In an article from Julia Fox with IU News, she expresses how The Daily Show in her opinion is just as substantial news as conventional news shows. Julia Fox's article helps give the other side if you will. The side of why people are tuning in and tuning away from regular news shows. Julia’s article explains why shows like the Daily Show are getting more and more viewer’s to tune in. She explains that the Daily Show made real news by having John Edwards announce his candacy on the show. More and more politicians are using these news sources to announce their political agendas. Even though the banter between the host and these politicians may seem a bit silly, it is still actual news.
This trend is catching more and more viewer’s attention
“Tuesday of the Other June” by Norma Fox Mazer is a fictional short story about a girl who struggles with being bullied and how to stick up for herself. In the beginning, June joins swim class where she faces her bully, who happens to have the same name. Soon, the bullying escalates but June is happy to know she will be moving. In the end, she has to go to school with her bully but ends up sticking up for herself and telling her to stop. June learned a lesson of how to stick up for herself and deal with bullies.
If your body was ninety percent artificial, would you still count yourself as human? The character Jenna Fox from the book The Adoration of Jenna Fox by Mary E. Pearson might have the answer. Jenna is a seventeen year old girl recovering from a traumatic accident, whose body has been replaced almost completely with prosthetics. In Jenna’s world, a limit is put on the amount of prosthetics one can receive, and Jenna has far surpassed it. Following her accident, her parents decided that the only way to save Jenna was to use an illegal amount of prosthetics on her. Their choice did not come without consequences however, as it heavily affected them and others around them, especially Jenna. The most important choice in the book was made by Jenna’s
In Episode 8 of Sarah Koenig’s podcast, Serial, Koenig claims that Jay isn’t a reliable enough source of information for the state to find Adnan guilty of the murder. She argues that there are too many inconsistencies in the story that he has told police over and over, and that there are too many problems in the story that the police use against Adnan.
Would you lose your journalistic integrity over one million dollars just to increase your audience base? For me personally I would decline the money and not subject my audience to an unwanted change for personal gain. Neil Postman’s book, “Amusing Ourselves to Death”, argues that television is all about entertainment and nothing else. Postman makes several points in his book pertaining to televised news as examples. On the evening of January 31 2018, I decided to test Postman’s arguments by tuning into the PBS NewsHour. After putting Postman’s arguments to the test I soon found that they were correct; “if it bleeds it leads”, news anchors are just actors, stories of little value get little air time, and there is an overwhelming disconnect between stories.
Murrow states “one of the basic troubles with radio and television news is that both instruments have grown up as an incompatible combination of show business, advertising and news” (7). Top management does not have time to give mature and thoughtful consideration to the abundant problems that confront those who are charged with the responsibility for news and public affairs, but they still do any ways and put little to none effort towards doing so. According to Murrow if there is a disagreement between the public interest and the corporate interest it will always go the way of the corporate almost every
Television, more so than any other form of communication, has been the ultimate tool of the propaganda effort. It is the trustworthiest medium to give us the subjective validity of our beliefs which can not be proven physically. It is the ultimate source from which we get evidence about objective reality, motivated by our desires to form an accurate view of this reality and to act correctly. United States is the biggest economical power in the world today, and consequently has the largest media and news industry. The gatekeepers of the American news industry control all the information, and decide what to publish or broadcast, based on the ideology and the structure of the institution. Therefore, whatever is presented in the news would probably be a part of the popular culture (created by the entertainment industry) or would serve it since the popular culture itself is created for the growth of the capitalist economy and the homogenization of the society, which are essential elements for a stable system. That is why the American media is terribly bias in many respects, especially in the matters of foreign affairs, driven by self b...
In the beginning of the 1960’s, talk shows were usually devoted to either light entertainment containing comedy, celebrity guests, and music or more serious discussions of the news and politics. They were created based on “controlled spontaneity.” Talk shows covered a variety of topics from the news to gossip, sports to religion, and hobbies to advice (Gregg, McDonogh, Wong). Hosts like Geraldo Rivera pursued formats that were similar to this; however, when Oprah was brought into the picture, she set herself apart from other talk shows of that time and changed daytime talk shows from being gossipy to intimate (News discovery).
Newspapers and nightly news shows have become a business. They no longer go by the public services values they once stood by (Sensationalism, 2005). Instead of being the fourth branch of government, they are just like any other money making business. It is no longer a race to put out the truth; it is more a race for dollars and control. Sensationalism is purely fueled by money and popularity. If a news outlet garners a large amount of popularity, they can swing votes, and influence voters. Sensationalism has already affected many political situations. Sensationalism has proven to spread like a virus. If sensationalism is not controlled, there is no way the news outlets can be the advocate for the people.
Politicians choose soft news because they know that they can achieve people who aren’t reach in traditional news media (Taniguchi 2011). Meaning of that all news are lighthearted or not serious. It is a plan to attract more people in different ways. Television shows, projects, a lot of events where politics want to get more sympathy for people. Moreover, political entertainment will be like performance, it is like an activity which concerned with participation, alternatives, implementation. The representation of politics on television can be seen as provoking the ‘affective intelligence’ that is vital to keep political involvement and activity going (Zoonen 2004). Politicians, parties are racing which get more votes from electorates so they need publicity and it is a reason why they participate in television’s shows and not serious
News can be defined as newsworthy information about recent events reported by the media. The definition of news often has individual’s eager to dig a little deeper and question “what makes news newsworthy?” Naturally, journalists have an increasing amount of competition in this particular field. If there are multiple newsworthy stories in one day over a similar topic, many are bound to be dropped or delayed. Editors and reporters have to do their best to ultimately decide what is interesting, exciting, and unique about a certain story that will make it prominent.
Many Americans today seem to be obsessed with the little things. Trivial thinkers are always trying to cover up issues or find short-term solutions. It is almost as if Americans can't stop and think about the future. We like reading and hearing about things that don't really make a difference. Walking into a grocery store, you can find lots of magazines filled with stories on celebrities, but how many do you find about world events? Can celebrities somehow help this world become a better place? Why do we need to know so much about their lives? Turning on your television, you can find talk shows filled with stories about other people's problems. Will knowing another person's problems help us become better people? Television now has special "news" shows devoted to Hollywood that never even talk about real world issues. How can we call these shows news programs?
Many studies, dating back to the early 1980s, have concluded that members of the national press are more liberal than the average citizen. Not only is the media more liberal, but they also tend to be more secular. Conservative media outlets have become more visible in recent years. More radio talk shows, such as those hosted by Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, are politically conservative. As well as some of the television reporting broadcast on Fox News, such as on the O’Reilly Factor. Limbaugh and Hannity have large audiences, and Fox News has grown in popularity (WDB
...oen, G., & Sahin, V. (2007). No Joke: A Comparison of Substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Broadcast Television Coverage of the 2004 Presidential Election Campaign. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(2), 213-227.
Scott, Gini, Graham. (1996) Can we Talk? The Power and Influence of Talk Shows. New
From the beginning days of the printing press to the always evolving internet of present day, the media has greatly evolved and changed over the years. No one can possibly overstate the influential power of the new media of television on the rest of the industry. Television continues to influence the media, which recently an era of comedic television shows that specialize in providing “fake news” has captivated. The groundbreaking The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and its spin-off The Colbert Report have successfully attracted the youth demographic and have become the new era’s leading political news source. By parodying news companies and satirizing the government, “fake news” has affected the media, the government, and its audience in such a way that Bill Moyers has claimed “you simply can’t understand American politics in the new millennium without The Daily Show,” that started it all (PBS).