Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of genocide
Genocide against Tutsi in Rwanda
Genocide against Tutsi in Rwanda
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of genocide
In 1994, in Rwanda, about 800,000 people perished within 3 months. It was a genocide of the tutsi minority which was led by the Hutus. It is argued that people can result to committing violent acts when threatened, that it is an act of attaining safety, egotism, and people tend to ignore logic when threatened.
Ordinary people can be violent as an act of self defense. Take Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs in which safety comes in as the second fundamental need following the physiological needs.Safety is crucial to the lives of the people and therefore needs to be obtained all the time. If humans aren’t safe, they tend to forget everything that comes after that, such as love, esteem, etc. In the study of the Hierarchy of needs, Gwayne states that “people who are deprived of lower needs such as safety may defend themselves by violent means. (Gwayne, 1999) This explains that violence comes in necessary because it is the initial reaction on
…show more content…
They will more likely to do such violence under the pressure of a higher authority, for instance, the government. This can be seen in Rwandan genocide. The government and the officials pressured the hutus to kill their neighbors, and those who did not follow the orders were killed on the spot. The RTLM, a radio station which was sponsored by the government, also pressured the hutus to kill the tutsi minority. The tutsi minority were expressed as the enemies and “cockroaches” and therefore needed to be exterminated. Killing the Tutsis became a duty for the Hutus, as the RTLM have commanded, “Clean your neighborhood of brush. Cut the tall trees… Do your work.” (Rusesabagina, 82) Rusesabagina’s encounter with a potential killer conveyed the government’s power towards the hutus. In return, the killers were given properties and money; Paul explains: “The money was for a last bribe, something to pay the militia to let me and my family be shot rather than face a machete.” (Rusesabagina,
The subculture of violence theory revolves around individuals using violent acts in need of survival. In this theory, people kill because one was living their lifestyle through violent acts as normal behavior. According to Thio, Taylor, and Schwartz they mention, “violent behavior is more effective than nonpoor families’ (Thio et al, 2013, p. 79). Most poor neighborhoods have higher chances of committing crimes, especially, knowing that the behavior of the actions is reflected towards survival. These behaviors can be reflected on the family, peers, and community aspects. Living in poor neighborhoods, can be scary when not knowing what type of violent act or individuals that live around one. For example; some individuals might be influenced with gangs or fall into the wrong crowd. Individuals, who choose violence, are influenced by the experience from these gang groups, peers, parents, or normal neighborhood behaviors. These individuals live through the violence acts to kill because this is the type of lifestyle they are living in. I believe that people are violent because they believe killing is an escape to get away from issues and own problems. Also, people might turn to killing because it’s the main solution for survival. For example; if one is being harassed, one might feel that violence could to a key factor to protect themselves in this type of
In the article Human Behavior: Killer Instincts, Dan Jones argues that killing is not so much an instinct as it is a by-product of an event. Say someone has wronged another, by stealing or messing up a romantic relationship. Often the solution that makes the most sense is violence. Believing that they have been wronged, people often seek revenge as their solution. According to that scenario, one can believe that it is human nature to react violently.
Violence can be justified if the cause is to protect yourself or others; The Outsiders by: S.E. Hinton gives light to these crimes. Creating change helps the lives of people prosper and grow usually people create change with violence. Our planet changes everyday our thoughts, opinions, feelings and people come in and out of our lives and we cannot change that with anything we do. When reading The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton you get told a story about the hardships of teens living in “the hood”. It brings light to what they go through to protect themselves and their loved
Former UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali once said, "We were not realizing that with just a machete, you can do a genocide." To be candid, nobody anticipated the Rwandan Genocide that occurred in 1994. The genocide in Rwanda was an infamous blood-red blur in modern history where almost a million innocent people were murdered in cold blood. Members of the Tutsi tribe were systematically hacked or beaten to death by members of the Interahamwe, a militia made up of Hutu tribe members. In just 100 days, from April 6, 1994 to mid-July, 20% of Rwanda's population was killed; about 10,000 people a day. Bodies literally were strewn over city streets. Genocide obviously violates almost all articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; however, the article I find most important is Article 3 - the right to life, liberty, and personal security. In just 100 days, one million people were denied the most basic privilege granted to every human – the right to live, simply because they were born to the wrong tribe.
The genocides of the 20th century which occurred in Rwanda and Germany had striking similarities, something that should have alerted the world to stop them. At the core of these two massacres, patterns existed that outlined how similar thinking and reasoning could lead to something as horrible as these two events. One can see how both groups used their command of knowledge as a way to control the people, how the rest of the world refused to step up to stop the killings, and how the people were thought of as less than humans to provide a just cause for such terrible acts.
The Rwandan Genocide was a terrible event in history caused by a constantly weakening relationship between two groups of people. The country of Rwanda is located in Africa and consists of multiple groups of people. Majority of Rwanda is Hutu, while a smaller amount of people are Tutsis. The genocide started due to multiple events that really stretched the relationship between the two groups to its end. One of the starting factors was at the end of World War 1. Rwanda was a German colony but then was given to Belgium “who favored the minority Tutsis over the Hutus, exacerbated[exacerbating] the tendency of the few to oppress the many”(History.com). This created a feeling of anger towards the Tutsis, because they had much more power then Hutus.
Africa has been an interesting location of conflicts. From the conflict between Ethiopia and Eritrea to the revolutionary conflict in Libya and Egypt, one of the greatest conflicts is the Rwandan Genocide. The Rwandan Genocide included two tribes in Rwanda: Tutsis and Hutus. Upon revenge, the Hutus massacred many Tutsis and other Hutus that supported the Tutsis. This gruesome war lasted for a 100 days. Up to this date, there have been many devastating effects on Rwanda and the global community. In addition, many people have not had many acknowledgements for the genocide but from this genocide many lessons have been learned around the world.
When the Belgian colonizers entered Rwanda in 1924, they created an ethnic classification between the Hutu and the Tutsi, two tribes who used to live together as one. After independence in 1962, there was a constant power struggle between the two tribes. Former Canadian Prime Minister, Jean-Pierre Chrétien described the situation as “tribalism without tribes.” (Destexhe, 1995) There were many signs leading towards genocide, yet the nations in power chose to ignore them. From April 6, 1994 until mid-July, a time spanning approximately of 100 days, 800,000 people were murdered when the Hutu attacked the Tutsi. No foreign aid came to the rescue until it was too late. Ten years after the genocide the United Nations was still involved in Rwanda, cleaning up the mess that was left behind because of man’s sinful nature. Could the Rwandan Genocide have been prevented, or is it simply a fact of life? Even though the international community is monitoring every country and race, such an event as the Rwandan Genocide could occur again because the European colonizers introduced ethnic classification where it did not exist and the nations in power chose to ignore the blatant signs of genocide.
The Twentieth Century witnessed an unprecedented number of genocides. However, the most chilling of them all was the Rwandan genocide because it was the most rapidly executed state sponsored mass murder and it could have been prevented. Between April and July of 1994, an estimated eight hundred thousand people were murdered in Rwanda, in what was eventually called a
Violent crimes occur for many different reasons. Students who rampaged through the high schools throughout the United States have all said to have one thing in common; their peers did not respect the attackers. These students say they have felt bullied, or not belonging or not fitting in to what the “popular” standards are. So why resort to anger? Many said it feels it gives them the respect that they were deprived of and what they felt they deserved. These students make national and world news headlines, and they feel they have power and control when resorting to violence. Other reasons include drugs and gangs, which are at the top of the list followed by disagreements.
Some of the problems include how the Tutsi people were treated and also how the Hutu people. Genocide is a big problem in Rwanda. In 1994 many people were murdered. From April to July of 1994, members of the Hutu ethnic majority in the east central African nation of Rwanda murdered as many as 800,000 people, mostly of the Tutsi minority. About 85% of the population was Hutu, the rest were Tutsi along with a small number of Twa.
Many situations and acts that are unacceptable need a stressor. Stressors are situations and/or events that lead to a catastrophic outcome, such as the Rwanda genocide. The tension between both the Hutu and Tutsi already existed; it only needed something to reach its breaking point – a stressor. On April 6, 1994, the plane that occupied Juvenal Habyarimana, President of Rwanda, and Cyprien Ntaryamina, President of Burundi crashed due to unexplained circumstances. Over the next three months in Rwanda after the crash carrying both Presidents, mass killings began to occur. The kill count escaladed dramatically leaving one million Rwandans dead and two million seeking refugee status among its neighbors: Zaire, Tanzania, and Burundi (Kellow and Steeves 1998). This stressor is a key contribution to the events that followed; the Rwandan Genocide. “The rise in tension and violence, the wide distribution of arms to civilians and militia, and the increasingly vehement anit-Tutsi propaganda broadcast by Radio Libre de Mille Collines, all indicated the growing potency of ethnic hatred” (Uvin 1998, 83-84). Ethnic hatred centered on the hostility and segregation towards a particular group, in this case the Tutsi. The use of fear, rumor, and panic enabled the unsteady decline of trust between the Hutu and the Tutsi, which eventually escaladed to pure ethnic hatred (Kellow and Steeves, 1998; Straus, 2007; Uvin, 1998). The role of the media in the Rwandan genocide contributed to further violence and hatred among the Hutu and the Tutsi residents. One of the ways in which information could be obtained throughout Rwanda that was easily accessible was through public broadcasting particularly the radio. Through radio broadcasting it enables the public...
For nearly one hundred days in 1994, cruel murders took place in Rwanda by the unethical Hutu tribe. Over a million lives were lost, almost destroying the Tutsi race. Immaculée Ilibagiza, one of the survivors, openly shared her story with us. How? How were so many lives lost in such a short time? Is the main question asked when thinking of Rwanda. How on earth could more than one hundred thousand people do that, how could so many people think it’s logically okay to go through with something so evil. Seems like a horrible nightmare. If we were to look into what led them to do this, it becomes crystal clear that the initial factors was due to just the spread of falsity. Though it can’t be proven, it is often said that a small
On April 6, 1994, the deliberate and systematic extermination of millions of Tutsi ethnic people began to strangle the entire population of Rwanda. The genocide destroyed lives; those that survived were left without loved ones, and ordinary Hutus turned against their neighbors and slaughtered them. Those that led the sadistic massacres were Hutu extremists. They were able to eliminate from 800,000 to 1,000,000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu in Rwanda in less than 100 days, helped by almost 200,000 Hutu civilians. Killers used machetes, clubs, guns and other brutal weapons to dispose of their victims, often in places of congregation like schools and churches, as well as at road blocks set up by the government. The genocide had serious planning put into it, and the regime of the last president before the genocide helped do that. The Habyarimana regime was able to set the stage for the Rwandan Genocide through preexisting economic conditions, ethnically biased political promotions and ethnic killings, and international support.
When one thinks of what families do for each other, they will most likely think of care. More specifically they think of the care that a parent has for their child. Parents have to meet certain “needs” for the child in order for the its healthy survival. Children must be fed and clothed. Parents must also watch over the safety of and be the friends of the children. Cheering on in good times and making their child the best it can be are also responsibilities of parents. The family metaphor is used when describing the Human Relations method of management. In this the management of a company is seen as the parents and the employees are seen as the children. Employees, as seen as the children also have certain needs as well. These needs are very similar.