Junot Diaz's How To Date A Browngirl, Blackgirl

1026 Words3 Pages

To deal with the concern of subjectivity and objectivity in Junot Diaz’s “How to Date a Browngirl, Blackgirl, Whitegirl, or Halfie” is actually to talk about a situation where appearances are manipulated to the degree that objectivity becomes impossible. The tale takes the guise of an instructional manual, purporting to provide advice as to how exactly to work or act depending upon the ethnicity and social course of the reader’s time. However, if the real function of “dating” is to attain perhaps not just real, but mental intimacy—that is, to really start to understand the individual one is courting (and vice versa)—then the advice of the tale becomes counter-productive. This then becomes the main irony and driving power of the tale. The prospective …show more content…

It additionally determines the girl’s behavior, or at minimum exactly what the audience should expect of the girl. Diaz peppers his instructions with advice as to exactly what to expect, such as “A halfie will tell you that her parents met in the movement” , “a local girl may have hips and a thick ass but she won’t be quick about letting you touch” and “A whitegirl might just give it up right then” . Therefore Diaz shows not just stereotypes and their possible for precision, but additionally the degree to which a person’s upbringing and battle can figure out his or her behavior. In doing therefore, Diaz emphasizes the means in which the social forces of competition and course undercut both individuality and objectivity. If our actions are determined by the social impacts put upon united states by our competition and course, where is there space for individuality? If our response to other individuals is determined by competition and social course, are we courting a person or a racial/social archetype? To deal with another individual being as a racial or social archetype instead than as a person is to trade in stereotypes. The narrator’s advice is predicated upon his subjective knowledge of teams (race/class), instead than the consideration of each individual being as a person, possessed of unique responses and desires. He plays at presenting the audience with objective truths (If she is this, she will work this method) however, if a reader appears beyond the respected tone, he or she can see that this advice is undoubtedly predicated upon the narrator’s subjective knowledge of these racial and social teams. This observation is additional evidenced by Diaz’s addition of a minute where the narrator’s advice falters and breaks down in the face of a woman whose actions move beyond the world

Open Document