More handpicked essays just for you.
A good man is hard to find literary analysis
Character Analysis in the story A good man is hard to find
A Good Man is Hard to Find literary Analysis Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A good man is hard to find literary analysis
Hulga initially thinks herself to be all-knowing and self-sufficient, denying God’s existence and believing in the nihilistic nothing. However, as the encounter with Manley Pointer progresses, she realizes he is not the good man she thought him to be, showing she does not truly see through everything as she once believed. After taking her leg, and by extension her trust, Pointer turns around to tell her, “Hulga,’ he said, using the name as if he didn’t think much of it, ‘you ain’t so smart. I been believing in nothing ever since I was born!” (430). The young man who once looked at Hulga like she had hung the stars in the sky has now revealed his true nature. Pointer gains her trust the moment she hands him her leg and independence, and shatters it to pieces, along with her beliefs that there is no such thing as good or bad. As he leaves, he says …show more content…
Hulga is a hypocrite. Though she looks down on others who believe in God and salvation, she believes in a concept she does not comprehend, hiding away her ideas on good and bad. She quotes Malebranche without realizing his words signified that one finds light in God. Pointer tells Hulga she is not as smart as she believes herself to be, and with that, he takes away a part of her she has always assumed a part of her identity. He tells her he has believed in nothing since he was born, shaming Hulga for believing she was superior to him because he was “good country people.” With violent words that cut apart her identity, Hulga has a moment of clarity lying on the barn attic floor. People who hide behind masks, whether they be a face of a nihilist or an errant Bible salesman, have no true knowledge or meaning in their life. Flannery O’Connor emphasizes that to be good, one must be honest and forthright in order to receive God’s kindness and
In the book Unbroken by Laura Hillenbrand, young Louie Zamperini is the troublemaker of Torrance, California. After his life had taken a mischievous turn, his older brother, Pete, managed to convert his love of running away, into a passion for running on the track. At first, Louie’s old habit of smoking gets the best of him, and it is very hard for him to compare to the other track athletes. After a few months of training, coached by Pete, Louie begins to break high school records, and became the fastest high school miler in 1934. After much more hard work, goes to the Olympic Games in Berlin in 1936 but is no match for the Finnish runners. He trains hard for the next Olympic Games, and hopes to beat the four minute
Hulga believes she has found the right guy. Hulga meets a Bible salesman named Manley Pointer who gives a vibe as good country man. Manly Pointer tells Hulga and her mother he’s from the country. Much like Hulga, Emily meets a northerner by the name of homer, who was a foreman. This is strange, because the Homer does not seem like the kind to take to Emily. With agreement to my statement Jim Barloon says “why did homer, a rowdy extrovert, take take up the spinsterly Emily.” Emily and Homer are seen around the town a lot as the narrator states, “we began seeing him and Miss Emily on Sunday afternoons driving in the yellow-wheeled buggy” (102). this shows that they have been a couple for the time
He has qualities of “good country people” by selling bibles and “not attending college but devotes his life to Christian service” (178). His appearance and name is a great symbol that signifies of something that is not real which connects to Hulga’s name. Manley’s name has an impact towards Hulga because his name signifies a manly figure which is a missing part in Hulga’s life. On the other hand his last name Pointer symbolizes great divulge of something amazing that will stand out in Hulga’s way. However his name is seen as a false and in reality symbolizes the emptiness of a male presence and the revelation that her life consists of only falsities. O’Conner also used a great mirror description between a bible and his name. Manly pulled out two bibles though one “was hollow and contained a pocket flask of whisky, a pack of cards and a small blue box with printing on it” (192). O’Conner used this hallow bible filled with several profane and contrary items as a symbolism to expose the meaning of Manley’s true self character. Manley is seen as a true nihilist, and through his name, hollow bible and false Christian morals he has revealed himself towards Hulga, as a true meaning of simply believing in nihilistic
Joy/Hulga has two items that are used alternately to describe her, the eyeglasses that counter her weak eyes and are a sign of her intellectuality, and the wooden leg that she wields through sound and appearance as a weapon against her mother’s solicitude. When Manley Pointer removes her glasses and steals her wooden leg, she is left totally weak and vulnerable. The Bible salesman himself uses the illusion of Bibles as a symbol. He has claimed to have a suitcase full of Bibles to sell, but his moral laxness is revealed when he opens the case to reveal two Bibles, one of which has a hidden
According to Ellen Douglas, the "evil in human hearts, and the possibility of grace, the gift of love, are made terrifyingly and magnificently real" when the grandmother, at gunpoint, admits that The Misfit really is, in her standards, a good man at heart (381). He is better able to express his beliefs about religion, but she has no firm foundation. When he says, "She would [have] been a good woman, if there had been somebody there to shoot her every minute of her life," he is revealing the fact that her pride, instead of her faith, has carried her through life (O'Connor, "A Good Man" 392). She has merely acted out the life of a typical Southern lady of he...
Some may think that Hildegard is treated, at times, too harshly for her visions. Hildegard finally decides to express her visionary gift, but unfortunately, she is not openly shown ecstatic emotions. She confides in her friend, Volmar, and is greeted with the proper expressions of excitement and enthusiasm. She is also greeted with these expressions from Abbot Kuno, although slow to show at first but eventually persuaded into enthusiastic reviews. However, when a council of monks inspects the products of her gift, she is met with skepticism and denial. These emotions are mainly brought up because of her gender. Many may believe this is reinforced with the lines: “You’re saying that you can understand, but we can’t?”; “To claim to hear secrets that prophets were denied? Outrageous!”; “Only the Holy Father can judge her case”; and “She will probably be expelled from the Church as a heretic!” Not only
God displays his protective powers in various ways. She is shown to be in despair numerous times. So many things happen that keep chipping away at her spirit. The Indians come and ransack the town, basically burning it to the ground. She is separated from all of her children except for one and even in that moment, her daughter dies in her arms after being wounded by a gunshot. Rowlandson herself is injured and is forced to keep travelling despite her conditions. Chaos seems to surround her at every angle. She is initially given a very miniscule amount of water to sustain her on the trip along with some nuts and crumbs. Rowlandson states that “… still the Lord still upheld me...” and also that “he hurt me one hand, and proceeded to heal me with the other”. She believes that due to her people being unfaithful, the Lord is now punishing them so that they can repent. But her being puritan and a chosen one, instead of being killed off, she is preserved and is allowed to get back in God’s good standing. At one point she even thinks of attempting suicide and ending all the misery but she states that thanks to God, she came back her senses and reason to know that she couldn’t go through with such an act. God was using the Indians as agents to punish the Puritans and in doing so, whenever the opportunity for freedom arrived and for some reason the opportunity was not seen
Chapter six of Blown to Bits by Hal Abelson, Ken Ledeen, and Harry Lewis focuses on the availability of bits via the internet and how easily they can be stolen. They discuss how companies attempt to combat this issue and potential issues that this can present. Throughout the chapter, the authors contemplate the effects that the internet has had on copyright infringement and legislation surrounding that. They discuss authorized use and rulings surrounding it. The overarching theme of the chapter seems to be that the internet was made to share information, however; in that process, information can be stolen easily, and that issue is not easy to combat.
Ooka Shohei named the last chapter of Fires on the Plain “In Praise of Transfiguration.” Through the whole novel, readers witness the protagonist Tamura transform from an innocent soldier to a killer. Readers watch him go from condemning the practice of eating human flesh to eating human flesh for his own survival. At the end, Readers see Tamura’s redemption as he shot Nagamatsu who killed and ate his own comrade Yasuda. What was the difference between two men who both killed and ate human beings? To Tamura, the guilt of eating human flesh distinguished himself from Nagamatsu who cold-bloodily killed Yasuda. As Tamura recalled, “I do not remember whether I shot him at that moment. But I do know that I did not eat his flesh; this I should certainly have remembered.” (224) The fact of him shooting at Nagamatsu had no importance to Tamura. However, his emphasis on not eating
...she has also lost the foundation of her identity, her leg. She is faced with the realization that she has been naïve all along. In her pattern of being quick to make assumptions to build her own self esteem, Joy-Hulga has not used her intelligence in a socially beneficial way.
Flannery O’Connor's perception of human nature is imprinted throughout her various works. This view is especially evident in the short stories, “A Good Man Is Hard to Find” and “Revelation.” She conveys a timeless message through the scope of two ignorant, southern, upper class women. In “A Good Man is Hard to Find,” O’Connor presents readers to a family who is going on a road trip with their selfish grandmother. She is a religious woman who does not follow the set standards that she preaches. Similar characteristics are exposed in “Revelation.” As the self centered Mrs. Turpin sits in the waiting room, she contemplates on her own status with God. Nevertheless, she still commits the sin of judging others. In both of O’Connor’s short stories, these controversial protagonists initially put up a facade in order to alienate themselves from their prospective societies. Although the grandmother and Mrs. Turpin both believe in God, O’Connor utilizes theme to expose that they also convince themselves that they can take on His role by placing judgement on people who, at the most fundamental level, are in the same category as them.
It is Thea’s ‘don’t care’ attitude and the way in which everything always turns out fine for her that really gets to Hedda. In the beginning, Thea arrives at the Tesman’s house and explains how she ran away from her husband in pursuit of Løvborg. When asked what she thinks others will say, her reply is quick and to the point: “God knows they’ll say what they please” (240). Thea has found true love with Løvborg. Hedda, being terrified of scandal herself, can not bare the fact that Thea does not care what others say. Løvborg used to be her love and now Thea has won him over and made him better--Thea was the one that helped him recover from alcoholism. This is one of the catalysts that leads Hedda to explode in her revenge and commit a terrible act: burning the manuscript that Løvborg and Thea had worked on. Consumed with the evil deed, she exclaims, “Now I’m burning your child, Thea! You, with your curly hair! Your child and Eilert Løvborg’s. Now I’m burning--I’m burning the child” (288). Once again, her jealousy of Thea’s hair resurfaces. Yet, that is not all of what easily comes to Thea. She does not even try, but manages to somehow win over George’s mind with saving the manuscript. Thea’s influence is invisible, yet very potent, causing George to say, without thinking, that he will give up his whole life to rewrite that script (297). Therefore, Thea is unknowingly taking away two people
Flannery O’Connor’s personal views on the justification of religion and the resulting world or corruption and depravity are apparent in her short story “A Good Man is Hard to Find”. She analyzes the basic plight of human existence and its conflict with religious conviction. The first two-thirds of the narrative set the stage for the grandmother, representing traditional Christian beliefs, to collide with The Misfit, representing modern scientific beliefs. The core of symbolism and the magnet for interpretation is at the end, the conversation between the grandmother and The Misfit. The conversation represents the examination of the clash between animal and metaphysical human nature and the Misfit is the literary depiction of the outcome of that clash.
...at the advice she offers these women is looked upon with contempt. She begins to adapt to her life after Sary Jones advises her to “make de bes’ of et” but her efforts falter during her next pregnancy (125). Instead of making the best of her life, Helga hands over this responsibility to God which eventually leads to the same feeling of “dissatisfaction [and] asphyxiation that she felt in Naxos, New York and Copenhagen” (134). After all of her experiences, her inability to conform leads her right back to the same place she started from. It is obvious that Helga Crane will never truly be able to “fit in” in any society.
In Flannery O 'Connor 's short story, A Good Man is Hard to Find, the theme of good vs. evil unravels throughout the series of tragic events. The Grandmother’s epiphany introduces the idea of morality and the validity is left to the interpretation of the reader. By questioning the characteristics of right and wrong, morality and religion become subjective to personal reality and the idea of what makes individuals character good or bad becomes less defined.