Human Behavior: Killer Instincts: Dan Jones's Analysis

506 Words2 Pages

Many people argue whether violence is a part of the human brain or just a result from our society. Violence could be wired into our system, evolving with us since our savage past, but one does not know for sure. In the article Human Behavior: Killer Instincts, Dan Jones argues that killing is not so much an instinct as it is a by-product of an event. Say someone has wronged another, by stealing or messing up a romantic relationship. Often the solution that makes the most sense is violence. Believing that they have been wronged, people often seek revenge as their solution. According to that scenario, one can believe that it is human nature to react violently. In Candide, Candide has accumulated a record of killing. He claims that he kills for love. Upon meeting …show more content…

He lets his passion for his beloved to blind his morals. Similarly, Dan Jones finds that, “murderous actions are usually the by-product of urges towards some other goal” (Human Behavior: Killer Instincts). In both cases, violent actions are not instinct, but rather just an unfortunate result of something else. For Candide, that something else is his undying love for Cunégonde. His devotion to her blinds his moral consciousness and leads his down a path of violence. Dan Jones also says that, “humans have repeatedly encountered a wide range of situations in which the benefits of killing another person outweighed the costs” (Human Behavior: Killer Instincts). Inline with that thought process of the “human adaption theory”, Candide found that killing the men that own Cunégonde leads to greater benefits than what he will have to endure due to his violent behavior. For example, he is willing to be constantly on the run and is willing to never step into certain countries all for his hope to someday marry Cunégonde. He was willing to kill Cunégonde’s brother, her last piece of family and his only hope for a blessing to their

Open Document