Good And Evil In Schindler's List

781 Words2 Pages

Good and evil can be summed up as a difference between rational and irrational thoughts, with the former being related to “good” and the ladder to “evil”. This is a view shared by Immanuel Kant and his Categorical Imperative. In the movie Schindler’s List, we are presented with two individuals, Oskar Schindler, who by the end of the movie displays characteristics of a man following rational thoughts, doing acts that he would want to become universal maxims. On the other end of the spectrum, we have Amon Goeth. Goeth follows his irrational thoughts, using the Jewish people as a means for his own ends.
Oskar, in the beginning of the film, was much like Amon, using the plight of the Jews for his own personal gain. He hires Jewish labor and uses Jewish money to start up a business. As he told his wife, the only thing he had been missing on all his business ventures was war. Though there isn’t any dialogue to give us any direct clues, the scene in which Schindler witnesses the liquidation of the ghetto at Krakow hints at the changes that start to overtake him. He appears to be absorbed by the blunt realization of what the Nazis are really doing. He watches from a hill overlooking the ghetto, as Jews are slaughtered and children are ignorant to what is happening. The horror of it all is too much for his mistress to handle, and she begs him to leave the terrible scene.
When a Jewish girl living in Krakow under fabricated papers visits Schindler, and she asks that he hire her parents to work in his factory. He is furious with the girl and she runs from him, fearing for her life and her liberty. Schindler expresses his rage at Stern, whom he accuses of giving refuge to Jews in the "haven" of a factory. Schindler is not angry at the idea ...

... middle of paper ...

...t it should become a universal law." In order to understand what this means, we have to discern what Kant means by maxims. Kant believed that people did certain things for particular motives, and when they did these things they were adhering to a maxim. With that in mind, we can understand the Categorical Imperative to mean that we should only act a definite way in a situation if that action would be suitable every time that situation came about. Kant later restated his Categorical Imperative to say that we should act so as to treat humanity, whether in our own person or in that of another, constantly as an end, and never as a means to an end. In other words, we should not merely exploit people in order to achieve our own goals. We should not treat them merely as objects, or tools, to be used in our own doings. To this end, Schindler's plea for mercy seems sensible.

Open Document