Incest From Jane Austen To Virginia Woolf

1570 Words4 Pages

Incest has long been considered as taboo. Almost every country has restrictions and laws condemning incestuous relationships/marriages. These relationships between siblings, parents and even distant relative are often thought of in a negative light. Yet, despite the social rejection of incestuous relationships nowadays, there was a time when interfamilial relationships were accepted. In this essay, we will explore the subject of incest through two academic disciplines – literature and criminal justice. More specifically, we will examine one scholarly work for each discipline: Family Likeness: Sex, Marriage and Incest from Jane Austen to Virginia Woolf by Mary Jean Corbett, which uses examples from literature to explore the topic of incest and …show more content…

Her main evidence are passages from novels such as Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre3, George Eliot’s The Mill on the Floss4 and Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park5 as her evidence. Corbett also refers to other literary works such as speeches, pamphlets and essays written by other literary scholars. In one chapter of the book, Corbett uses Adrian Desmond and James Moore’s essay, Darwin: The Life of a Torments Evolutionist, to explain interbreeding. Although her main evidence is in the discipline of literature, she also uses evidence from other academic subjects. Oftentimes, Corbett takes an analysis from other scholars and explains how their analysis reinforces her theories and ideas. For example, she uses Michael Foucault’s quote, “sexuality is originally, historically bourgeois” to reinforce her belief that class and wealth played a role in incestuous relationships. Corbett also gives us a little bit of historical background and explains the laws regarding incest to help readers understand changing opinions on incest throughout the nineteenth century. Her primary evidence does have limitations. Corbett states that her choice of novels only includes those written by women due to time …show more content…

While Corbett’s purpose was to explore the changes of incest, Dubber’s purpose is to analyze incest through the perspective of law and police. The law questions the legality of incest; police officers only serve to control and monitor incest. Dubber argues that because “incest as a distinct offence appears to be patently incompatible with the basic principle of law as law – autonomy or self government…” (737), incest is a matter of police rather than law. Based on his reasoning, it seems as if his purpose is to also convince people that his argument makes

Open Document