Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
henry viii's life and impact
leadership and henry V
henry viii's life and impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: henry viii's life and impact
When deciding the qualities that make kings great, one thinks of a king who cares about his people. A king that is charming but humble; strong and determined; powerful and wise. Those characteristics are those of one English king, Henry V. He was king of England from 1413 to 1422, and he died at the age of thirty-five because of Dysentery. Nonetheless, Henry V was the greatest king of the European monarchies because he was fair and successful. Even though being known as a religious persecutor, Henry V was the best king in all of European history because he was a soldier king, he was very successful during his rule, and he had a strong leadership. One of the various things that made King Henry V a great king was that he was a soldier king and was not afraid to fight for his kingdom. One example of this was the Battle of Agincourt. This war started on October 25, 1415 and lasted one day. To rescue England’s reputation along with his own lost during the Hundred Year War, Henry rides off alongside twelve thousand English soldiers to France. Things start to go wrong after arriving at France for this beloved king. First, half of the King’s men die of dysentery before they arrive anywhere close to Agincourt and so the wise king decided that he and his men had to retreat. Sadly, the brave English were ambushed by French forces and the English were greatly outnumbered, but the soldier king, Henry V, was intelligent. As French forces attacked, the English bombarded them with arrows. By the end of the day, six thousand French deaths greatly outnumbered the four hundred deaths that of the English (“Henry V,” History.com). “After the English soldiers took too many French captives, Henry broke the law and ordered their execution to all without... ... middle of paper ... ... or worse is up for debate. Now, Henry V had completely changed England’s and Europe’s history. If this man wasn’t important, why did William Shakespeare write several plays based around his life? Why would we still remember him today if he wasn’t influential? King Henry V sets the ideal of what people think of when thinking of kings in the modern day society. That is the reason why Henry V was important and meaningful and worth learning about. Works Cited "King Henry V." 2014. Britannica Staff. Mar 24 2014. Web "Battle of Agincourt." 2014. The History Channel Website. Mar 23 2014, 5:59. Web "Henry V." 2009. History.com Staff. Mar 23 2014. Web. "Henry VI." 2014. Britannica Staff. Mar 24 2014. Web. "Henry V. King of England." 2014. Luminarium: Encyclopedia Project. Mar 23 2014. Web. "King Henry V (1413-1422)." 2014. Royals Family History Staff. Mar 24 2014. Web
Henry is the mirror of all Christian kings. He is a great king. He is
Henry was a very well driven person. He used very persuasive techniques in his writings and speeches. He was a leader, he lead the state of Virginia through the first part of the war. He was a very outspoken man and he always put others before him.
When Henry took the throne, he gave most of the responsibility to Cardinal Thomas Wolsey. He did this because as a 17 year old boy, he felt he wasn’t ready for all of that responsibility at once (Sommerville). Even though he was king, he had no desire to know the everyday problems of England. One of Henry’s biggest accomplishments as king was implementing a naval fleet. He tried to get England to fight with Scotland and France (Scarisbrick 738).
...tect his right to the throne. Ultimately, he stabilized the nation by settling the civil wars, the Wars of Roses, by marrying the apposing York family, to unite the two feuding families, the Yorks and the Lancasters. All together, King Henry VII is a new monarch for displaying all of the required traits.
honorble ruler. Henry IV was king of France between 1589 and 1610. He was supported
In the historical play Henry V by William Shakespeare, we are introduced to the story of a young and influential King Henry V of England, and his quest to conquer France under the ruler ship of Charles VI of France. This play details Henry’s life leading up to and following the Battle of Agincourt in the year 1415, which according to the “Hundred Years’ War”, was fought between England and France from 1337 to 1453. Now, in the source “William Shakespeare Biography”, it was found that Shakespeare lived from “c. 1564-1616” and is “widely considered the greatest dramatist of all time.” He too is of English descent, which suggests the bias that is present in this play, as according to “Henry V List of Characters”, Shakespeare’s primary purpose
Henry II, King of England, ruled strong and intelligently during his reign, making England one of the strongest countries at the time. Three important things occurred during his reign. The first one is the relationship between Henry and Thomas Becket. The second thing is the achievements he had done to help England become a strong and powerful country. The third important thing in his reign is how he altered the financial system, to take power away from the barons, and using taxes to help him build a fighting force, to keep England from being invaded.
In Henry V, the actions of King Henry portray him as an appalling leader. Among Henry's many negative traits, he allows himself to be influenced by people who have anterior motives. This is problematic because the decisions might not be the best decisions for the country, or neighboring countries. The bishops convinced Henry to take over France because they would be able to save land for the Church. Henry doesn't have the ability to accept responsibility for his actions, placing the blame on others. Before Henry begins to take over a French village, he tells the governor to surrender or risk having English troops terrorize civilians. This way, if the governor declines, it would be the governor's fault for the atrocities that would occur. Henry has gotten his troops to go along with the take over by manipulating them. He tells the soldiers that what they're doing is noble, and that they should be proud. In fact, they're attacking another country in order to conquer it. Henry's character comes off as coldhearted and careless. Henry shows ruthlessness towards civilians, threatening them with atrocities. He's careless with his soldiers, thoughtlessly allowing their executions, or playing hurtful games with them.
King Henry VIII was one of the most powerful rulers in the fifteenth century, who had a very captivating life many people are not aware of. Most people know Henry VIII as a berserk king with too many wives, but there is more to Henry VIII than that. Many few people know about his life and what he truly contributed to our world. Henry VIII was an almighty leader in England who won’t soon be forgotten.
For hundreds of years, those who have read Henry V, or have seen the play performed, have admired Henry V's skills and decisions as a leader. Some assert that Henry V should be glorified and seen as an "ideal Christian king". Rejecting that idea completely, I would like to argue that Henry V should not be seen as the "ideal Christian king", but rather as a classic example of a Machiavellian ruler. If looking at the play superficially, Henry V may seem to be a religious, moral, and merciful ruler; however it was Niccolo Machiavelli himself that stated in his book, The Prince, that a ruler must "appear all mercy, all faith, all honesty, all humanity, [and] all religion" in order to keep control over his subjects (70). In the second act of the play, Henry V very convincingly acts as if he has no clue as to what the conspirators are planning behind his back, only to seconds later reveal he knew about their treacherous plans all along. If he can act as though he knows nothing of the conspirators' plans, what is to say that he acting elsewhere in the play, and only appearing to be a certain way? By delving deeper into the characteristics and behaviors of Henry V, I hope to reveal him to be a true Machiavellian ruler, rather than an "ideal king".
For the simple fact that when Henry VI was younger and not allowed to take an active role in leading England, he did not really care about running the country. Henry was such a spiritually deep man that he lacked the worldly wisdom necessary to allow him to rule effectively (Wikipedia). Henry was more of an indecisive pushover.
In conclusion, Yes Henry is the Ideal of a Christian king. He had mercy, faith, and wisdom. He let God guide him to victory without any doubt or hesitation. That’s what being a Christian is all about putting your trust and faith in God when all seems as though things are failing but in your heart you believe that God will help and be there with you every step of the
Henry V is not a simple one as it has many aspects. By looking into
Henry IV is a play that concerns itself with political power and kingship in English history. References to kingship are prevalent throughout the play, especially in the depiction of the characters. Although most of the characters in this play could teach us about kingship, I would like to focus my attention to Prince Henry. I think that this character helps us to best understand what kingship meant at this particular time in history.
In conclusion, Henry VIII life was marked with tragedy and achievements. The overall reign of the Tudor Dynasty is the same. There were three children of Henry that took the throne: Edward, who improved some of the protestant problems, but was largely unsuccessful; "Bloody Mary" who murdered, destroyed, and angered the populace of England; and finally Elizabeth took the throne. It's ironic but Henry's least expected heir was actually the best. Princess Elizabeth saved the country with her intelligence, wisdom, and ingenuity, brought England to become a world power. To the best state the country had been in for years. Henry would have been proud of Elizabeth the Virgin Queen. Too bad the fate of not having an heir to the throne repeated and the dynasty was given over to the Spanish.