John Wideman The Seat Not Taken Analysis

523 Words2 Pages

‘‘The Seat Not Taken’’ by John Edgar Wideman, is an article that was published in "The New York Times Newspaper" in 2010. He is a memoirist, novelist, and professor at Brown University. He is an African American man who takes the subway train from his home to work. For the past four years, he conducted an informal experiment which he noticed that people would ignore the empty seat beside him, because of his skin color. He uses his own experience, metaphors, and statistics to support his claim that even in this era racism still exist.

The author makes a connection between the election of Barack Obama and his experiences on the train. Stating he finds it hard that the citizens of America show disapproval of blacks, even though they have a …show more content…

If he included black women with his color the results might have been different. For example, more people like sitting next to women than a man.The article is a little bias because it is seen through his own eyes. But, the thesis statement introduces the topic well and gets the interest of the reader. The article impacted me as a reader because I started thinking about if something needs to be done, considering the situation and the authors view on racial division. For example, the end of the article the author mentions a poster that says see something, say something in the subway. As if to say something needs to change.
To conclude, this article is a cause and effect essay with an intended audience of middle class working people, like himself. The cause is that the author concluded that color explains a lot about his experiences. And the effect was that even with an African-American present, he would have a vacant seat beside him. He ruled out all the possibilities and reasons someone wouldn’t want to sit next to him and it turned into no other reason, other than his skin color in his mind. Although he didn’t mind the extra space the reason why the seat stayed empty was

Open Document