Literary Criticism In William Shakespeare's The House Of Asterion

1318 Words3 Pages

The individual is herein shown as lord and master of the world, of his own and unique world. A world that is at his disposal even until the final moment. The last verse, «I bequeath nothingness to no one», which works as testament (not from that who runs, not from that who abandons, but from that who destroys), goes beyond all of this, maximizing –or even better–making the coherence explicit: If he achieves his aim, there would not be nothing to be bequeathed nor anybody whom to bequeath. Because, in line with the metaphysics of the first person singular, for this individual and his world there have not ever been other than himself. If what it is is what it is for each one, thereby, what it is to be done is what each one believes that …show more content…

This seems to announce something that could be wrongly understood as a mere matter of literary style. As each one of us do Asterion looks at the world from its own perspective. The House of Asterion tries to recover it. The shape of the story is significant: unlike every author that preceded him, Borges writes the story –how could it be any different? – in the first person. That who tells the story is the individual itself, Asterion, who just like each one of us is unique. «The fact is that I am unique» (1993a, p.569), precisely declares. The only other, the only you is another self imitated by Asterion himself, another self that is not another self but himself: «…but of the games I play, the one I prefer is pretending there is another Asterion. I pretend that he has come to visit me and I show him around the house» (p.570). Asterion will say that his house «is the size of the world; better said, it is the world» (p.570) and is also unique: «here one will find a house like no other on the face of the Earth. (They who declare that in Egypt exists another similar are lying)» (p.569). …show more content…

There are different types of gods, so to speak. In order to better determine the differences of effectiveness among deified human individuals some advantage could be taken from the Hegelian distinction between Realität and Wirklichkeit –however, let´s leave its explanation for another time. In addition, another issue dig into according to the aforementioned presumption would be the relationship between the deification of human individuals with the efforts (conducted precisely by individuals) to deify certain cultures when, as accurately mentioned, “culture” is said in the plural form. Both famous and paradigmatic is, or was, the effort of Francis Fukuyama´s The End of History and the Last Man. Maybe that poem from Mario Benedetti «Lo dice Fukuyama» is enough to demystify that concrete and futile attempt of the former American Secretary of State and his followers, even though it could be also enough to demystify others that have appeared and are likely to appear. Maybe it is enough with the last five verses, and not just because (in its original version) they

Open Document