Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chomsky's theory on language development
Full analysis of animal communication
Full analysis of animal communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Chomsky's theory on language development
1. Introduction
The world still revolves around many unanswered mysteries. Through time and science, some have been illuminated and understood, but many are still left unexplained. One of these mysteries is the mind. In this essay I am going to be examining the relationship between animal communication, and our own human language. I will be discussing relevant theories such as evolution from animals and whether or not animals have minds, therefore debating the mind body problem and consciousness, which was most famously addressed by René Descartes as well as many other philosophers. I will also be studying Noam Chomsky’s theories on human language structure and generative grammar that oppose the ideas of various philosophers. Included within this topic I will research Washoe and Nim Chimsky, chimpanzees who were the primary focus of studies of animal language acquisition. The aim of this essay is to see if there is a relationship between human language and animal communication, based on evidence and theories that I will be researching.
2. My research question for this essay is
If humans and animals are so alike, in so many different ways, why can’t we speak the same language? I know that I often find myself attempting to have a full conversation with my dog, wondering if she understands me when tilting her head at certain words or a different pitch. What does what I am saying mean to her? Is it actually just the tone that she understands rather than language?
3. Main argument
Before beginning the main discussion in this essay, the difference between language and communication must be outlined. The Penguin English Dictionary (2003) defines language as ‘the ability to make and use audible, articulate, and meaningful sound by the a...
... middle of paper ...
...he caretaker] in just this way when she finally returned to work with the chimps. Kat made her apologies to Washoe, then decided to tell her the truth, signing "MY BABY DIED." Washoe stared at her, then looked down. She finally peered into Kat's eyes again and carefully signed "CRY", touching her cheek and drawing her finger down the path a tear would make on a human (Chimpanzees don't shed tears). Kat later remarked that one sign told her more about Washoe and her mental capabilities than all her longer, grammatically perfect sentences."
The studies of these chimpanzees show that there is a possibility of animal communication, though maybe not through phonetic systems, but signs.
8. Semiotics and sound systems
The use of sign language in apes brings me on to semiotics, which is the study of signs, sign processes and meaning making. C.S. Pierce and Charles Morris
Do non-human primates have communication, language, both, or neither? By definition, communication is the imparting or interchange of thoughts, opinions, or information (Snowdon). Communication is very closely related to social behavior since they are both referring to the ways animals interact with each other (Quiatt and Reynolds 1993). Conversely, language is defined as a system of communication using sounds or gestures that are put together in meaningful ways according to a set of rules (Haviland et al. 2010). Non-human primates and human primates are similar in many ways, and communication is no exception. They both have various types of communication senses and styles. Human primate communication senses consist of sight, smell, taste, hearing, and touch. Non-human primates mainly understand the world through sight, but smell, taste, and hearing are important as well (Quiatt and Reynolds 1993). Human primates are capable of speaking a language, while non-human primates use different vocal calls to communicate. In essence, the difference is simple, human primates have language while non-human primates do not. Even though non-human primates do not have language, they do have communication.
The debate about whether or not apes can learn human language has been going on for many years. There is an overwhelming amount of research on the subject to support both sides. It should be understood however, that learning and understanding human language is not the same as speaking the language. Apes are unable to physically speak human language for several reasons. As noted on the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics website, “Unlike humans, apes lack the anatomical pre-requisites for verbal language production. The organs within the vocal tract, such as larynx muscles and vocal cords, cannot be moved as freely and coordinated as in humans, especially not at a comparable speed” (Bangle, “Questions and Answers”). With that said, I believe the research I found strongly supports that apes do have the capacity for learning and understanding human language. There have been numerous studies conducted in which apes have been taught to communicate using sign language. In the 1960’s a female chimpanzee named Washoe was taught the American Sign Language. Washoe was raised by researchers Allen and Beatrix Gardner and is believed to be the first chimpanzee to learn aspects of human language. The Gardners established Project Washoe to teach the chimpanzee American Sign Language. The National Geographic News reported that “For Washoe to be considered "reliable"
Language is commonly held to be the province of humans, but other inhabitants of earth possess their own forms of communication. Birds, dolphins, and whales are some of those that have a language. Primates also use vocal communication with each other. Their utterances have varied uses and volumes, with each primate’s voice being distinct just as human voices are. These unique calls have given researchers insight into the social workings of primate groups. The very fact that primates have a language offers insight into the evolution of language and calls into question what the term human truly means.
Both animals and humans have different ways to communicate, but at the same time there are a few ways in which we communicate very similarly. Human language does not set humans apart from other species because almost all species can communicate, and some in ways very similar to us. Animals can communicate with hand motions, and sign language, and there are also cases like Alex the parrot who can talk and understand what he is saying just like us.
Chimpanzees and Bonobos are very similar species of apes and they both have very similar gestures that have alike meanings. While it is not surprising that some of the gestures are the same, it is more surprising that they also have the same intention. When comparing the gestures, the ASO, or Apparently Satisfactory Outcome, is taken into consideration. The ASO is used to help figure out the meaning of the gesture by showing how the receiver of the gesture responds to the action and if the signaller is satisfied with the outcome of their response. The gestures and meanings are then compared between bonobos and chimpanzees to determine how similar their actions are to each other.
The Gibbon monkey also demonstrates the arbitrariness design feature of human language. Arbitrariness is defined as having no intrinsic or logical connection between a sound signal and its meaning (Bauer, 2006, pp. 49-57). This is further demonstrated by the fact that different communication systems, human or not, attribute very different names to the same object. While the exact sounds of these monkey’s calls are not known from this article, it is however determined that their songs and or calls have no natural connection to the object that is being symbolized.
In 1977 Irene Pepperberg, a recent graduate of Harvard University, did something very bold. At a time when animals still were considered automatons, she set out to find what was on another creature’s mind by talking to it. She brought a one-year-old African gray parrot she named Alex into her lab to teach him to reproduce the sounds of the English language. “I thought if he learned to communicate, I could ask him questions about how he sees the world.”
Gorilla’s have always had their own body language. They beat their chests and use sounds and simple gestures to communicate in the wild. Maybe that is why Koko could learn sign language so easily.
"Chimpanzees give a range of different calls: hoots, pant-hoots, pant-grunts, pant-barks, rough-grunts, nest-grunts, alarm barks, waa-barks, wraas, screams, copulation screams, and soft panting play sounds (a.k.a. laughter)," Wilson said. "Many of these calls grade into one another, and it can be difficult to categorize particular examples of some calls."
The pair used various tests and procedures to see if chimpanzees were able to discriminate between humans who could and who couldn’t see them. The chimpanzees were placed in a scenario in which there would be a human facing them and a human with their back to the chimpanzee; the chimpanzees were more generally found to gesture towards the human facing it to grab their attention. Further tests found that chimpanzees didn’t act differently in further test conditions, even when the human’s vision was limited; for example, a bucket over the human’s head or their eyes being closed, whilst still facing the chimpanzee. (Povinelli and Eddy 1996) The pair concluded that chimpanzees showed little evidence in understanding visual concepts but showed that they can respond to ‘behavioural cues’ such as whether the human was facing towards or away from the chimpanzee in order to ‘select the human who is more likely to give them food’ (Hewson et al, 2016) but do not have ToM as they do not understand seeing as a mental state. More evidence suggests that chimpanzees understanding of mental states comes from the ‘food competition paradigm’ – ‘in chimpanzee’s natural environments, they are often in competition for food so it is suggested that the chimpanzees are showing a more natural behaviour
Project Nim is a documentary that focuses on attempts to teach Nim the chimpanzee language, specifically sign language. It follows the different environments Nim lived in—some conducive to the project’s goal, and others not. The film focuses on the relationship between Nim and his ‘teachers’ and caretakers, especially his interactions with them as he matured and started expressing more aggressive, chimp-like behavior, despite being raised similar to a human child in many aspects.
Creatures on earth use various ways to communicate. Animals frequently using sound as a signal consist with messages they want to send. Although the human language uses lots of arbitrary symbols, and human language is passed from generation to generation, there are several successful cases of training other animals to use human language. Whether or not animals are able to use human language is a controversial topic. In my opinion, an ape does use language, this essay will discuss five human language features(dual articulation, semanticity, productivity, learnability and feedback)and, find out how design features appear in several chimpanzee experiments, especially Allen and Beatrice 's experiment of teaching sign language to chimpanzee.
Whether it is in a social setting with acquaintances or a stimulus-bound reaction in the wild, there is no question that both animals and humans do communicate on a regular basis. Both humans and animals use communication as a means to express things to their fellow species. While animal communication is limited, human communication is vast, complex and ever changing. In order for us to be able to argue that animals are using language, the animal would not only have to be able to mimic the sounds of the language, but also be able to demonstrate an understanding for what the words mean. In this essay, I will explore why it is not possible for animals to learn human language.
Speaking is a natural ability given to most reluctant individuals. Since the beginning of time, it has been assumed that we have a right to speak and use words, thus we naturally begin our development of language during the early stages of live. After years of grasping and perfecting our vocabulary and language, it seems unnecessary to study the purpose of our development. Why, then, should we study “oral communication?” There are many purposes, benefits, and institutions that branch from oral communication. Of course, communication is the basis of interaction with other individuals through the use of expressions and words; however, through studying oral communication, one can take the words and expressions being used and apply them to his or her own life. After all, the most effective and useful knowledge is applied knowledge.
Communication can be described as the bestowing or trading of data by talking, composing, or utilizing some other medium (Oxford, 2017). Animals need to communicate for many reasons, such as exchanging their feelings, needs, and experiences. For instance, birds sing and dance to introduce themselves or to look for food. Furthermore, cats rub their fur with our clothes to leave their scents as an expression of ownership. Although animals communicate, they cannot talk like humans. The shape of the mouth and its components, such as lips and tongue are not similar to human. In addition, animals’ communication system does not show any of the four particular qualities that are frequently connected with language, which are discreteness, grammar, productivity,