Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of technology in the present world
The effect of technology
The effect of technology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of technology in the present world
Falsifying a Résume
Always tell the truth comes with the saying, “that way you don’t have to remember what you said.” With modern day social media connections and the internet filled with instant data the ability for individuals to obtain information on falsifying résumés is a mouse click away. Technology and the unrestricted flow of information gives individuals pursuing employment endless opportunities to explore occupations. Personal information in relation to individual résumés can be presented ethically or unethically depending on the prospective candidate. Whether information is included or excluded in the résumé can be examples of personal characteristics that represent the individual. The honest character of an employee can be examined through the guidelines of his or her resume. In finding the right employees for jobs companies search the prospective hires by using background checks from information stated on the résumé. Background checks and specialized inquiries into an individual’s past search for irregularities in character and help protect a company’s legal interests from penalties resulting from lawsuits. These processes filter out untruthful applicants and save the company money. On occasion applicants falsify their résumés, this occurs for numerous reasons, statistics show increases in deceitful representations continues to grow. A business manager must set ethical expectations during the résumé process they are a central part of hiring and firing. The ethical and legal repercussions for falsifying a résumé can greatly affect the future employment of prospective employees damaging both their careers and the reputation of a business. The Resume represents not only the individual but also the company and that rep...
... middle of paper ...
...o have a license to do something when in fact you don't. If you send out a resume for a job as an airline pilot and you in fact don't have a pilot's license then you may have a problem. Even then however the real crime would to actually fly the plane without the license rather than putting it on your resume. Another situation where you could be breaking the law by lying on your resume is if you are actually committing fraud. Again this has less to do with what you actually put on your resume than it does with using false documents to back it up. For example if you claim to have a degree from a certain college then you are not breaking the law however if they ask to see a diploma or transcripts to prove it and you fake these then you are breaking the law.
Resources
Background Check Services Review." 2014. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Nov. 2013.
The use of criminal record databases by employers has greatly increased since the 1990s when the information first became relevant (Appelbaum, 2015). The biggest rise in background searches began after the terrorist attacks in New York City on September 11, 2001. Mr. Uggen, a criminologist at the University of Minnesota, states that there is a problem with criminal background checks considering most employers have no idea what they should be looking for. With every business owner having different concerns about potential applicants, “we haven’t really figured out what a disqualifying offense should be for particular activities (Appelbaum,
According to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, lying means to tell an account of an untrue event or give false information.
“Most people in the U.S. want to do the right thing, and they want others to do the right thing. Thus, reputation and trust are important to pretty much everyone individuals and organizations. However, individuals do have different values, attributes, and priorities that guide their decisions and behavior. Taken to an extreme, almost any personal value, attribute, or priority can “cause” an ethical breach (e.g. risk taking, love of money or sta...
“People are often described as the weakest link in any security system” ("Human Resources Security (ISO 8) - Information Security Guide - Internet2 Wiki", n.d.). This quote sums up the importance of verifying a candidate’s risk level prior to hiring. An organization’s information assets are critical to the organization’s operation and security. In addition to validating a candidate’s legitimacy, the interviewers and hiring managers must be careful to not divulge too much information during the hiring process that may put the organization’s syst...
Resume fraud or misinterpretation of a person’s qualification is considered as a criminal offense. Those employees who are deceptive in regards to their qualification might be considered in what is viewed as the breach of the duty of trust that is implied in all employment contracts (Winfield, 2013). The non-disclosure or false disclosure is a criminal offense that can lead to intentional fraudulent misinterpretation of a certain piece of information that is responsible for inducing the employer to hire an individual (Winfield, 2013). It is possible for King to be found guilty of fraud. Resume fraud is a certain type of fraud that may carry criminal or civil penalties or even both depending on jurisdiction. I believe that it is likely that King will be found guilty of resume fraud where she intentionally misrepresented information in her resume so that to prove she completed her MBA while in reality, she was 12 credits away from completing her degree. Because of this, the company can terminate her employment following application of the doctrine of employment at will. Some of the legal implications include destroying the reputation of the company and affecting the job performance of other employees, which in return will negatively affect company performance
Lerner discusses "deliberately making untrue statements." This is the worst form of deception and the most unacceptable. When telling this type of lie, you are not fibbing or distorting the truth, you are blatantly giving false information. You are blatantly lying. Lerner uses the Anita Hill case as an example and how, Hill and Mr. Clarence Thomas told two completely different stories under oath. Therefore, one of them was deliberately making untrue statements. This form of lie is completely unacceptable.
Lying is intentionally misleading a single person or group of people with a deceptive statement or action. “The moral question of whether you are lying or not is not settle by established by establishing the truth or falsity of what you say. In order to settle this question, we must know whether you intend your statement to mislead.(Chapter 1 pg. 6) When it comes down to trying to decide whether you should justify or reject a lie there are several steps you should take. You need to be able to defend your arguments for your lie in a public setting against an audience or your peers, or what Bok considers “reasonable persons”. You cannot just be able to justify your lie to yourself because then it is automatically invalid. As humans we tend to
Reading your response to this case you brought up an interesting topic of the hiring or recruitment process not being able to develop a good insight into a person’s ethical competence and behavior well enough versus during performance evaluations. Nurses make ethical decisions as part of their nursing requirement and that is also a reason for completing background checks from past employers. It helps to find out how a person's professionalism and ethical decision-making competence stand up to other candidates. According to Cerit and Dinc (2013), experience, cultural background, autonomy and competency are factors that affect how a nurse responds to ethical problems and their professional conduct. However, even though nurses are expected to
What you don’t know can hurt you when it comes to hiring. The Society for Human Resource Management has reported that 50 percent of all applicants have submitted false information to gain employment. Information on a job application or resume can be detrimental and costly to a business if not verified in advance of hiring.
Though itmay seem absurd, a concise two-page summary of the self has been the driving force in our livelihoodsfor generations. Begrudgingly, we write the resume, seldom answering the question of why it hasbecome necessary that we reduce ourselves to our essential skills, and package and market ourselvesto someone who will spend less than thirty seconds reviewing “us.” Out of necessity for job seekers tocommunicate quickly and efficiently with potential employers, the structure and guidelines for thegenre of resumes have emerged. These structures and guidelines, in turn, respond to and reflect ourcultural ideologies. As Bernadette Longo has noted about the cultural nature of texts, such “largersocial relations may not appear directly because we have misrecognized many of them as naturalstates of affairs, being enmeshed in intricate webs of institutional influences that appear inevitable”(Longo 25). Resumes are one of these enmeshed, cultural artifacts that contribute to and participate inthe knowledge, power, and social systems we have constructed. An exploration of an emerging form ofthe resume—the scannable resume—will help to examine these concepts, allowing a discussion of theassumptions of cultural norms, epistemologies, and social relations embedded within this genre.The genreThe resume is a representation of the self, abbreviated, bulleted, and in standard serif fonts.Through highlighting relevant experience and qualifications, its main goal is to win its author aninterview with a prospective employer. In the neo-Darwinian business world, it is presumed that theemployer does not know the author, and that the employer n...
Over the years, an increasing number of Americans use social media to express their daily life. Employers have become increasingly concerned about how employees and potential employees are posting on social media. A background check shows a person criminal records or financial records but it doesn 't give an insight on who the person is truly is. Employer’s should have the right to request social media passwords from prospective employees. Employers ask for employees social media password because it allows them to see the workers posting offensive messages or negative statements about the company, keep tabs on the employees, whether they are on duty or off, and see if the potential employee is professional or a qualified job applicants.
If you make the claim that you have never told a lie in your life, then you are a liar. Even if you do not try to make that claim, you are still a liar. This statement may seem harsh and uncomfortable, but often times, the truth is not a warm and fuzzy place.
One way employers can act ethically toward job candidates is to preserve the privacy and confidentiality of personal information and/or the results of any assessments taken as part of a selection process. This may be accomplished by maintaining test security and making reasonable efforts to establish the integrity of test materials or other assessment resources in an ethical manner (American Psychological Association [APA], 2010). In addition to privacy and confidentiality, employers should obtain consent from applicants prior to administering any form of test or assessment (APA, 2010; Cascio & Aguinis, 2011). Although employers may have certain policies or guidelines outlining acceptable behavior toward job candidates, these would be in addition to ethical guidelines of HRM or I/O practitioners who may take part in the process. Any type of assessment that is involved with the selection process should directly
Recently, a hospital employee was fired because a supervisor at the hospital looked at her social media account and saw that the nurse was discussing patients on Facebook. This not only violated the hospital policy, but also the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The backside to looking at accounts before hiring is that companies could discriminate against religious beliefs, ethnicity or sexual preference. Lewis Maltby argues that social media searches like that are considered “fishing expeditions” and that the company shouldn’t be concerned about what he/she does outside of work, as long as they are performing well at their job, they should be good to go. But it is simply not that, many bosses are concerned that their home life may be brought into their job and wish to monitor to check on the employee’s well being. As an example, if hiring a police officer and look on their Facebook only to find that they belong to a lot of racist groups, it wouldn’t be good. Usually when companies are looking at social media accounts, they look at legitimate business reasons for rejecting the
I agree with the statement "honesty is the best policy". People will be able to trust people who are honest, liars will have rumors spread around about them, and it's just plain easier to tell the truth. Nobody likes people who lie all the time and won't know whether to trust them or not. People get annoyed by people who lie a lot.