Kamo No Chogamy And Saigyo Comparison

1075 Words3 Pages

Although Kamo no Chomei and Saigyo are both poets with reclusive backgrounds, their distinct past has strong influence on to their interpretation of nature. Saigyo, originally name Norikiyo, came from a highly reputable military background who served the capital. Whereas, Kamo no Cho mei began his career as a poet in the imperial court. Transitioning from these high class social positions to a reclusive lifestyle, Saigyo and Kamo no Cho mei’s works display a controversial understanding of the nature of life. Throughout the translations of these two poet’s work by Lafleur and Cook, Saigyo and Kamo no Chomei draws upon a compelling understanding of nature through the themes of impermanence, desires, and suffering. The following essay …show more content…

Reflecting in solitude, Saigyo see this natural element of life associated with karmic repercussions. One example of desires reflected in Saigyo’s life is that even as a child to have a desire to become a warrior. In one of his waka, he described himself as a “mere child holding on a toy bamboo bow … longs to wear a warrior’s headgear” (Laleur 4). Holding a toy bow at such young age is representations of the deep desire to be a warrior and the fetish of the sword. As described in Saigyo poem, “swords … are gruesomely designed for hacking off … another’s body” (Laleur 135). This mean his desires to be a warrior would lead into a pathway of human slaughtering on the battlefield. The karmic repercussion for Saigyo’s desire to be a warrior is speculated to be an increase rejection of his identity and role. In one of poems in Awesome Nightfall, Saigyo expresses this distaste by enduring the “pain of looking at aftermath of war scenes as mental torture” ((Laleur 134). This traumatizing experience of executing violence may have had a profound impact on Saigyo decision to give up his desire to be a warrior in pursuit for buddhism. Living in solitude has given Saigyo a peaceful escape from this desire, which has allow him to avoid further karmic repercussions by becoming an anti-war …show more content…

In the account of ten-foot square hut, Cho mei interpretes desires not only as inevitable, but as “foolish endeavors” (Cook 625). According to Cho mei elaboration of his past in the capital, he saw people’s natural deep desire for reputation and wealth (Cook 625). By vividly describing the turmoil of series of natural disasters that destroy many people’s houses and valuable treasures, Cho mei suggests that the fascination with having these desires trouble the heart with distress and fear” (Cook 625). In contrast to Saigyo, Cho mei takes a further step in analyzing human’s desire for greed among the rich or poor will always be in discontentment (Cook 629). While it can seem this discontentment may be a karma for one’s greed, Cho mei also want people to realized how living in solitude allow him to become content with everything he has (Cook 629). This rejection of desires for wealth and reputation free the distress of capital life. Cho Mei’s elaborated on how even the challenges living in a hut that was 1/10 the size of his house back in capital provided a sense of relief with the quote, “I rest as I please, I dawdle as I like” (Cook

Open Document