The Manitoba Métis Federation (MMF) represents the Métis community in Manitoba in political, cultural, social and economic matters (Manitoba Métis Federation (MMF), 2013). Manitoba Métis Federation, representing Métis in Manitoba, filed a claim asking for a declaration that the federal and provincial statutes, which affected the implementation of Manitoba Act provisions, were "constitutionally invalid” (Chartrand, p. 477, 1991). In Section 31 of Manitoba Act, 1870, it provided lands to the Métis people. Section 32 assured the settlers, Aboriginal or not, that their occupied lands in 1869 would not be “jeopardized” by the wave of newcomers (Sprague...
During the late 19th century, Canada’s relationship with its Metis population was strained and full of hardships. The conflict began with the transfer of Rupert’s Land from the Hudson’s Bay Company to the Government of Canada, without the consultation or consent of the Metis who resided therein. The Canadian Government sent surveyors out to plot land occupied by Metis people before the transfer was completed, and the survey team was met with opposition by a Metis party led by Louis Riel. The Metis formed a provisional government, and a pro-Canadian party formed to resist the Metis, but resulted in the execution of Thomas Scott, a Protestant whose death caused turmoil among English speaking communities. Another major reason for conflict occurred years later, after the Canadian Government and the Metis revealed conflicting views over the process of dividing land that was entitled to the Metis in the Manitoba Act of 1870. Dissatisfaction over this and other land issues led the Metis to reform their provisional government, take up arms, and engage in a string of battles against the Canadian Government. It is safe to say that the conflict between the Metis and the Canadian Government in the years 1869 to 1885 began and escalated largely because the Metis people were denied rights to the land they occupied and were therefore entitled to.
Canada is a large country with a history of many people and cultures, both good, and bad. Louis Riel, one of the most controversial men in history, was not a hero; in fact he may have been the mere opposite. Riel, one of the most famous Metis leaders, is greatly viewed in the perspective of some, but he can also be viewed, as a true rebel, and someone who wasn’t a heroic Metis. Although Riel took part in joining Manitoba in the dominion of Canada, he also threatened the new dominion of Canada. Riel’s actions and decisions are very controversial, and although many regard his actions and decisions very highly, Riel did the opposite. Through the organization of the Riel rebellions, the executing of Thomas Scott, and going against the Canadian Government, Louis Riel was truly a rebel, who threatened the dominion of Canada.
He has been called a prophet, a traitor, a martyr, a visionary and a madman, but whatever one thinks of him, Louis Riel, remains one of the most controversial figures in Canadian history. Does this man who has continued to haunt Canadian history for more than a century after his execution, deserve all of those descriptions? After reading three different interpretations of the rebellions, it is still difficult to decide which is closer to the truth. All three authors retold the Metis history and although they differ on crucial issues, there was agreement on the basic facts. The primary difference amongst the three authors was whether the Canadian and Manitoban governments acted in good faith in carrying out the terms of the Manitoba Act, whether John A. MacDonald purposely deceived the Metis as to what Canada’s intentions were with respect to the Canada-Metis Agreement and to what extent were there deceptions in the administration of the Metis land grants. How these three historians attempt to encapsulate Riel’s life, accomplishments, and mistakes is very different. How they attempt to separate fact from fiction and decide whether Riel was justified in his actions against the government is written from three very different perspectives. Where their sympathies lie, how subjective they are and how they interpret the facts is quite evident, but there are many sides to history and every side must be examined if a fair judgment is to be made.
This change in mentality demonstrates how Riel is part of the living process of confederation. The unique relationship shared by Riel and the Canadian government also exists between Riel and the Métis. Previously, the Métis relied on Riel for his help in securing their rights and liberating them, going on to even ask him to go back to Canada during his exodus to Montana, in order to present a list of grievance to the Canadian government. This has changed today, where the province of Manitoba is self-reliant and the Métis people are able to garner support for their own causes. The changing situation of Riel’s treatment shows how as a result of the constantly changing process of confederation, we now treat him in a different way than we would have in the past. While Riel is a strong example of how confederation is very much a living process, Canadians and society today continues to influence Canada as much if not even more than the Founding Fathers did in the past. Even today, our feelings toward certain aspects of the government and confederation are still evolving and changing as we become more
... arrival in St. Laurent, the rebellion has started. Violence escalated from looting and taking hostages to open rebellion. It was only a matter of time before the badly-outnumbered rebels were killed. Riel, having fled the scene of the final battle surrendered on May 15, 1885. For his part in the two uprisings in Canada’s brief history. Riel was hanged on November 16, 1885 in Regina. And To this day Riels execution is a controversy between historians. In my opinion Riels execution in Canadian history was prejudiced and yet crucial because without Riels execution where will Canada be now? Just think about it. Imagine that riel gained supporters and the province of Canada was overthrown? Would the Canada that you and I know be still being here? Or would the province of Canada become part of America? We have no notion but this is the reason we study history isn’t?
The Red River Resistance was the result of the Canadian Government’s selfish desires for land. Without consent of the Métis, John A Macdonald purchased Rupert’s Land, the land of the Métis. Discontent, the Métis seized weapons from the Government to defend themselves during a rebellion against the Government. Riel and the Métis had no intention of rebellion; in fact, he was not opposed to the idea of Confederation as long as the Métis were granted a voice in parliament. However, by early December of 1869, Riel feared that the government was armed and prepared for a war. As a result, the Métis arrested several soldiers whom later attempted escape. Riel later executed Thomas Scott, a member of the rai...
In Canadian history there are many famous people. In my mind one really stands out among the rest. His name is Terry Fox and he is one of the greatest athlete to run on the face of this planet. Terry discovered he had cancer and then decided to run across Canada. He was a brave man who would take what the world through at him. Running across Canada was his way to show the world that he was not going out with out a fight.
On October 23, 1844, in Red River Manitoba, Louis Riel Sr and Julie Lagimodiere, devout Christians, brought a young Métis boy into the world. Little did they know, Louis Riel Jr. would grow up to become known to many as “the founder of Manitoba.” His life was filled with excitement, both political and personal. The question is, were his actions against the government acts of honor and truth, or deception and lies?
I hold my pen in hand to express my feelings of indebtedness towards you Mr. John Abbott. My name is Gabriel Dumont; I am an anti-European metis scholar and Lawyer. Dexterous at what I do, I became the advisor to Louis Riel and one of his closest friends. I was born in Red River between the years 1847-1849 (my exact birth date is unknown). Throughout my youth people found me to be quite intelligent. I was born to the second in command of the metis national committee. My father was an influential man. I studied law in Scotland, becoming one of the élite to my class. In 1865 I returned to my beloved home Red River. I became good friends with a young man named Joseph Clark; he was the man who introduced me to Louis Riel. Promptly Louis and I became fast friends; I was fascinated by Riels intellect and his skills of persuasion. I learned that my father and Louis’ father had been close friends in the past before my father’s unexpected death. In 1869 Riel had become the metis leader just like his father. I am confident that we the metis in Red River did a substantial deed for the thousands of metis scattered across Ruperts land to Assiniboia. By taking over Fort Garry my people and I had sole control of what had belonged to us for thousands of years,...
Tolvanen, A. (1992). The rise of Native Self-determination and the crisis of the Canadian Political Regime. Culture, Volume XII (No. 1), 63-77.
My first reason for saying that Louis Riel was a hero is that he was the founder of Manitoba which is why he said things like "I know that through the grace of God I am the founder of Manitoba" or “And the province of Manitoba? Without our provisional government it wo...
As the English colonizers began to expand into and around the French territory much quarreling arose and disputes over whose land it really was just added to the fire. The French started to build forts up and down their territory’s boarder. The French along with the Indians lead attacks against the English until they moved out of their territory. They French established a fort called Fort Le Boeuf just down river from Fort Duquesne next to lake Erie; this was already claimed as English territory. England sent Major George Washington to the region of Fort Duquesne to thwart the French from further expansion and to expel the from the area. While on a patrol for the French, Major Washington came upon a small group of Frenchmen, which he took for scouts. Major Washington ordere...