Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Meiji era, when Japan opened up
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Ooka Shohei named the last chapter of Fires on the Plain “In Praise of Transfiguration.” Through the whole novel, readers witness the protagonist Tamura transform from an innocent soldier to a killer. Readers watch him go from condemning the practice of eating human flesh to eating human flesh for his own survival. At the end, Readers see Tamura’s redemption as he shot Nagamatsu who killed and ate his own comrade Yasuda. What was the difference between two men who both killed and ate human beings? To Tamura, the guilt of eating human flesh distinguished himself from Nagamatsu who cold-bloodily killed Yasuda. As Tamura recalled, “I do not remember whether I shot him at that moment. But I do know that I did not eat his flesh; this I should certainly have remembered.” (224) The fact of him shooting at Nagamatsu had no importance to Tamura. However, his emphasis on not eating …show more content…
He vomited as Nagamatsu chopped off Yasuda’s wrists and ankles. He said “the most horrible thing of all was that I had expected these very actions!” As he predicted his own calamity in the early chapters, he foresaw the bloody conflict between Nagamatsu and Yasuda because of the long-existed deep distrust in them. But as he witnessed Nagamatsu dismembering Yasuda, he realized that human beings had no limit of becoming more vicious and cannibal. He was desperate at recognizing the reality, and he wanted to detach from the human species, as he said, “If I at this moment could vomit forth anger, then I, who was no longer human, must be an angel of God, an instrument of God’s wrath.” Tamura’s feeling of disgust at Nagamatsu’s cannibalism distinguished him from human beings who bared the ugliness of human nature. So he turned his exasperation into shooting at Nagamatsu as a punishment representing
In the book Unbroken by Laura Hillenbrand, young Louie Zamperini is the troublemaker of Torrance, California. After his life had taken a mischievous turn, his older brother, Pete, managed to convert his love of running away, into a passion for running on the track. At first, Louie’s old habit of smoking gets the best of him, and it is very hard for him to compare to the other track athletes. After a few months of training, coached by Pete, Louie begins to break high school records, and became the fastest high school miler in 1934. After much more hard work, goes to the Olympic Games in Berlin in 1936 but is no match for the Finnish runners. He trains hard for the next Olympic Games, and hopes to beat the four minute
...I have killed no one yet and God grant it may be so ordered I never may” . Consequently, the views expressed in chapter 3 lead me to position it as least convincing.
Though, the conclusion that White makes that is arguable is the fact that, “…we, the gentle reader, might similarly welcome Montresor back into the human community with our horror-stricken hearts” (White 555). This is debatable because even though humans want to defend their units, whether that be family or country, not everyone is exempted for the guilt that comes with murder. All in all, the act of taking the life from another human, still is rarely —if ever— justifiable, especially to the torturous extents that Montresor takes the action. So not everyone would forgive Montresor in this manner, this can bring valuable insight to us as a humanity, and how if we feel extensive discomfort over Montresor’s assassination of his rival, then perhaps we should feel the same way about the annihilation of our countries own
It was a special pleasure to see things eaten, to see things blackened and changed. (3) He didnt perceive it to be a bad and destructive thing. But in a larger sense, Montag did identify fire with warmth and spirit. By the end of the book Montag had gone through a tremendous change.
The first chapter in the book At The Dark End of the Street is titled “They’d Kill Me If I Told.” Rosa Park’s dad James McCauley was a expert stonemason and barrel-chested builder. Louisa McCauley was Rosa Park’s grandmother, she was homestead and her husband and oldest son built homes throughout Alabama’s Black Belt. In 1912 James McCauley went to go hear his brother-in-law preach. While there, he noticed a beautiful light named Leona Edwards. She was the daughter of Rose Percival and Sylvester Edwards. Sylvester was a mistreated slave who learned to hate white people. Leona and James McCauley got married a couple months after meeting and Rosa was conceived about nine months after the wedding. In 1915, James decided to move North with all
nbroken is a true story of Louis Zamperini during World War II in United States.
In the first steps of savagery, people will tend to want to kill something, but does not. When you first want to hunt or to kill something, a lot of people pause or stop and have a rush of society pass through their mind as they think about
One major theme discussed in the readings this week was that although the United States attempted to spread democracy to other nations, post -Cold War saw continued inequality both socially and economically within the United States’ borders and continued political and social unrest in foreign countries. This unrest in other countries, as discussed in the readings regarding the Rwandan Genocide, Srebrenica Massacre, and Borstelmann explain why the United States felt the need to get involved. Borstelmann also focuses on the continued political and social unrest with the Unites States, explaining that while America holistically celebrated becoming a more cultural diverse nation, many people within the United States’ borders were still victims
What happens when the United States takes over a country's governments? Overthrow by Stephen Kinzer tells the story of how the United States took over the governments of many unstable countries. The U.S interfered with the governments for the worse and caused the countries too lose total control. The most recent places that the United States took over were Grenada, Panama, Afghanistan and Iraq. The United States caused communities to unravel and people to go into total chaos. The United States thought that overthrowing these countries would lead to success and the citizens would be grateful for all that the U.S did, but quite the opposite occurred. The governments changed for the worse and the U.S had a very negative impact on the citizens
Stolen by Lucy Christopher initially takes place in the Bangkok airport, but the majority in the novel takes place in a remote desert in Australia. The main characters are, a 16 year old girl named Gemma Toombs, the protagonist, and 24 year old man, Ty, the antagonist, his real name being Tyler MacFarlane. The novel starts off with Gemma in Bangkok airport, waiting for her next flight. Ty is from Australia and takes her from the airport to Australia. They end up in the middle of the Great Sandy Desert in the Australian outback, where nobody can be found for hours. Tyler then brings her to a house he has built in the middle of that desert, making her stay there.
I still am, to tell the truth.’” (Fast 155) This statement justifies his actions. Morgan was terrified of the unusual creature thus causing its death. Human beings often only can react this way when faced with an unusual event. Human beings are scared and only can do so much. Instinctively when scared human beings will attack and take a defensive stand. “All three men were watching me, and suddenly I was on the defensive ‘I didn’t know! What do you expect when you see an insect that size?’” (Fast 155) This is something that is not taught, but developed as violence is a part of human life. Lieberman, one of the scientists, adds a very good point “’Can you imagine a mentality to which the concept of murder is impossible—or let me say absent. We see everything through our own subjectivity. Why shouldn’t some other --this creature, for example –see the process of mentation out of his subjectivity. So he approaches a creature of our world –and he is slain. Why?’” (Fast 157) Without the concept of murder, the functionality of life becomes deceased. Therefore life goes hand in hand with death. They work in conjunction to keep balance on earth. That creature could have murdered him as quickly as he murdered the creature, he wouldn’t have known that whether or not he had not killed it. Morgan’s actions are justified because he was scared of the
This idea is expressed prominently in John Foulcher’s For the Fire and Loch Ard Gorge. For the Fire entails a journey of someone collecting kindling as they witness a kookaburra kill a lizard, Foulcher represents his idea through the use of metaphor, “a kookaburra hacks with its axe-blade beak.” This metaphor represents the beak in weaponised form, as it is compared with a violent axe. This evokes a sense of threat and intimidation towards the kookaburra, which contrasts to societies general interpretation of the ‘laughing kookaburra,’ thereby challenging the reader's perceptions of beauty in the natural world. Also, this comparison of the kookaburra offers a second understanding for the readers to interpret of the kookaburra. Similarly, in Loch Ard Gorge, Foulcher uses strong visual imagery, “savage dark fish are tearing their prey apart, blood phrasing the water decked with light,” to communicate the violence of the ‘savage’ fish to readers in a visual, gruesome manner. Thereby evoking a feeling of disgust towards the situation, as a visual description of blood is shown and Foulcher uses provoking, gruesome adjectives to communicate the fish's brutality. Foulcher expresses these ideas to communicate the abilities of nature, and provide a necessary ‘reality check’ for the readers, to review the beauty they see nature and understand the barbarity at the heart of everything. Although ruthlessness and brutality that nature can show are unintentional and immoral, this harm is a large part of the cycle nature needs to survive and thrive, and these factors can counteract assumed beauty and
Every Man wants to be respected for if you are respected then people will not just mess with you ,since they know something will happen to them Okonkwo and Gatsby were well respected. And so although Okonkwo was still young ,he was already one of the greatest men of his time Age was respected among his people, but achievement was revered. As the elders said, if a child washed his hand he could eat with kings. Okonkwo had clearly washed his hands and so he ate with kings and elders (Chinua 5). The people of Umuofia had so much respect for Okonkwo that they let him eat with them that is huge ,normally children or younger people in there society didn’t eat with king’s and the elders of the tribe. By eaten with those elders it means that they didn’t view him as a child, they viewed him as a equal that could do all the things that they can. The leaders trusted Okonkwo so much they they gave him the duty to look after Ikemefuna who was a sacrifice to Umuofia so a war wouldn’t start (chinua 6). This task wouldn’t be just giving to anyone ,because it affects how other tribes and things will view Umuofia if they just let the boy go. Then the village will be viewed as weak and other people will feel they can get away with anything.
Okonkwo is “a man of action, a man of war” (7) and a member of high status in the Igbo village. He holds the prominent position of village clansman due to the fact that he had “shown incredible prowess in two intertribal wars” (5). Okonkwo’s hard work had made him a “wealthy farmer” (5) and a recognized individual amongst the nine villages of Umuofia and beyond. Okonkwo’s tragic flaw isn’t that he was afraid of work, but rather his fear of weakness and failure which stems from his father’s, Unoka, unproductive life and disgraceful death. “Perhaps down in his heart Okonkwo was not a cruel man. But his whole life was dominated by fear, the fear of failure and weakness….It was not external but lay deep within himself. It was the fear of himself, lest he should be found to resemble his father.” Okonkwo’s father was a lazy, carefree man whom had a reputation of being “poor and his wife and children had just barely enough to eat... they swore never to lend him any more money because he never paid back.” (5) Unoka had never taught Okonkwo what was right and wrong, and as a result Okonkwo had to interpret how to be a “good man”. Okonkwo’s self-interpretation leads him to conclude that a “good man” was someone who was the exact opposite of his father and therefore anything that his father did was weak and unnecessary.
In Fyodor Dostoevsky’s drama, Crime and Punishment Rodion Romanovich Raskonlnikov exclaims, “I didn’t kill a human being, but a principle!” (Dostoevsky, 409). This occurs in part III, chapter VI of the novel when he’s battling with the confession of his murder he committed. In the beginning, Raskonlnikov, the protagonist of the novel, was a former student, struggling to get his life in order. He contemplates on whether he wants to assassinate his old land lady, Alyona Ivanovna, because he believes she was the cause for his debt. He finally slaughters her, and ends up slaughtering her sister, too, when she walked in on the murder. Afterwards, the crime he committed began to carp at his conscious psychologically. In a key passage of Crime and Punishment on page 409 , Fydodor Dostoevsky uses major themes, irony, language, symbols, and foreshadowing to emphasize the psychological effects that Raskonlnikov is struggling with before he confesses his murder.