Another example is the case where Christopher Newton knowingly had himself arrested for burglary so that he could go to jail. He killed his cellmate for not wanting to finish playing chess games. He was sentenced to death by lethal injection. At first, it took 90 minutes to find an acceptable vein to inject the drugs. He was stuck with a needle at least ten times. He got up and went to the bathroom because the procedure took so long. Eventually when the shot was given correctly, he suffered two violent, irregular movements of the body, his stomach lifted, his mouth and chin trembled on the metal stretcher, which all of that should not have happened if he were given the medicine correctly (Richard 199-203). It took about 16 minutes for him to die. That is twice the amount of time it takes for drugs to kill a person. Aside from this, all of these killings are “cruel and unusual” deaths. It seems as if they were persecuted before dying.
A murderer name Bennie Demps was sentenced to death by lethal injection. The lethal injection was
…show more content…
But that is not always accurate; the court system makes mistakes because innocent people have been found guilty of crimes that they did not do and are put to death because they were wrongly accused. The wrongful deaths of innocent people is not right, and it can never be corrected. For example, Troy Davis was executed on September 21, 2011, for allegedly killing a police officer in Savannah, Georgia. In spite of the mistakes in his case, he was electrocuted anyhow. In his case, there were a lot of witnesses speaking against Mr. Davis. The witness stated in sworn affidavits that they were put under a lot of pressure by the cops into signing declarations or speaking against the convicted. Furthermore, at trial there was no evidence that connected Mr. Davis to the crime (Sarat
Throughout the history of man there has always existed a sort of rule pertaining to retribution for just and unjust acts. For the just came rewards, and for the unjust came punishments. This has been a law as old as time. One philosophy about the treatment of the unjust is most controversial in modern time and throughout our history; which is is the ethical decision of a death penalty. This controversial issue of punishment by death has been going on for centuries. It dates back to as early as 399 B.C.E., to when Socrates was forced to drink hemlock for his “corruption of the youth” and “impiety”.
In the minds of the American public and jurors in capital cases the perception of lethal injection is of a clean, clinical, and painless end. As stated in the article, Lethal Injection, seventy-one percent of those responding to a 2001 survey considered injection to be the least cruel form of execution (Lethal Injection). This perception is an advantage to the state because the public is much more willing to accept execution in this form and jurors are more willing to convict and pass the death sentence. At times it is understood why the death penalty would be considered in cases. Maybe the people are a threat to not only society but also to themselves, and need to be put to death so they can do no harm to anyone. Vickers gunned down a grocery store owner who was probably trying to make a living for himself and his family. Now this man is gone; his family is left in agony, and maybe Vickers deserves to die. Some people may say an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, but do two wrongs make a right?
Lavi (2005) explained how the mastering of medical techniques has caused the world of Law and Medicine to be intertwined:
Are there really innocent people on death row? At least twenty-three people have been executed who did not commit the crime they were accused of (JAICLC). And that 's only those that we know. And here lies a natural danger of capital punishment...when we execute an innocent person; the real killer is still on the streets, ready to victimize someone else. But when an innocent person is arrested, he is often the motivating reason behind further investigation, and if he is executed, than the case remains closed forever or until someone else gets killed by the real perpetrator. Often the only people who know what really happened are the accused and the dead. It then comes down to the skill of the examination and the defense lawyers as to whether there will be a conviction for accidental murder or for manslaughter. At times, a detective could naturally make an error and possibly lead to the conclusion that the innocent committed the crime. Whether it be multiple years in prison or even capital punishment there is no possible way of revenging or forgiving the judge and jury for this miscarriage of justice. There must always be the concern that the state can order the death penalty justly. In America, a prisoner can be on death row for many years awaiting the outcome of numerous appeals (Short). In simpler terms killing another being with or without evidence is not fair, decent, or ethically
The Death Penalty practice has always been a topic of major debate and ethical concern among citizens in society. The death penalty can be defined as the authorization to legally kill a person as punishment for committing a crime, this practice is also known as Capital Punishment. The purpose of creating a harsher punishment for criminals was to deter other people from committing atrocious crimes and it was also intended to serve as a way of incapacitation and retribution. In fact, deterrence, incapacitation, and retribution are some of the basic concepts in the justice system, which explain the intentions of creating punishments as a consequence for illegal conduct. In the United States, the Congress approved the federal death penalty on June 25, 1790 and according to the Death Penalty Focus (DPF, 2011) organization website “there have been 343 executions, two of which were women”.
There are many different reasons associated with the fact that there are still innocents being convicted with crimes they did not commit. At Northwestern Law School, in 2001, the Center of Wrongful Convictions studied the individual cases of 86 death row exonerees. Five top components were included: eyewitness error, where people have a faulty memory or are confused by the incident. Government misconduct, exemplified by the justice system(both police and the prosecution). Junk science, evidence being mishandled or studied by those who are unqualified in a trade where precision is of the utmost importance. A snitch testimony which is a trick and is normally given to those believing it is a reduction in their sentence. A false confession prompted by a mental illness or of those being clinically retarded, also stemming from police torture. Hearsay and circumstantial evidence also top the list as well.(2) When the irreversible sanc...
There are major problems with our criminal justice system. In the last one hundred years, there have been more than 75 documented cases of wrongful conviction of criminal homicide. According to a 1987 Stanford University survey, at least 23 Americans have been wrongly executed in the 20th century. For this very reason, the State of Illinois imposed a moratorium on the state?s death penalty in 2000 when it was discovered that 13 inmates on its Death Row were wrongly convicted. Anthony Porter, one of the 13, spent 15 years on Death Row and was within two days of being executed, before a group of Northwestern journalism students uncovered evidence that was used to prove his innocence.
The history of the death penalty is a long and brutal one. From the stoning and crucifixion killings
Many prisoners in the past have been known to be killed before they were proven innocent. Many documented cases where DNA testing showed that innocent people were put to death by the government. This sometimes happens because there are defendants who are given minimal legal attention by often minor qualified individuals. The government has made many mistakes which are being wrong about convicting someone for something they didn’t do, and killing this person for the wrong reason. Putting the wrong person to death is the biggest mistake that can be made and the government cannot afford to make this mistake.
Despite the fact that the United States Supreme Court has not yet dubbed the death penalty unconstitutional, it violates the Constitutional ban against cruel and unusual punishment, including torture. The botched execution of Clayton Lockett in Oklahoma is a good example of how the death penalty is considered a form of cruel and unusual punishment. When Lockett was injected with an untested mixture of drugs that were previously not used for lethal injections, he was declared unconscious ten minutes into the execution. He was reported to have writhed, groaned, and spoken a few words and also attempted to rise from the table 14 minutes after being injected. Even though the execution was halted 33 minutes into the execution, Lockett died of a heart attack 43 minutes after being sedated. An execution that uses the lethal injection usually takes about 5 to 18 minutes to kill the victim. The fact that it took that long for Lockett to die and seemed to cause him immense pain concludes that he was tortured to death, which is unconstitutional.
If an error occurs in the procedure, the criminal will face a painful and cruel death. Even more horrifying, an innocent person can be placed on death row. “The reality is that there are few innocent people on death row; the vast majority of these inmates did, in fact, commit the crimes for which they were found guilty. These killers brutally took the lives of innocent victims. By not recognizing the lives of their victims as sacred, they cannot claim their own lives are sacred. In the end, the death penalty is an individual punishment for an individual crime” (Bowman and DiLascio). Although this quote tries to offer a counterpoint to the argument that the death penalty should be abolished, it still admits that there are innocent people on death row. An innocent man placed on death row results in two casualties of innocent men while the brutal murderer sleeps peacefully each night. Errors in the death penalty can destroy families, terminate friendships, and disintegrate love and companionship. Since there is no guarantee that every person on death row is guilty, it is too dangerous to risk more innocent
“A Death in Texas” by Steve Earle is the true-life story of a friendship that occurred over ten
“Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in 1976, 138 innocent men and women have been released from the death row, including some who came within minutes of execution. In Missouri, Texas and Virginia investigations have been opened to determine if those states executed innocent men. To execute an innocent person is morally reprehensible; this risk we cannot
The justice system isn’t or will ever be perfect as the continuing evidence in sentencing death penalty to the innocent and mentally ill in many cases have occurred.
It must be remembered that criminals are real people too, which have. life and with it, the feeling of pain, fear and the loss of their loved ones and all the other emotions that the rest of us feel. There is no such thing as a humane way of putting someone to death. Every type of execution causes the prisoner physical suffering, some. methods perhaps cause less than others, but be in no doubt that being.