Julius Caesar: Hero Or Villain?

226 Words1 Page

Is Julius Caesar a hero or a villain? Many think Julius Caesar is a villain. Overall Julius Caesar is a hero, he helped the poor, expanded their territory,and brought peace to Rome.

For example, Julius Caesar had many organization, clubs, homes, programs, and public jobs.He gave the homeless and the poor jobs such as farming and construction to get money to provide homes and food for their family. Also, if you were a farmer who had lost your farm and land, you could show up for daily rations of food.

Another example, Julius Caesar made Rome bigger and stronger and better than ever before. Julius Caesar and his army took over places like Gual, Switzerland, Belgium, Italy, and Britain. By taking over this land he had no choice but to consider

Show More
Related

  • To What Extent Was Julius Caesar A Hero

    617 Words  | 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar was very heroic to the Roman people. He did a wonderful job in conquering

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar: Conqueror, General, Builder, Dictator for Life

    753 Words  | 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar, an important figure in Roman history, lived during the end of the Roman Republic. His actions would shape the world around him forever. He was an important figure because he grew the Roman Empire, he brought about the end of the Roman Republic , and was able to grow his status within his lifetime and become dictator for life.

    Read More

  • The Sacrilege: Caesar A Political Mastermind

    553 Words  | 2 Pages

    must not just make a plan, you must carry it out with his own manpower. He was

    Read More

  • Why Is Julius Caesar Unjustified

    669 Words  | 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar was a great military leader.He lead Rome to many victories.“He used it to change the world driven

    Read More

  • Augustus: Philanthropist or Self-Serving Leader?

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, Augustus has written his personal account and presented himself as popular and successful leader. He did many things that helped society as well as did many things that did nothing long term. Augustus may have done things for only the betterment of himself but they did pay off when it all came to an

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar, Power-Hungry Villain Or Kind-Hearted Hero?

    1266 Words  | 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar had that and more. He had the support of the Plebeian class because he worked with the people of Rome and wanted to see real change. Unlike many corrupt politicians during that time period that just wanted to benefit from their positions, Caesar wanted Rome to become stronger and better. During Caesar’s March on Rome, returning from Gaul, his army remained loyal to him rather than the city and government of Rome. They must have believed in and trusted him to make the best decisions for them. Why would they abandon their republic if they did not have a good reason? Shortly after he succeeded with his march on Rome to defeat his triumvirate member, Pompey, he was named Dictator for Life by the Senate. However, many of the Senate members did not want him to have that title because they were afraid he would become powerful enough to overthrow the Senate and become ultimate, supreme ruler. The Roman Senate was forced to bestow that honor upon him because of the political pressure from the Plebeian and slave classes. The common people put their support behind him because he planned to rebuild the republic from the bottom up, which would result in more money pouring in for the poor people. Not being liked by the Senate during that time, however, proved not to be beneficial, and the great leader was murdered by its members. The day of

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Outline

    759 Words  | 2 Pages

    By looking at Julius Caesar, one can see that he was very successful in many

    Read More

  • The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar - Tragic Hero

    488 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, I saw two main characters as tragic heroes. First, I saw Julius Caesar as a tragic hero because his will to gain power was so strong that he ended up losing his life for it. The fact that he could have been such a strong leader was destroyed when he was killed by conspirators. I saw Marcus Brutus as a second tragic hero in this play. Brutus was such a noble character that did not deserve to die. The main reason why he did die, however, was because he had led a conspiracy against Caesar and eventually killed him. These two characters were the tragic heroes of the play in my opinion.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Tragic Hero (Brutus)

    666 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the play the Life and Death of Julius Caesar (just as in all of Shakespeare’s tragedies) there is much death, much tragedy, and of course, a tragic hero. However unlike most of Shakespeare’s plays this time the tragic hero is not particularly obvious. Throughout the play a few main characters present themselves as possibilities for being the tragic hero. But as being a tragic hero is not only having a tragic flaw but also entails much more, there really is only one person to fit the mold. The character Brutus is born into power and is higher/better then we are. He has a tragic flaw that causes his downfall and at the end he realizes his mistake (a trait none of the other characters can really claim).

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar

    553 Words  | 2 Pages

    If there were to be a villain in the Tragedy of Julius Caesar Cassius would be it. Cassius is the character who first thought up of the conspiracy against Julius Caesar. His motives weren’t as noble as Brutus’ but he made Brutus believe they were. Cassius did whatever it took to get Brutus to join in the conspiracy. We can clearly see Cassius’ true nature by what he does and says in the play.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Greed

    750 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the beginning the roman empire was a vast empire and this lead to great leadership and a good army. The army had conquered many territories and made them believe they were powerful, and strong. By then the roman empire had become an immense territory and the Romans had become more powerful and rich in Europe. This leads to greediness in the roman reign. Julius Caesar was then turned into a greedy ruler. He didn't want to share an

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Julius Caesar

    905 Words  | 2 Pages

    Imagine it is the year 59 B.C.E., the greatest republic to date is collapsing and it seems it is doomed with a senate which does not care about its people. There seems to be no hope. But then comes a young man who has ideas of equality that could save the republic. That man is Julius Caesar. Conqueror of Gaul, Crosser of the Rubicon, member of the First Tiumbarant, Caesar was a brilliant politician and general. At the time, Rome was governed by Pompey and the senate. Both were in favor bettering themselves and not the poor people. Caesar was in favour of improving life for the lower class. This was not accepted by the senate or Pomey, making them question his ethics. As Caesar became more powerful, as when he conquered Gaul, Pompey and the senate began to plot. They could not have someone as dangerous as Caesar in Rome. Because of this, the senate planned and carried out an assassination attempt, and succeeded. This was only for the senate to maintain power and complete control over Rome. Along with caesar, a little bit of

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar - Tragic Hero

    655 Words  | 2 Pages

    	In Julius Caesar William Shakespeare illustrated Caesar as a tragic hero by showing that he was a noble man of high rank, by showing that he was a historical figure with a tragic flaw which lead to his downfall, and by showing that Caesar accepted his fate of death & achieved honor and respect in his death. There is a contradiction between who the main tragic hero of Julius Caesar is. Can there possibly be 2 main tragic heroes in one book? If Julius Caesar wasn’t the main tragic hero of the book then why is the book named after him?

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar - A Tragic Hero

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout many of Shakespeare's plays, a tragic hero is identified; a heroic figure that possesses a character flaw that leads to his defeat. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, there has been controversies over who is actually the tragic hero. Many people agree that Marcus Brutus is the tragic hero. However, others argue and identify Julius Caesar as the tragic hero. After examining these two characters, a conclusion is easily drawn. Brutus is the tragic hero of this play because when a person who possesses such heroic qualities dies, it is a true tragedy.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Character Analysis

    1533 Words  | 4 Pages

    A tragic hero is the antithesis for the common protagonist. Most protagonists show how they overcome great obstacles however, the tragic hero shows a more humane character, that stumbles and falls. The tragic hero usually exhibits three specific traits that lead to his or her downfall. In the play, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the characters of Brutus and Caesar both exhibit the three attributes of a tragic character. The first trait of any tragic hero is a high rank and potential for greatness. Both Brutus and Caesar hold his trait, as they are beloved high ranking Romans. The second characteristic a tragic hero must possess; is a fatal flaw that dominates their personality, and Brutus’ sense of justice and Caesar’s ego, fulfill this

    Read More

More about Julius Caesar: Hero Or Villain?

Open Document