Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
'Borderland of borderlands': its analysis and exploration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When I first signed up for this class, I incorrectly assumed that the term “borderlands” simply referred to a geographic location along the border of Texas and Mexico, and that we would be studying relations between those two cultures. Certainly, we as a class have studied that extensively. But, that is not the extent of borderlands. My understanding of borderlands was not altogether clear until near the end of the course. Through study and examination, I came to understand the concept of borderlands as “the relations between two groups of people whose cultures and ideas have converged who may have normally disagreed with each other.” This encompasses just about everyone we have talked about, and then some. This encompasses Father Boyle and Catholics in their relation to gangs in East Los Angeles. This encompasses the volatile relationship between the native traditions of Latin America and the Vatican. Additionally, this could also encompass the relationship between liberals and conservatives, Protestant or Catholic, or theists and atheists. Additionally, this encompasses the rocky and sometimes unpredictable relationship between the Methodist Church and the homosexual community, who has used narratives, counter narratives, and testimonies to fight for a voice in the United Methodist Church. This form of activism (or simply doing something) has resulted in a borderlands between both parties and a new understanding in the Methodist Church amongst some people concerning homosexuality.
For nearly the entirety of the existence of the Christian faith, many people have declared homosexual acts and relationships to be a sin, even an abomination. Verses such as Leviticus 18:22 (You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abo...
... middle of paper ...
...g. The only catch; the wedding was for his son. In 2007 Frank Schaefer performed his son’s wedding in Pennsylvania. One month before the statute of limitations had expired, a church member filed a complaint when they found out that Rev. Schaefer had performed the wedding. The parishioner, Jon Boger, says “"It's his son. He loves his son. In a way I felt bad for him," Boger said. "But he's also shown no remorse or repentance, nor has he apologized to anyone." (Rubinkam, AP). Because of the guilty verdict, Schaefer has been defrocked, meaning he can no longer be appointed as an elder to a Methodist church, nor can he perform communion, baptism, or weddings in the future.
Works Cited
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/methodist-bishops-offer-support-to-pastor-who-lost-credentials-over-sons-same-sex-wedding/2013/12/21/9acaf1e6-6a77-11e3-a0b9-249bbb34602c_story.html
In Borderlands, the realities of what happens by the border instill the true terror that people face every day. They are unable to escape and trapped in a tragic situation. After reading my three classmates’ papers, I was able to learn a lot more about this piece than I originally encountered just on my own. I was able to read this piece in a completely new light and expand on ideas that I did not even think of.
On May the eighth of this year, the Conference of United States Religious Leaders and Ministers was held in Chicago, Illinois. The conference is an annual event coordinated by church leaders who each send a representative to take part in the discussions. Father Gregory McAllister of the Diocese of Arlington traveled to Chicago to attend the conference and share his knowledge. He spoke on behalf of the Catholic Church, while ministers and clergy from various religions from across the country also shared their views on the topics discussed.
Martinez, Oscar. Border People: Life and Society in the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands. (Tucson: The University of Arizona Press, 1994), 232.
Martinez, Oscar J. U.S.-Mexico Borderlands: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1996 (pp. 139-141).
Fag. Poof. Fairy. Homo. Dyke. Those are all words that are used on a daily basis to put down those who do not fit into the Bible’s supposed cookie-cutter, straight sexual orientation label. Homophobia has been around since the eleven hundreds, but before then homosexuality was viewed as healthy, normal, and at times it was even worshipped. However, society’s view of homosexuality has somehow been warped into a violently negative opinion. How did this happen? The main perpetrators of homophobia are the Bible and those who preach its word, or at least their version of its word. Which brings up the translation issues scattered throughout the Bible. The New Testament was written in Greek and there are not always direct translations of each word in English. The messages in the Bible that are said to condemn homosexuality can be interpreted in a more accepting way than they are usually preached.
The present-day world has changed greatly since the birth of Christianity. Through two millennia there has been social and spiritual changes in nearly every society. We have seen an abolishment of slavery in most of the world, women’s rights, animal rights, the rise and fall of numerous totalitarian government, and more recently an increased acceptance of gay men and women in nearly all walks of life. One thing that has not been accepted on such a great scale is the fact that homosexuality can occur in all walks of life, including that of the clergy. As written by Amanda Ripley in “Inside the Church’s Closet,” the percentage of gay priest may range from 15% to as much as 50%. In her interview with Franciscan priest, Jay Pinkerton, he explains, “I knew I didn’t want to get married, and I loved the church. I had thought about it since I was a kid, and it felt like a safe place. I wouldn’t have to worry about my sexuality. Nobody would expect that I would date.” Pinkerton goes on the say that as many as three-hundred of the four-hundred priests in his parish were gay.
In the debate over homosexuality, Christian ethicists have many authorities to draw from. From the mixture of biblical sources, traditional authorities, empirical and descriptive accounts, and cultural norms, Cahill chooses general biblical themes and modern culture as the primary authorities for her ethic. This departure from traditional Roman Catholic teaching implies some flaw in the connection between the Holy Spirit, the church, and common believers. Cahill’s decision is her method of fixing this disconnect and reuniting Christ’s message with all believers.
There are many issues that interfere with the health and happiness of those within the Gay and Lesbian community. The National Association Position Statement on Gays and Lesbians is as attempt to abolish such issues within the social work practice. One place that individuals of any sexual orientation practice should feel safe is with those who have chosen the field of social work as a means to helping the oppressed. Social workers must be aware of their own personal beliefs and values when it comes to the fear of and the misrepresentation of working with this divers group. The consequences of not dealing with such issues and may have a latent manifest in dealing with the Gay and Lesbian population, and if not addressed prior to working in this field, maybe devastating to a client.
"[I]t seems appropriate to understand sexual orientation (heterosexual or homosexual) as a deep-seated dimension of one's personality and to recognize its relative stability in a person. Generally, homosexual orientation is experienced as a given, not as something freely chosen. By itself, therefore, a homosexual orientation cannot be considered sinful, for morality presumes the freedom to choose. The teachings of the Church make it clear that the fundamental human rights of homosexual persons must be defended and that all of us must strive to eliminate any forms of injustice, oppression, or violence against them"(Pastoral).
Homosexuality is unnatural. Romans 1:27 mentions man “leaving the natural” (one man and one woman) and therefore taking part in acts of immorality. When the world was created, God made a man and a woman. He later tells them that part of their job is to replenish the earth. A common argument to this statement is the question, “what if they were born that way?” This question is easily answered. When a baby is born, he is either a boy or she is a girl. There are no if’s, but’s or maybe’s. The homosexual lifestyle is a choice. Also, there is no scientific proof that shows how an individual might be born as a homosexual. There is, however, proof that homosexuality can be dangerous and even deadly. From depression to breast cancer to AIDS, the homosexual lifestyle brings sickness and suffering to the individual. Although roughly 3.3% of Americans are homosexual, over 50% of this small group is accountable for HIV infection. Homosexuality is harmful not only mentally, emotionally, and spiritually, but it is also the cause of much disease and
We have all at some point or another heard someone say that God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. This saying is an excellent example of how a large number of Christian fundamentalist feel about the homosexual community. Studies have shown that there are more Christian homophobes than there is homophobia in any other group or religion in the United States (Wolff, J. R., Himes, H. L., Kwon, E., & Bollinger, R. A., 2012). Homophobia is the irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals. In Christianity, homophobia represents misunderstanding and fear of the unknown.
Since the 1800's, psychiatrists and psychologists have concluded that homosexuality is a mental disorder. They have believed it is brought about by misguided upbringing and their social environments. For instance, it was believed that if the child was lacking a male - figure in the home, he would most likely be gay. Or that child abuse can lead to lesbianism when the special needs of a little girl are denied, ignored, or exploited and the future womanhood of the child is in risk. However, inconsistencies in the research subjects' abuse records ruled these theories out. And if this were the case, then why is homosexuality present in different cultures? Some believed homosexuality was caused by a difference in brain structure. In 1991, Simon LeVay published research stating that sexual orientation may be the result of differing brain structures. The hypothalamus, a region in the brain that governs sexual behavior, was the structure that LeVay was pointing as the structure at fault. In his studies of the hypothalamus, he found that in homosexual men, the hypothalamus was smaller than that of heterosexual men. Instead, it was the size of the female hypothalamus, consequently explaining their sexual tendencies.
---If we were supposed to be homosexual, God would have created Adam and Steve, not Adam and Eve.
Homosexuality in Today's Society. In today's society, there exists a mixture of issues which tend to raise arguments with people all over. There are a handful of topics that always seem to escalate these differences between people to the point where one who earnestly participates in discussion, debate and argument can direct their anger towards their feelings on the person themselves. Some examples of such delicate subjects are the death penalty, abortion, and euthanasia.
Society today has become more accepting of homosexuality. There are single gender couples in the media, and gay rights, such as marriage, have become a political standpoint. In this class we have discussed how society today is changing, and how important it is to be accepting of others who are different. In a heterosexual society, it is a big deal that we are becoming more accepting of people who like the same sex. The problem is, some people aren't just heterosexual or homosexual. Similar to the gender binary, there is a sexual orientation binary being created by the media. The black and white view is damaging to people who like both genders. Society tries to put labels on people, causing people to question their own identity. In the time of adolescence this can be very damaging to someone, male or female. Education about bisexuality could be the step society needs to take to create a more accepting society. Right now, a bisexual is seen as someone who cannot make a choice, but society should not pressure people to choose. People should not have to label themselves heterosexual or homosexual. The media has become more accepting of same sex couples, however, it exploits bisexuality.