has been damaged due to the

Open Document