Literary Analysis Of Art Spiegelman's Maus As The Holocaust

871 Words2 Pages

It has always been difficult to write about historical events of such importance as the Holocaust. Undoubtedly, what happened was serious and should be treated as such; with respect and dignity. Works dealing with the Holocaust are subjected to careful inspections; writers that choose to portray this topic must tread carefully. Art Spiegelman’s work Maus is written in comic form and could be criticised about not being serious enough. But is that really the case?

The very form in which Maus is written, the form of a graphic novel, could be seen as highly controversial. The graphic novel is usually associated with fiction, which Maus most certainly is not. Throughout history, the comic has been used as a narrative form to depict both fiction and non- fiction; it has been known to have a great impact on masses of people, mainly due to its appeal to a huge readership. As comics use drawings and minimal amount of text to portray their message, the criticism that the subject could not be adequately handled in this form is understandable. And yet, Art Spiegelman manages to avoid the trap of …show more content…

His innovative methods of representation and use of narrative strategies do not mock, but shock. The seriousness of events is not diminished by drawing mice and cats, not is it degrading to preserve Vladek’s broken English. Spiegelman stays true to his father and his memories of the war, and thus honours his story and stories of many other survivals on a more personal level. He avoids sacrificing creativity and innovation by being too bleak to avoid criticism and offense. He makes his point clearly and concisely, leaving the readers with something to think about, which many more serious works fail to do. After all, as Adorno states in his less frequently quoted sentence: “Even the most extreme consciousness of doom threatens to degenerate into idle

Open Document