Gun For Self Defense

386 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: 2nd Amendment & gun ownership

The case is about the first incident where they are determining the first amendment give people the right to guns for self defense. In the case there are many quotes that support the case that they are allowed for self defense. So therefor the second amendment allows you to own a gun for self defence. Why would you make an amendment for people to own guns in case of a war coming to their back yard but not for self defense? In the case many points were made about being able to have a gun for self defense. There is a quote that state all guns made during the creation of the first amendment and all guns that were made after it still are under it and protected by it. The quote states “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments

Show More
Related

  • A Well Regulated Militia by Saul Cornell

    1491 Words  | 3 Pages

    United States is a country that has problems with gun control, and this issue has many debates between whether or not people should be allowed to carry a gun on them. This free county not only for speech and religion, but also allows people to have the right to bear arms. The Second Amendment of the United States was written by our Founding Fathers,“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Government). The main purpose of the Second Amendment when our Founding Fathers wrote this amendment was to help the American citizens to defend themselves from the government at that time, and other countries from invading their properties. However, the Second Amendment could be the opposite of what our Founding Fathers wanted it to be in the twenty-first century, because many criminals are taking advantage of the right to carry guns, which in example results with the purpose of showing off with their friends, revenge for their gang’s members, or try to be like their favorite hero in the movie they had watched. On July 20, 2012, a massive shooting occurred inside of a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado. The tragedy happened during a midnight screening of the film The Dark Knight Rises which killed twelve people and injuring seventy others. In response, this alarmed our government to rethink about the current gun control law in America. In A Well Regulated Militia by Saul Cornell, the author informed to his audience the different views of gun ownership in early America, which part was the most important part of the debate, how did slavery affect the debate over militias in the South, the Continental army officer’s views, and the arguments be...

    Read More

  • Why Gun Laws Should Be Regulated

    1112 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ry weapons when in actuality it is only allowing members of the military to have weapons. This way of seeing the 2nd amendment was upheld in the Supreme Court in 1939 when the courts ruled that the 2nd amendment only guarantees the right to bear arms in the context of a state’s ability to form a militia.

    Read More

  • Milestones in Federal Gun Control Legislation

    1579 Words  | 4 Pages

    The debate at hand is due to an apparent opposition to the rights granted by the second amendment to the United States Constitution. This amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Being as the article was ratified in 1791, the language used is far different than that which is commonly used today. For this reason, the amendment itself is a source of debate between those with liberal and conservative points of view. For those who take a libe...

    Read More

  • Gun Ownership and the Second Amendment of the Constitution

    1611 Words  | 4 Pages

    Over the centuries, the Supreme Court has always ruled that the 2nd Amendment protects the states' militia's rights to bear arms, and that this protection does not extend to individuals. In fact, legal scholars consider the issue "settled law." For this reason, the gun lobby does not fight for its perceived constitutional right to keep and bear arms before the Supreme Court, but in Congress. Interestingly, even interpreting an individual right in the 2nd Amendment presents the gun lobby with some thorny problems, like the right to keep and bear nuclear weapons.

    Read More

  • Why Is The Second Amendment Important

    778 Words  | 2 Pages

    Heller,” the United States Supreme Court revealed what the Second Amendment is really about. In June 2008, a S.W.A.T. officer with the Washington, D.C., Police Department sued in the District of Columbia District Court for the right to carry a handgun while off duty. The Supreme Court ruled that he had the right to carry a weapon for a lawful purpose, and the District Court's opinion was reversed from the decision in 1939 when the Second Amendment was last interpreted. It also ruled that two District of Columbia laws, one that banned handguns and the other one that required firearms kept in the home to be disassembled or trigger-locked, violated the Second Amendment

    Read More

  • Prefatory Clauses Of The Second Amendment

    1057 Words  | 3 Pages

    The second amendment is made up of two clauses, the prefatory clause and the Operative Clause. The Prefatory clause states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State...?” The Operative Clause states, “...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” There is often many discord between whether the second amendment is talking about two separate groups, the militia or the people. The prefatory clause in my opinion announces the purpose for which the right was created, but doesn't suggest the main reason that the right to bear arms is valued. According to Justice Stevens, the prefatory clause stated that the purpose was to protect the state’s interest in maintaining an armed militia to

    Read More

  • The Controversy of the Second Amendment of the Constitution

    997 Words  | 2 Pages

    The way that an individual interprets the wording of the Second Amendment influences their point of view on who has the right to "keep and bear arms" (Amendment 2). The controversy brought on by the Second Amendment is because the Second Amendment does not clearly define whom "the people" are. This ambiguity has left room for action by legislative bodies and the courts to pass laws and make interpretations that influence the way this Amendment is applied and enforced. The Second Amendment says, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." (Amendment 2).

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: American Have the Right To Bear Arms

    1502 Words  | 4 Pages

    From this amendment it is apparent that the founders of our country knew in 1791 that guns did and would continue to play a role in the lives of Americans. Things haven't really changed that much.

    Read More

  • Guns are Destroying America

    865 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many people believe that owning any type of guns is a guaranteed right under the Second Amendment; this is not necessarily true. The Second Amendment of the U.S Constitution states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This Amendment therefore grants people the right to own a gun. The Amendment does no...

    Read More

  • District of Columbia v. Heller: The Use and Permit of Handguns

    1536 Words  | 4 Pages

    The District of Columbia v. Heller plays an important role in shaping our right to keep and bear arms for self-defense by being the first court case that defines who can own guns for self-defend. The whole case is revolving around the Second Amendment and its meaning. Since the Second Amendment first enact into law in 1791, this prompts the court to look at it again. By understanding its original meaning, the court then can understand what intended to do and how it affects our current time. Before the Heller court case, States in America have its own laws on who can own and use guns. While some State is lax in their law...

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment

    1716 Words  | 4 Pages

    As violence and murder rates escalate in America so does the issue of gun control. The consequence of this tragedy births volatile political discourse about gun control and the Second Amendment. The crux of the question is what the founding fathers meant when they wrote, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Since the writing of the Second Amendment the make and model of firearms has changed dramatically and so has the philosophies of the people. A rifle is no longer defined as a single shot, muzzle-loading musket used to primarily protect families or solely for food. Should the weapons we use today be protected by an amendment written nearly 222 years ago? Should the second amendment be rewritten? Does the Second Amendment apply to individual citizens? These questions spark extensive debates in Washington D.C. regarding what the founding fathers intended the amendment to be. The answer to this question lies in the fact that despite hundreds of gun control articles having been written , still the gun control issue remains unresolved. History tells us gun control debates will be in a stalemate until our judicial system defines or rewrites the Second Amend. This paper will examine the history of the Second Amendment, and attempt to define the framers intent, gun control legislation and look at factors that affect Americans on this specific issue...

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Should Handgun Ownership Be Banned

    358 Words  | 1 Pages

    The second amendment says, "A well regulated militia being necessary to security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." The second amendment was made for two things. It is there for first, to guarantee the individuals right to have arms for self-defense and self-preservation. The second reason is related to the militia. The right to carry a handgun for self-protection is a privilege of citizenship. The confusion is the right of the state or the individual. The regulation of handguns could be looked at as unconstitutional. The amendment is for the people and not the state.

    Read More

  • The Right to Bear Arms

    1317 Words  | 3 Pages

    The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in the Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation or individuals.

    Read More

  • Gun Control Does NOT Reduce Crime

    2312 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Second Amendment of the United States protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791 along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. The United States Government should not infringe on those rights by the enforcement of gun control against law-abiding citizens. Gun control does not reduce crime, does not stop criminals from obtaining guns, and does not address the real issue of violent crime. There is no evidence that gun control affects the crime rate.

    Read More

  • Should You Be Able to Carry a Concealed Handgun?

    718 Words  | 2 Pages

    Did you know the second amendment states that you have a right to own and use arms for protection? Kentucky passed a law in 1813 that prohibits the carrying of concealed weapons. In May 1987, Florida passed a “shall-issue” law that became a model for other states. There were 11 states that have the “may-issue” law which allowed permits. On July 8, 2011, Wisconsin became the 49th state to allow concealed carry. (ProCon.org) Adults who go through training and obtain a permit should be able to carry a concealed handgun.

    Read More

More about Gun For Self Defense

Open Document