Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

735 Words2 Pages

A great civilization may face tremors of external source, though the most fatal of all threats is internal weakness. That is the conjuration of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a work by William Shakespeare, arguably the most talented writer in the English language of all time. In this play Caesar is a powerful politician with the potential to be dubbed ruler of Rome. Unfortunately, he is slaughtered by his fellow nobles. Brutus, of those who has slain Caesar speaks before a crowd of plebeians (Roman commoners) of why he chose treason-it was for Rome; Caesar was ambitious. However, grief stricken and resolved for revenge, Mark Antony-proven to be Caesar’s only loyal supporter adjust the crowd for his own speech. One exulting Caesar’s name and good deeds. While spoiling the reputation of his murders, and recovering love for the lost Caesar, Antony speaks of which he defines as “what I do …show more content…

Antony moves the crowd from believing that they are well rid of Caesar to questioning his assassination. Through repetition of key words in contexts which change their meanings and through theatrical gestures, Antony sways the crowd to his position.
Antony redefines key words in his speech by using them in irregular context. Antony’s repetitive use of terms like honorable and ambitious leave obvious implications that require reconsiderations of these terms to better fit the substance in which he uses them. Antony quotes a sentence in Brutus’s speech: “Caesar was ambitious”, putting this statement to the test Anthony allows the plebeians to answer this idea themselves- “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general

Open Document