Horace Mann: The Father Of Public Education

572 Words2 Pages

The earliest memories of my childhood that I can recall vividly are of my mother teaching me elementary Vietnamese and multiplication tables. “Your handwriting is terrible. You must fix it,” she remarked, handing the cursive sheet back to me. “Why does that matter if the answer is right?” I retorted. She sighed, “It matters because I said so.” I remember hating those lessons with a passion, but even back then, their value was not lost on me. It is because of her teachings that I still retain some semblance of the language and a love for math. However, when I entered public school, things changed. The problem was not the change of instructor, but rather the way resources, from the books to the teachers, were financed. I later learned that schools varying by regional area were funded by the taxes of the people living in the vicinity. This meant that some rural schools could go years without updating their books by which their students learned, or upgrading the technology for which new, more efficient learning programs were created. Luckily, the public school that I attended was better off, reaping the benefits by adding a fine arts wing to the school. But other …show more content…

He once said, “Doing nothing for others is the undoing of ourselves.” Mann made education more available to those who lacked it and spent years advocating for tighter state education standards. Nearly 200 centuries later in the United States, public or private schools that are underfunded often find themselves losing their best teachers to better pay and benefits, and as a result, the education level of their students suffers. Paradoxically, even though there is state regulated funding for public schools in America, it is inequitable. This unequal finance means that variation per state is wide and students across the nation do not receive an equivalent

Open Document