Leadership can be defined as “the action of leading a group of people or an organisation, or the ability to do this” (Oxford Dictionary, 2015). Although this is a simplified definition, it has been said that there is no one definition of leadership. During my time in class I studied a wide variety of substantial leadership essays, books and TED talks. Each academic piece, in their own way, highlighted a different aspect or attitude toward leadership in an organisation or environment. For the purpose of this essay I am going to review: Leadership VS Management, Transactional and Transformational leadership, Contingency Theory, Trait Theory and then I will be giving my personal experience and view of leadership in my workplace.
Management is the brains of a business. It is where someone has ultimately authority and responsibility for the task but is not necessarily the person executing the task. Management distributes the task to others in the team and act as advisor and facilitator. They establish systems, create rules and operating procedures, and put into place incentive programs. Management is about the business, not always the people. The people are important as a way of getting the job done. Leadership is the heart of a business. Leaders are active in most tasks. They are usually the first to take action. The leader has vision, drive and enthusiasm. The essence of leadership means inspiring a group to come together for a common goal. Leaders motivate, counsel and work with people to keep them bonded and eager to move forward. That...
As stated before management and leadership are two different concepts. Wikipedia defines management as "the process of leading and directing all or part of an organization, often a business, through the deployment and manipulation of resources". In the world of business, management can be stated as a pursuit towards an overall goal that is effective and efficient. Also management is the ability to integrate works from different workforces through planning, and organizing. Ultimately management is a theory that is put into practice by a team to create a successful organization. The individuals in these teams are known as managers. It is the job of these individuals to guide a company towards the goal. To properly manage it takes a set of functions to make the organization su...
What is leadership? Leadership is having the ability to give guidance to those that will follow. Those that follow will help to complete the mission. Leadership is a soft science, just as anthropology, sociology and psychology. It cannot be proven exactly what it is. Leadership is an art, the skillful application of leadership behaviors beyond techniques is much the same as the skillful application of brushstrokes by a master painter. Leadership is both rational and emotional. It involves both sides of human experience. It includes actions and influences based on reason and logic as well those based on inspiration and passion. Leadership is a social process shared among all members of a group. Leadership development comes through experience. We all learn from our different experiences. Whether positive or negative, they are our tools for growth and development.
Leadership and management are two words that are commonly mistaken; the relation and the differences between them are often unclear. Leadership can be defined as the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or a set of goals." Managers are there to plan, organize, lead and monitor employees' activities. Leaders also have to be able to guide an organization through change. As we will see later, vision is a crucial component in the success of this task.
What is the difference between management and leadership? It is a compelling question that is often asked and also answered in many different ways. Management and leadership are very different skills. The key difference between managers and leaders can be identified in the way they motivate the people who work or follow them. Managers have subordinates, utilize an authoritarian / transactional style, are work focused, and seek comfort. Leaders have followers, utilize a charismatic / transformational style, are people focused, and seek risk.
Leadership is the ability to influence employees to voluntarily pursue organizational goals. Leadership is vision, enthusiasm, love, trust, passion and consistency. Management is to pursue organizational goals efficiently and effectively by integrating the work of people through planning, organizing, leading, and controlling organizations resources. Leadership and management are not the same. They are not interchangeable. Leadership is coping with change and management is coping with complexity (Williams 444).
Management and leadership are viewed as two different perspectives in the business environment. As described by Dr. Warren Bennis ‘Managers are people who do things right, while leaders are people who do the right thing’, this means that managers do things by the set rules and follow company policy, while leaders follow their own intuition, which may in turn be of more benefit to the company.
Management and leadership skills in nursing and other healthcare professions are becoming a more and more widely spoken of subject, as they are essential skills for everyday practice in delivering care (Gopee and Galloway, 2009). Effective management requires the nurse to be able to draw on evidence based knowledge and experience to develop the ability to manage competently during practice. Skills without knowledge, appropriate attitude and understanding will not equate to competency (Watson, 2002).
plant manager’s vision is for his postal facility to achieve their expectations in the overall
Management and leadership are two words that are considered synonymous but describe two different concepts. According to the dictionary, management is the act, manner, or practice of managing; handling, supervision, or control; leadership is the capacity or ability to lead. In many organizations, management is a job description; leadership is a positive trait. The purpose of this paper is to distinguish between the two, to look at the responsibilities that come with leadership, and make suggestions about creating and maintaining a healthy organizational culture.
There is a thin line between leadership and management although, they complement each other. Management involves planning and budgeting, organizing and staffing while leadership involves setting direction and aligning people. Although there is a slight difference, these two complement each other. Management concerns itself more with working to bring an already existing plan of action but leadership is the office that creates the plan. The manager ensures that everyone acts in accordance to a plan that exists already. Akin to the leader the manager organizes and controls but his office ends here. The leader is the one that creates the plan and the manager maps out the course of action. The leader directs and the manager co-ordinates thus leadership can’t exist without management yet they are two separate offices with leadership at the helm.
An organization is often viewed as systems and management is often defined as human action that facilitate any organization , in other words management is said to be a distinct process that comprises of planning , organizing , actuating and controlling. It is practiced in order to accomplish pre determined objectives. (George R. Terry) Leadership is another facet that accelerates the further process of management , it is one of the key components of direction which is further termed as an asset required for successful management of an organization. Management and leadership are two different notions that are interchangeable but having different approaches with a similar outlooks. Management as a whole is a process that is having main focus on completion of task efficiently at minimal cost. The main aim of a management is to direct all the activities related to an organization towards accomplishment of targeted goals. On the flip side leadership is said to be more directed towards vision and inspiration, it is often regarded as an influential process in an organization that is carried on by an individual which has a focus on achieving the targeted goal that is recognized and benchmarked by the management. In today’s 21st century both effective mangers as well as efficient leader play a vital role.
Leadership is a bit like the adage, “if a tree falls in the woods and no one can hear it, does it make a sound?” My question is, “without followers, does a leader lead?” My first artifact, LEAD 510 Leadership and Managers Essay, illustrates my knowledge in understanding there are distinct characteristics of an effective leader. The source of power for a leader lies in the relationships that a leader has with their followers and the ability to get them to do something. Sometimes these things can be negative or positive, towards a company goal, or self-promotional that the leader is encouraging followers towards in their behavior. Leaders influence others differently based on the type of leadership theory that is being studied. Nielsen & Munir (2009) focus on transformational leaders and that they influence followers through creating buy-in into a visionary system. This particular system creates influence by encouraging employees to make independent decisions (Nielsen & Munir, 2009). Leaders may also influence based off of different types of power that maybe legitimate, coercive, rewarding, and expert (Raven, 2008).
The term rationality could be portrayed as an assemblage of joined learning, which shows the stage for compelling thinking in uncovering the explanations for specific sorts of issues. Both administration and authority rationalities give the stage that aides in tending to the tests confronted by the association. An official who needs methods of insight can have constrained potential for inventive thinking independent of his essential discernment. The creation of a viable logic of initiative and administration maybe serves as the most realistic self-developmental activity that might be done by an official. Sound administration and initiative methods of insight help associations achieve the most elevated statures of accomplishment by gathering the set objectives and destinations. The current conceptualization of these methods of insight follow its beginning to the Biblical understanding of administration and authority. This implies that there is a relationship between the Christian methodology to authority and administration and the common viewpoint on the same.