Justice As Fairness Rhetorical Analysis

628 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: John rawls theory of justice equality of opportunity

Philosophy Assignment
Topic: Select a passage of your choice and explain it in 1000 words.
Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical is an essay by John Rawls publish in 1985. It consists of two main principles of liberty and equality with the second being subdivided into Fair Equality of Opportunity and the Difference Principle.
The passage selected by me was on Page 232 of Justice as Fairness by John Rawls. In this reading he tells us as to how justice should be fairly distributed in the society. It should be equally distributed in the society with no discrimination of caste, creed etc. In this he uses elements of both Kantian and Utilitarian philosophy and has described a method of evaluation of social and political institutions.
In …show more content…

Hence we can see that Rawls is identifying his vision of justice which is neither egalitarian nor laissez faire.
The passage chosen by me says that in a country citizens should have the power to understand what is good and what is bad. Rawls also says that the citizens are free in what they conceive of themselves and also of one another as having the moral power to have a conception of the good. However, citizens may change their conception of the good on moral grounds with valid reasons and their own desires.
Rawls explains the above concept with an example. He says that when citizens convert from one religion to another they do not follow the previous religion. From that moment onwards they follow the new religion. Yet they do not stop being the persons they were before. We should not discriminate between those people just because they changed their religious affiliation. They should still possess the rights and duties they possessed before changing. After changing their religion, they do not lose their identity. Rawls describes this by saying that there is no loss of public identity. The thing that he implies is that everyone in the society is equal irrespective of what religion they follow. They deserve an equal say in everything and their opinions should be taken into consideration. They will still have the same rights and duties which they had before changing their religion. They would still have the same property and make claims like before but the only difference is that earlier they were connected by religious

Show More
Related

  • John Rawls On Justice Analysis

    1184 Words  | 3 Pages

    Why does it matter? Why do humans harp on the topics of justice and equality consistently? The answers to above mentioned questions aren’t easy to formulate, and they open up a door to greater questions about morality, humanity and so forth. Humans live in a cooperative society. The aim of this body of organization is to advance as a whole and individually simultaneously. John Rawls’ states this goal of human society in Distributive Justice published in 1979: “We may think of the human society as a more or less self-sufficient association regulated by a common conception of justice and aimed at advancing the good of its members.” Hence, our society is shaped by an idea of justice – one that is applicable to all members of this society, and this set conception of justice promotes the advancement of the society and the individuals living in

    Read More

  • John Rawls and the Social Contract

    3640 Words  | 8 Pages

    ABSTRACT. Adapting the traditional social contract approach of earlier years to a more contemporary use, John Rawls initiated an unparaleled revitalization of social philosophy. Instead of arguing for the justification of civil authority or the form that it should take, Professor Rawls is more interested in the principles that actuate basic social institutions —he presupposes authority and instead focuses on its animation. In short, Rawls argues that “justice as fairness” should be that basic animating principle.

    Read More

  • John Rawls on Justice

    1425 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Rawls was a man who played an influential role in shaping political thought in the late 20th century. Rawls is accredited for writing two major contributions that has helped influence political ideology of those even today. His first piece was published in 1971, A Theory of Justice, which argues his belief of justice on the domestic level and also that reconciliation between liberty and equality must occur in order to have a just society . Rawls’s belief of what justice should be is extremely controversial, and helped put Rawls on the map. Later, after Rawls gained a reliable reputation he published another piece called, Law of the Peoples, which was his application of justice towards international affairs and what he believes America’s Foreign Policy should emulate. In this I will describe both of his works and then throughout I will offer a brief critique on both A Theory of Justice and Law of the Peoples.

    Read More

  • Rawls Principles Of Justice Essay

    1396 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rawls states that you cannot reimburse for the sufferings of the distressed by enhancing the joys of the successful. Fairness according to him occurs when the society makes sure that every individual is treated equally before the law and given a c...

    Read More

  • Rawls Theory Of Justice

    3346 Words  | 7 Pages

    INTRODUCTION John Rawls most famous work, A Theory of Justice, deals with a complex system of rules and principles. It introduces principles of justice to the world, principles which Rawls argues, are meant to create and strengthen equality while removing the inequality which exists within society. These principles are both meant as standalone laws and regulations, but they can be joined as well. The main function of the first principle is to ensure the liberty of every individual, while the second principle is meant to be the force for the removal of inequality through what Rawls calls distributive justice. I will begin this paper by making clear that this is a critique of Rawls and his principle of difference and not an attempt at a neutral analysis.

    Read More

  • Religious Freedom Restoration Act

    1871 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first way it can affect a person is as a citizen. Simply put, you should know your rights, whether you practice a religion or not. “Apathy or indifference to the freedoms we have will always lead to erosion of those freedoms”.

    Read More

  • Justice In John Rawls's Theory Of Justice

    1229 Words  | 3 Pages

    In John Rawls’ “Theory of Justice,” he describes important aspects of justice that are often times overlooked when trying to contain the controversy of justice. The main contribution that Rawls has to offer for equality and justice is his two principles of justice. The two principles of justice apply to the basic structure of society and govern rights and duties and attempt to help regulate the distribution of social and economic advantages. The first principle says that each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for others. This first principle has the ability to make the basic liberties of Americans equal, due to its emphasize on the topic of equality

    Read More

  • Theory Of Justice In John Rawls's Theory Of Justice

    2303 Words  | 5 Pages

    John Rawls’ Theory of Justice attempts to establish a fair and reasonable social account of social justice. To do this, he discusses two fundamental principles of justice, which if implemented into society, would guarantee a just and fair way of life. Rawls is mostly concerned with the social good (what is good and just), and his aim with the Theory of Justice is to provide a way that society could be one that is fair and just, while taking into consideration, a person’s primary goods (rights and liberties, opportunities, income and wealth, and the social bases of self-respect). The usage of these principles will lead to an acceptable basis of self-respect. That saying, if the two principles are fair and just, then the final primary good,

    Read More

  • An Ideal Society in John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice

    535 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice presents an ideal society based on several simple principles. While the system Rawls suggests is well constructed, it is not without its flaws. I will now attempt to explain Rawls’ idea of Justice as Fairness and explain where the system fails.

    Read More

  • John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice holds that a rational, mutually disinterested individual in the Original Position and given the task of establishing societal rules to maximise their own happiness throughout life, is liable to choose as their principles of justice a) guaranteed fundamental liberties and b) the nullification of social and economic disparities by universal equality of opportunities, which are to be of greatest benefit to the least advantaged members of society , . Rawls’ system of societal creation has both strengths and weaknesses, but is ultimately sound.

    Read More

  • John Rawls Veil Of Ignorance

    1452 Words  | 3 Pages

    The concept of justice as a virtue existing in any given society is one worth giving attention to, as it ensures that all people regardless of race, gender, and sexuality, be given equal opportunities under the law. As individuals we all possess certain differences that make us unique, such as intelligence, talent, social status, etc. These things result in preducies that people face and is the common reason why achieving justice is hard. By philosophical definition, Justice is the equal distribution of some good no matter if it is just or unjust. John Rawls, a liberal political philosopher, argues that each individual in a just society holds an inviolability which cannot be overridden by concerns for the well being of society as a whole.

    Read More

  • Distributive Justice By Robert Nozick And John Rawls

    1255 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...e achieved when the Liberty and Difference Principle are enacted with the veil of ignorance. On the contrary, Nozick argues that Rawls’s theory is exactly the sort of patterned principle that infringes upon individual liberty. As an alternative, Nozick provides his unpatterned principle as the ideal distribution of goods in a society. To me, Rawls’s argues his theory in a manner where his principles of justice are not only difficult to achieve, but ultimately are exceedingly deficient in providing general utility. The veil of ignorance has proved to be almost impossible as well as unethical. The Difference Principle in itself is unable to justly distribute property since it clearly violates an individual’s liberty. Since Rawls’s method of distributive justice is rendered unreasonable and inefficient, it leaves us with a clear answer derived from two disjunctions.

    Read More

  • Multicultural citizenship Will Kymlicka

    1082 Words  | 3 Pages

    Each religion has a different set of fundamental rules and rights. When moving from one place to another we tend to bring our ideologies and beliefs with us we do not leave them behind. There are many different cases as Will Kymlicka mentions in his books Multicultural citizenship, which I will be referring to throughout this essay. As humans we have certain types of needs one of which is the need to belong. Belong to a family, community, group or nation.

    Read More

  • The Original Position and the Veil of Ignorance

    1361 Words  | 3 Pages

    Political philosopher John Rawls believed that in order for society to function properly, there needs to be a social contract, which defines ‘justice as fairness’. Rawls believed that the social contract be created from an original position in which everyone decides on the rules for society behind a veil of ignorance. In this essay, it will be argued that the veil of ignorance is an important feature of the original position. First, the essay will describe what the veil of ignorance is. Secondly, it will look at what Rawls means by the original position. Thirdly, it will look at why the veil of ignorance is an important feature of the original position. Finally, the essay will present a criticism to the veil of ignorance and the original position and Rawls’ potential response to this.

    Read More

  • "Justice and Fairness"

    766 Words  | 2 Pages

    `Justice as Fairness' gives a lengthy description of the primary subject of justice, which states that it is "The way in which the major social institutions describe fundamental rights and duties and determine the division of advantages from social co operations." Put simply this means that, according to Rawls, social justice focuses on the basic structure of a society and its social institutions, its political constitution and its economic and social arrangements.

    Read More

More about Justice As Fairness Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document