Hannah Arendt Refugees

1059 Words3 Pages

In We Refugees, Hannah Arendt primarily talks about the real struggle of the refugees, based on a bunch of historical evidences. Arendt starts the whole article with the refugees’ unwillingness of being refugees--what they want is be ordinary people in the new country. But their special identity and previous experience, it’s extremely hard for them to achieve the normality that they've been seeking. According to the article, “We started our new lives and tired to follow as closely as possible all the good advise our saviors passed on to us. We were told to forget; and we forgot quicker than anybody could imagine… the new country would become a new home.” Nonetheless, albeit the refugees’ willingness to forget their language, culture, their …show more content…

Based on the long dark history of persecution of Jewish people, I totally understand the author’s pain and her willingness to forget her culture and identity, but I just want to point out that even if it’s possible for Jews really get rid of their current identity, they might still have a multitude of new problems to …show more content…

At the right beginning of the essay, she questions that “How can I tell right from wrong, if the majority of my whole environment has prejudged the issue? Who am I to judge? ” and “To what extent, if at all, can we judge past events or occurrences at which we were not present?” Throughout the essay, Arendt keeps examining the relationship among human being’s morality, responsibility, and ability to make judgment that is purely personal. “Unfortunately, it seems to be much easier to condition human behavior and to make people conduct themselves in the most unexpected and outrageous manner, than it is to persuade anybody to learn from experience,.... that is, to start thinking and judging instead of applying categories and formulas which are deeply ingrained in our mind.... whose plausibility resides in their intellectual consistency rather than in their adequacy to actual events. “ Under dictatorship or within today’s political atmosphere, more often than not, people tend to effortlessly say “Yes”, rather than say “No”; because people make judgment based on “preconceived standards, norms and general rules’, in additional to moral consequences that they have witnessed or been told. The judgment by no means can be called

Open Document