Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of the battle of yorktown
About the American civil war
The impact of the battle of yorktown
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of the battle of yorktown
During the Civil War, a young nation was divided. Families were torn apart, brothers fighting brothers. There was no neutral ground. Everything was split, including the United States Military Academy. Previous classmates at West Point, bound together by principles and virtues would now face the inconceivable: fight each other in battle. The history of West Point leads back to the American Revolutionary War. West Point was a key fort on the west bank of the Hudson River. It was considered to be the most strategic location in America, but was sold away to the British by Benedict Arnold, a notorious traitor. However, the fort remained in American hands until the end. After the war, George Washington noticed the unprofessionalism and lack of discipline …show more content…
Therefore, character building at West Point was enforced with a strict code of honesty and disobedience would result in “demerits”. If any cadet received 200 demerits in one year, then he would be expelled. In one instance, Ulysses S. Grant received 8 demerits for not going to church. Also, George Armstrong Custer lost track of his demerits as he was thought of as the prankster. One day in Spanish class, Custer asked the teacher to translate “dismissed” in Spanish. The teacher complied and then Custer left the classroom. On the other hand, George McClellan received very few and Robert E. Lee received none as he was referred to as “The Marble Model”. (Civil War Journal: West Point Classmates-Civil War Enemies) Position in class on graduation was of the utmost …show more content…
Generals during the war had to put their rigorous training to use and implemented their tactics. West Point taught them character, honesty, and above all, they were Americans. There was a bond between cadets as it was an important factor that got them through the war. Even at Lee’s surrender, Grant did not mention unconditional surrender and even offered to bring Lee’s starving army food. This was thought of as a West Point gesture. All these factors can be traced back to what these men learned at West Point. Brothers in tradition, enemies on the battlefield, it was the West Pointers that ended the war and shaped the future of our
As students, studying battles such as this, we have the advantage of hindsight, knowing the outcome. Nonetheless, we can still learn valuable lessons from it. To do so, this analysis will explore some of the decisions of the leaders at Gettysburg, and how they were affected by the operational variables. This essay will scrutinize some of the leaders at Gettysburg, and the impact of their actions. The outcome of this analysis will show that what was true in 1863 is still true today.
General Grant’s military skills were gained throughout his life as a soldier. All of these skills were used as he defeated countless enemies and won major battles. His expertise’s led him to victories throughout the whole war, which ultimately helped him play a major role in the Union victory. Grant started his military career in May 1839, at the military academy called WestPoint. He didn’t want to go to the academy; however, his father, Jesse Grant, forced him to go.
...didn’t over step his authority or attempt to subvert the army for his own purposes. Instead, George Washington sets the example of the military commander who was subservient to civilian political leadership. He also showed patience and coolness in the face of adversity. On many occasions in the book, the author cites Washington’s expressions of doubt and fears of failure, yet Washington never showed fear or doubt in action in front of his troops.
Washington's selection to be the leader of the Continental Army was the wisest choice that the newly formed Continental Congress could have made. Washington's selection as Commander of the Continental Army did more to win the Revolutionary war than any other decision made during the conflict. His personal character epitomizes perfectly the five traits required in a successful general: wisdom, sincerity, humanity, courage, and strictness. (Sun Tzu p. 65) These five crucial traits will become apparent and Washington's strategy to win the War of Independence is elaborated on further
George Washington was selected Commander in Chief of the Continental Army because of his courage and bravery, his ability to motivate and command respect from his followers, and his strategic ability in battle. His reputation as a daring and successful leader inspired confidence and loyalty in his followers. If it weren't for George Washington, it would be a different America today.
Here we are in the midst of the civil war as the country is divided and tensions are high. Then, like a phoenix out of the ashes comes a military name that will be remembered for generations to come – George Armstrong Custer. This is the man who, while young, made it a point to have no fear on the battlefront and led his men with a firm hand. He gave his men the inspiration and zeal to fight and be victorious even in the worst of situations. As we examine the life of George Custer, his thirty-seven short years on this earth, and his last stand at the Battle of Little Big Horn we will see how his bravery and selflessness earned him the title of one of the greatest generals the Union ever knew.
A military genius, Grant possessed the vision to see that modern warfare requires total application of military and economic strength and was thus able to lead the Union to victory. In civilian life, however, he was unable to provide the leadership necessary for a growing industrial nation, even though he always retained the affection of the American public.
Grant has an illustrious past. People talked about his being a drunkard but Catton says “He was simply a man infinitely more complex then most people could realize.” Grant, even though he was a West Point graduate, never wanted to be a soldier or to have a life in the military. He wanted to be a teacher. What Grant did bring to the Army of the Potomac was his ability to relate to the soldiers and made them his army. He completely retrained and re-organized the armies, and re-enlisted troops that were going to go home. They all realized that under Grant the Army of the Potomac changed which meant now that the entire war would change.
He suffered from stage fright and often “blushed and faltered”, (18) even at his inauguration as President, “he trembled and several times could scarce make out to read his speech” (18) This weakness of his is often glossed over as it doesn’t seem to fit in with his image as the towering, imposing “founding father”. Yet today, it is essential for a President to be able to deliver impressive and clear speeches to the whole country. Finally there are some criticisms that he was not as effective General as is often believed. Thomas Paine claimed that he was a bad general whose strategy consisted of “doing nothing” (19). Although Paine had a personal agenda in condemning George Washington as he resented not being appointed Postmaster-General, and then later by not being rescued from French persecution by the government, it is true that George Washington did lose more battles than he won (20) and often did seem to do nothing for long periods of time. There is also the issue of his harsh treatment towards his own soldiers, any who were caught deserting or plundering were “flogged” (21) and he even a “Gallows near forty feet high erected” to terrify the rest into obedience.
Great generals are crucial to the prospering of a nation. They impart unity to a country and defend against any enemy it may encounter. There are two wars showcasing such brilliant generals in American history: the Revolutionary War and the Civil War. In one, the English colonists on the continent of North America broke off from their mother country to form their own. In the other, the nation of the United States, having been firmly established at that point, was fighting against itself over the issue of slavery. In both instances, the people needed strong, brave, and selfless generals to lead them through their trials. Generals George Washington of the Revolutionary War and Ulysses Grant of the Civil War are excellent exemplars of these qualities. While both generals were successful in their respective wars and are two of the greatest generals of American history, George Washington was superior to Ulysses Grant in several ways, including early successes, war strategies, effectiveness, and leadership.
During the month of September in 1886, now 2nd Lt. Pershing arrives for duty with 6th Cavalry at Fort Bayard, New Mexico. He was also present during the tragic Wounded Knee campaign (Channel, 2014). Pershing is then appointed to the University of Nebraska as Professor of Military Science and Tactics. He dedicates four years to educating the young minds of the Military, encountering future US Vice-President Charles Dawes and someone who will also be a subordinate general officer (Vandiver, 1977). In tandem with his duties, he would also study Law at Nebraska University. (Pershing, 2013) Soon Pershing would be posted all over the American Southwest. During his diverse Army career, Pershing executed frontier duty versus the Sioux and Apache from 1886-90 (Perry, 2011). Pershing, when assigned to the 10th Cavalry, fought at El Carney-San Juan Hill in the Cuban War in 1898, which was fame to Teddy Roosevelt and earn him the nick name “Black Jack” (Channe...
The three generals that led in the Battle of the Wilderness were very bright generals. Robert Edward Lee (the confederates leader) was born in Stratford hall, VA on January 19th, 1807 and died on October 12, 1870 in Lexington city, VA. Robert was raised by Anne Hill Carter Lee (mother) and Henry Lee III (father). He grew up with his sister Sydney smith Lee. After Robert graduated west point military academy (finished second in his class). He got married to Mary Anna Custis in the summer of 1830. Together they bore 7 kids. Robert was favored to do great things in the military just like his father (“light-horse Harry”). He was part of the Mexican-American war (in 1864) and was a Confederate General for many battles of the civil war including The Battle of the Wilderness. Lee was joined by his horse Traveller.Two days before the first attack started, causing the start of the Battle of the Wilderness, Robert E. Lee had already begun scouting George G. Meade’s troops. On May 4th, L...
For a united nation to prosper, its people must overcome obstacles and take on numerous responsibilities. Throughout our lives, there are problems occurring continually in our world related to war and combat. During these times of hardship, we must remind ourselves to persevere and continue to defend the country. In addressing the Sylvanus Thayer Award on May 12, 1962, at the city of West Point, New York, General Douglas MacArthur urged Americans to remember the major responsibilities we have as Americans in his speech Duty, Honor, Country. With a position of authority, MacArthur powerfully stated that America will only survive through winning wars and fulfilling our duties. His main priority was to defend the nation, respect the nation, and prosper in that vast nation, otherwise remarked as three key terms: duty, honor, and country. Through the use of rhetorical devices, MacArthur expresses the theme that Americans should defend the country sturdily and carry on its numerous objectives by means of his moral code: “Duty, Honor, Country”.
Many people left the army or got sick and died. Everyone who stayed was valuable. In the background essay, it was said that "Washington was having trouble keeping his soldiers in the army." Soldiers left his army because their contracts were up and they did not want to stay any longer. Thomas Paine reasoned in Document D that "these are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country..." and he was right. Anyone who did leave was only there during the warm, summer months when
"His mind was great and powerful, without being of the very first order; his penetration strong . . . Perhaps the strongest feature in his character was prudence, never acting until every circumstance, every consideration, was maturely weighed; refraining if he saw a doubt, but, when once decided, going through with his purpose, whatever obstacles opposed." (Thomas Jefferson, as cited in "George Washington," 2006, para.19) George Washington is one of the most recognized and famous leaders in all history of the United States of America. He contributed greatly to the establishment of this prosperous country, from leading the Revolutionary armies into battle, to running the country as the first president, Washington has set precedence and example for all who have and are yet to follow. He was a noble man who demonstrated characteristics one would expect from a hero figure. He was not power-hungry, but did things and played his role for the good of the country, for patriotic purposes, to help America become the success it is today. In March of 1783, the soldiers of the American military were restless, bored and in a terrible state of doubt and distrust concerning the newly formed congress of the country. When these soldiers joined the army, they were promised a certain amount of money according to their service, but by the war's end, congress was nearly broke and not in a position to pay them all they had earned. The soldiers planned a rebellion against congress for their unjust treatment, and attempted to hold an unauthorized meeting of the officers on the matter. Washington forbade the meeting, but called for one a few days later, in which he gave his speech concerning the Newburgh Conspiracy ("The Rise and Fall," 2006, para.2). General Washington was a highly respected man among his peers, soldiers, and fellow men. His opinions, approval, and presence alone were enough to validate many plans, documents, and meetings throughout his life, so it is no wonder that even simple words or acts performed by General Washington were respected, and more often than not, taken to heart by his audience; perhaps this is why it may seem surprising that one of the most important speeches he ever gave fell on relatively deaf ears, leaving the audience hesitant, confused, seemingly unaffected by his powerful use of diction, and emotional appeal.