More handpicked essays just for you.
Mental disorder and crime essay
Mental illness as a factor influencing crime
Mental illness as a factor influencing crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1a. Bobby Smith’s charges
Bobby Smith should be charged with robbery and involuntary manslaughter for his theft, threat of serious bodily injury, and reckless actions leading to the death of the store clerk.
Robbery is defined as being theft of personal property in circumstances that involve either the infliction of serious bodily injury or the threat of such injury. In this case, Bobby threatened the store clerk with bodily injury, as he indicated that the water gun was filled with acid and the store clerk would be sprayed if he did not comply. For this charge, it is rather conspicuous that the prosecutor would be able to prove this, if provided the tangible evidence of the gun as well as evidence of the threat, either via surveillance footage
…show more content…
Jimmy Jones’ charges
Jimmy Jones could be charged as an accomplice in the death of the store clerk, as well as larceny.
Jimmy Jones could be charged as Bobby Smith’s accomplice in the death of the store clerk, as he assisted the principal during the commission of the crime, where the crime in question is the robbery. That being said, the prosecutor may encounter difficulties applying this charge to Jimmy, as he was unaware of Bobby’s possession of the water gun that inevitably led to the death of the store clerk. The prosecutor could advocate that the death of the store clerk occurred from the fight or flight response to the robbery itself, but the store clerk did not exhibit symptoms of a heart attack until after Bobby’s threat with the gun. Additionally, in order to convict Jimmy, the prosecutor must prove mens rea, providing evidence that Jimmy had a guilty mindset at the time of the crime. This is difficult to validate, as Jimmy stayed with the store clerk, called 911 and turned himself in. Thus, the accomplice charge might be difficult to
…show more content…
If the person was able to discern that the action was wrong but unable to stop themselves, they are to be found sane under the M’Naghten Rule. In order to decide if the M’Naghten Rule would define Emmanuel as sane or insane, it is essential to consider aspects that deem Emmanuel’s ability to discern right from wrong. Initially, it is reported that Emmanuel bludgeoned Sam as a result of becoming angry and confused, though at what is not stated. Before leaving the house, Emmanuel disposes of the evidence by placing the golf club and bloody clothes in a bathtub and submerging them in water. This is the first aspect that lends evidence that Emmanuel was able to see his behavior as wrong, and thus work to cover them up. Moreover, following the event when asked by others about the state of Sam, Emmanuel replies initially after the bludgeoning that he believes Sam is sleeping, and a day later tells the police that he killed Sam, but Sam would be back tomorrow. This lends suspicion that Emmanuel does not understand the repercussion of his actions, as if it is just a dream, and reality will resume later. Lastly, after weeks had gone by and Emmanuel’s medication had re-leveled the chemical balance in his brain, Emmanuel reflects on the events with tremendous guilt and grief.
On July 11th, 1975 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin a doctor by the name of Lester V. Salinsky, performed a surgery on the plaintiff, James Johnson. The surgery was took place at Misericordia Community Hospital (Misericordia), defendant, by Dr. Salinsky. Dr. Salinsky was scheduled to remove a pin fragment from the plaintiff’s right hip. However, “during the course of this surgery, the plaintiff’s common femoral nerve and artery were damaged causing a permanent paralytic condition of his right thigh muscles with resultant atrophy and weakness and loss of function” (Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital, n.d.). The plaintiff filed suit against Dr. Salinksy and Misericorida on October 13th, 1976, fifteen months after his unsuccessful surgery, which
“William Henry Furman, a twenty-six-year-old black man with a sixth grade education, was not what most people called a “bad” man,” (Herda 7). Furman was just laid off of his job and was struggling to find work. But there was none. Every job did not pay enough, or was a short term job. Eventually, depressed, hungry, and broke, Furman turned to breaking and entering and to petty thievery by means of survival. Furman was caught a few times and was given a light sentence. He was also examined by a psychiatrist and was determined to be mentally impaired, but not enough to go to a mental institution. But on August 11, 1967, Furman went to rob the house of twenty-nine-year-old William Joseph Micke, Jr. with his wife and five young children. When searching through the house, Furman made too much noise, which alerted Micke. Furman heard Micke walking down the stairs and pulled out his gun that he used for scaring people away. But Micke kept walking downwards. Not wanting to be caught, Furman tried to run away and tripped over an exposed cord. His gun discharged. The bullet ricocheted to the back door. On the other side, a body fell to the floor. William Joseph Micke Jr. was dead. “The police responded to the call quickly and, within minutes, they had apprehended Furman just down the street from the scene of the crime. The murders weapon was still in his pocket,” (Herda 9). Furman tried to plead guilty by insanity and the psychiatrists described him as legally insane. But then, several days later one of the psychiatrists revised their medical opinion. Because he was not insane, the case would go on. The state of Georgia charged him with murder and issued the death penalty. This was because Georgia state law stated that any form of murder is...
Dispatch advised me that a White male, who was wearing a gray tee-shirt with shorts was harassing customers at Murphy USA by "aggressively" panhandling and cursing. The complainant and employee at Murphy USA, Tammy Bruner, was requesting that the subject be trespassed if he was observed on the property. I was further advised that the subject had been panhandling several times at the location and he refused to leave when asked by management.
Layman had went off his medication a few weeks before the attack and he was experiencing worsening symptoms of schizophrenia and paranoid delusions in the days leading up to the crime, but his parents could not do anything about it since he was an adult. Layman claimed that he had heard voices telling him to “Get that kid,” and the judge agreed that Layman had a disease of mind and was incapable of comprehending the results of his actions or understanding the wrongness of his actions. The fact that Layman escaped from the scene may suggest that he knew what he was doing, but the fact that he did not even try to conceal his bloody clothes showed that he was “deprived of rational decision-making.” The boy who was attacked by Layman has survived and his parents said that he is “playing soccer again and doing well in school” and also that they hope Layman gets the help he needs before getting released from his detention at Waterford
At approximately 1850 hours, I approached Jackson approximately five spaces inside of the Westfield Shopping Town Blue Garage where I identified myself both verbally and with a badge as Nordstrom Loss Prevention. At this time Westfield Mall Security observed the apprehension. I then asked Jackson if he knew why I stopped him, Jackson was absolutely silent in which I asked him if he had a medical condition or if he understood my questions. Jackson shook his head ‘yes’ to asking if he understood me, I then asked Mall Security to assist me with the escort due to Jacksons strange behavior.
On an evening in February 1985, 15 year old Roderick Martineau and his friend Patrick Tremblay planned out to break and enter into another citizen’s home and rob them. For safety, the boys armed themselves with weapons, however they never planned on actually using them. Martineau carried a pellet gun and Tremblay carried a riffle. During the break in, Tremblay murdered both residents of the house (Mr. and Mrs. McLean). When Martineau asked why he did that Tremblay replied “I did not have my mask on and they saw my face”. Martineau was charged with second degree murder under section 213 of the code; however the question is whether or not he was arrested with the correct charge.
Jerry Jones was born October 13, 1942 currently 72 years old. He has a wife, Eugenia Jones with three kids: Stephen Jones, Charlotte Jones, and Jerry Jones Jr. He also has a sister, Jacquelyn Jones. Jerry Jones was born to Arminta and J.W. Jones in Los Angeles, California. He then moved to North Little Rock, Arkansas and that’s where he would grow up. Jerry went to school in North Little Rock High School, where he had played Running Back.
Jesse James was considered a legend of the old west of the mid 1800’s. He made himself a legend from robbing banks, trains, stagecoaches, and more. He supposedly did all of this trying to seek vengeance for the treatment southerners received from Union Soldiers. [History Net]
Wayne Bertram Williams, a native to Atlanta Georgia, was born May 27, 1958 (Case Study, n.d.). He became the focus of a police investigation that became known as the “Atlanta Child Murders” involving twenty-nine murders (Case Study, n.d.). Eventually, Williams was convicted of two counts of murder and is still the prime suspect in many others (Wayne Biography, 2015).
The court typically determines that probable cause can be inferred if an individual passes the cash registers and has possession of merchandise that has not been purchased. This is seen in Bowman v. Indiana, the store employee saw the suspect conceal a saw and “did not stop
It was April when I first began my criminal actions I let my ambitions take over to become rich and powerful. Later that year I moved to Chicago, where I knew some of my criminal associated pals, we started small from robbing stores, to stealing from the powerless. Later on I joined a gang our gang did the most god-awful things this was the way of becoming a gangster, We robbed a bank my biggest gain from that time my share was five million dollars this bumped me up to the boss of The Johnny Torrio’s gang. Furthermore into my life I remembered a pal named Jimmy Wells we made an appointment for the time being for twenty years. The next day I took a train to New York, where I have lived most of my youth.
March 31st at 6:10pm I as a detective receive a call from Captain Muldoon that Ernie Millers wife had fallen off the back porch and severely hurt herself. This happened at 554 Theresa Drive. I arrived There was no eye witness but the neighbor Mrs. Clever knows the wife Mrs. Miller very well. Mr. Miller’s alibi don’t really make since or adds up right, so imp going to take him into custody for second degree murder, which is a killing that is not planned or committed in a reasonable passion.
As juror number one, I had to research why Johnny should, or should not be tried for the murder of Bob Sheldon, the Soc. I also had to research murder among teens and what happened during the killing of Bob Sheldon. During my research, I found that murder was considered a premeditated killing, and I also found that Johnny can only be tried for murder in Connecticut, New York, and North Carolina because of his age. Johnny was planning on saving, Ponyboy Curtis, who at the time was being drowned by David, the Soc Bob had told him to “give Ponyboy a bath.” In trying to save Ponyboy he pulled out his pocket knife and stabbed Bob Sheldon in the back therefore causing David to release Ponyboy and flee the scene. After finding that information I also found that Bob Sheldon and his group of friends had stopped their car on The Greasers side of town and got out to show them a lesson for taking out their girls. ...
Before he committed the crime he was drinking and thinking about how angry he was at his wife for cheating on him. Smith took out his anger for his wife on the random women going to the restroom, proving that Smith´s intent was to harm the women after being harmed by his wife and the cheating
The definition of abnormal will be reviewed in relation to each defence. In order to identify how these three defences compare and contrast, it is first important to understand their definition and application. The appropriate defence will be used once the facts of the cases have been distinguished and they meet the legal tests. The legal test of insanity is set out in M’Naghten’s Case: “to establish a defence.of insanity it must be clearly proved that, at the time of committing the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.” To be specific, the defect of reason arises when the defendant is incapable of exercising normal reasoning