How Democratic Was The Roman Republic Essay

600 Words2 Pages

In 509 BC, a new idea took over Rome, giving birth to the Roman Republic coming to rule over the people. The Roman Republic was a powerful government lasting over 500 years, however after it fell, one question still remains unanswered. How democratic was the Roman Republic? It came into power because people were tired of the monarchy, and this allowed them some freedom. The Roman Republic was democratic to an extent because it had three branches of government, the people could vote, and the Assemblies could pass legislature.
Much like the US, the Roman Republic had three branches of government: the Consuls, the Senate, and the Assemblies. The Roman government had three elements, each of them possessing independent powers. The Consuls were the “supreme leaders” of the government, and they were the wealthy magistrates of Rome. The Senate proposed laws, just as the Senate in the US government does. Now the part left to the people, the Assemblies. The people could vote for who got into the Assemblies, where they had the final say in the making of a law. This clearly shows how similar the Roman Republic’s government is to the US’s, each of them elements having checks and balances and the people choosing who …show more content…

Voting plays a key role in making a government democratic. In the Roman Republic, the Assemblies were elected by the people, and every male citizen, had a vote. There was no formal exclusion of the poor, and freed slaves could also vote. This is significant because most male citizens could vote, however only 2% of Roman citizens actually voted, because the voting had to be done in Rome. These barriers definitely made voting much harder, and only the wealthier people outside of Rome could afford to travel. However the fact that they, the people, could in fact choose who got into office, make the Roman Republic democratic, but to an

Open Document