Henry And Aristol's Qualities

769 Words2 Pages

Courage is defined as a “mental or moral strength to venture, persevere, and withstand danger, fear, or difficulty”, according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary. Being an essential virtue, it is necessary for all leaders and distinguished men to possess. In Shakespeare’s Henry V, Henry is portrayed as a flaunting but determined leader who will do anything to secure his win. However, Pistol is shown to be lethargic and generally uninspired when the time for war arrives. After reading the definition of courage in the eyes of Aristotle, a greatly revered philosopher who lived during the mid to late 300s BC, both Henry and Pistol’s qualities are reaffirmed from a wiser standpoint. According to Aristotle, courage is “the virtue which …show more content…

Moreover, in Act 2, Scene 2, King Henry is once again showing his tenacious nature by deceiving the three traitors in a council-chamber in Southampton. By creating a ruse, in this case being a fabricated crime committed by a fabricated person, the King is able to get the criminals to essentially sentence themselves to death, in a grand display of trickery. Once again, Henry is seen doing everything in his power to ensure that at the end of the day, justice prevails. On the opposing side sits Ancient Pistol, who is indeed not …show more content…

King Henry has proven himself to be an extremely courageous man, whether he is intimidating the French, sentencing his subjects, or hyping his men up for war. Examined in Aristotle's definition of the virtue, the King is very well suited for his title. Ancient Pistol is the foil of King Henry, who is not courageous in the least, and who merely brags about being better than he is, without the actions to back it up. Aristotle's view on courage does not hold true to Pistol, as he is a pitiful excuse for an English

Open Document