Nicholas Layman Case Study

1308 Words3 Pages

On January 20, 2016, a Newfoundland Provincial court Judge Colin Flynn ruled that Nicholas Layman, a 20-year-old man who was charged with attempted murder, aggravated assault and assault with a weapon, is not criminally responsible due to his mental disorder. On September 25, 2014, an 11-year-old boy was playing soccer on a soccer field with more than 20 other kids, with their parents watching, and Layman ran out to the field and stabbed him several times in the chest and neck with a kitchen knife. Layman then took off in a vehicle after jumping over a fence, and was arrested 90 minutes later near his mother’s house. Layman’s parents said that he had been diagnosed with schizophrenia a year before the stabbing, but the mental health professionals did not give them clear information about his treatment and thus he could not get the help he needed. …show more content…

Layman had went off his medication a few weeks before the attack and he was experiencing worsening symptoms of schizophrenia and paranoid delusions in the days leading up to the crime, but his parents could not do anything about it since he was an adult. Layman claimed that he had heard voices telling him to “Get that kid,” and the judge agreed that Layman had a disease of mind and was incapable of comprehending the results of his actions or understanding the wrongness of his actions. The fact that Layman escaped from the scene may suggest that he knew what he was doing, but the fact that he did not even try to conceal his bloody clothes showed that he was “deprived of rational decision-making.” The boy who was attacked by Layman has survived and his parents said that he is “playing soccer again and doing well in school” and also that they hope Layman gets the help he needs before getting released from his detention at Waterford

Open Document