Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Describe Jan van Eyck’s painting technique and style
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Describe Jan van Eyck’s painting technique and style
Compare and contrast (Eassy number 3)
Jan van Eyck painted Giovanni Arnolfini and His Bride. He painted this piece with oil on wood in 1434. The painting was thought to be of a couple taking vows because they are holding hands. The couples clothing provides the audience with the suggestion that the couple is wealthy. The women is wearing a plain necklace. The woman shows an apparent bulge. This bulge could be from a pregnancy or the woman is just holding up her full-skirted dress in the contemporary fashon. The more clothing a person wore the richer they were. In addition, the house suggest that the couple is wealthy. There is a chandelier and room decorations. There is two candles in the chandelier. One is lit while the other is burnt out.
The double Portrait ( Happy Birthday, Dear Eshter) was created by Abraham Rattner in1974. It’s an oil paint on Masonite and the size of artwork is 29.5 x 28 in. This painting has two figures who are Rattner’s second wife, Eshter and Rattner himself. The scene is Rattner is painting the portrait of Eshter and Rattner, himself is half of the paining. Rattner is stadning foreground. He is holding paint pallet by left hand and he is facing sideway. Eshter is painted in the painting frame, thus she is a kind of slightly background position. This was a part of her birthday gift from Rattner. The year painted for this double portrait was their 25th wedding anniversary after they married in 1949 and he was 81 years old. He painted on Masonite which is made from a mixture of wood fibers that have been broken down and molded into a board using heat, pressure and the natural adhesion
...t. Instead of using symbolism, which is a major part of The Arnolfini Portrait, Velasquez strove to create a more snapshot-like painting, focusing more on capturing the natural allure of the royal family and the royal palace. Both artists were trying to capture and portray the personalities and lifestyles of a family, but each did it in their own way.
The two painters Jan Van Eyck (c.1390-1441) and Hans Memlinc (d.1494) are both considered great masters of Northern Art. Van Eyck is known for his execution of naturalistic detail and creating translucency in his panels. Memlinc is known for his financially minded cornucopia of work and for revolutionising the genre of portraiture. However, their differences are more pointed than there similarities. Both artists are mindful of the traditions of the Flemish school, such a the use of light to create a sense of the third dimension on the panel and the importance of landscape and background. Both artists worked in Bruges at some point; Van Eyck was an earlier master who moved to Bruges in 1430 until his death. Memlinc was German but settled there in 1465 until his death. The paintings by Van Eyck that shall be discussed are The Ghent Altarpiece, Madonna with Chancellor Rolin, Portrait of a Man and The Portrait of Giovanni Arnolfini and his Wife. The paintings by Memlinc that will be discussed are The Diptych of Maarten Nieuwenhove, Portrait of a Young Man Before a Landscape and The Donne Altarpiece.
The only other painting that Velázquez is known to use a mirror in is Venus, where it is used an aid (Harris 174). However, the usage of the mirror is used differently, it is only used to create depth for Venus (Harris 174). Las Meninas was not the first painting to “draw the eye inwards and bring the spectator in”(Harris 174). Jan van Eyck’s Marriage Portrait of the Arnolfni, where the mirror reflects the married couple in front, and another person whom is assumed to be the artist, displays those characteristics (Harris 174). People believe that Van Eyck’s painting gave Velázquez this complex idea.
One of the most noteworthy northern European writers of the Renaissance was the Flemish painter, Jan van Eyck. Although there are few records about his early life and rise to prominence, the Van Eyck family was well regarded within the Burgundian Netherlands which allowed historians to surmise that he was born in the 1380s. After years of travelling through various northern courts and gaining esteem, Jan van Eyck painted perhaps his most famous work, The Arnolfini Double Portrait. This work has been the subject of a great deal of critical analysis as a piece of Renaissance art. Some historians have found that the work is demonstrative of artistic and social ideals that were both ahead of its time and touted the line of controversy. However, taking into account the painting’s patronage, symbolism, artistic style, and function, it becomes clear that The Arnolfini Double Portrait is an exemplar of the Renaissance era artistic conventions and is not as difficult to parse as some critics would believe. In order to discuss the painting in its entirety, it is necessary to explore the context of the painting’s creation.
Across Europe, between 1400 and 1650, there were women present in all major styles of time. They worked along side of great artists and were developing new techniques and styles. Women also played a very important role in the Renaissance. Although not as well documented as their male counterparts, women worked along with the other great masters, were just as innovating, and were key in developing new techniques.
Philip, Lotte Brand. The Ghent Altarpiece and the Art of Jan Van Eyck. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton UP, 1971. Print.
The Ghent Altarpiece painted in completeness by Jan and Hubert van Eyck in 1432. This altarpiece is filled with symbolism. One of the most important pieces of the altar is the Deity Enthroned, which represents the Lord in Christianity. The painting covered with symbols and words. The artists portrays many signs with different meanings from the deity’s clothes to the background.
On August 23, 1927, Nicola Sacco and Barolomeo Vanzetti were executed in one of the most controversial legal cases in American history. Two men were shot and robbed in Braintree, MA, and two poor Italian immigrants were arrested for the crime. Although neither Sacco nor Vanzetti had criminal records, they both had pistols on them at the time, and followed a violent anarchist leader. Following their arrest, the seven-year case on the crime would drive national and international protests demanding their exoneration. There were numerous elements in the trial that influenced the guilty verdicts for the men including, but not limited to, weak evidence. The Sacco Vanzetti trial displays the social injustices and prejudice in American society during the time. It is evident that even though they are innocent, the court used Sacco and Vanzetti as scapegoats in this crime because of their beliefs and background.
This painting by Vincent Van Gogh is on display at the Art Institute of Chicago Museum, in the Impressionism exhibit. There are many things going on in this painting that catch the viewer’s eye. The first is the piece’s vibrant colors, light blues and browns, bright greens, and more. The brush strokes that are very visible and can easily be identified as very thick some might even say bold. The furniture, the objects, and the setting are easy to identify and are proportioned to each other. There is so much to see in this piece to attempt to explain in only a few simple sentences.
Johannes Vermeer painted The Art of Painting in the Netherlands. It is an oil on wood painting made in 1673. The painting shows a figure in black sitting down on a four legged object. This figure in black is holding a long object in its right hand. Next to the figure in black is an unfinished painting of an elegant figure in blue. The figure in blue is posing and holding objects in both hands. Inside the room there is a chandelier on top and it is not emitting any light. The floors have black and white tiles like a checkers board. The table in front of the figure in blue has several fabrics on top.
The website stated that, “The painter, etcher, lithographer, illustrator, and sculptor Jean-François Raffaelli was born on April 20, 1850 in Paris. Before Raffaelli dedicated himself to painting under Jean-Léon Gerome (1824 – 1904) in art class, he became an actor.”(Art directory) Back in the days not everybody could afford high class drink like absinthe, Even though they look fairly poor. The painting depicts some absinthe drinkers, men in frock coats and top hats are seated at a table. The upper left of the frame allows a view of the country side with the house clearly seen on top left. When i looked at the two chairs by the side it made me think if they were waiting for someone as they were not shown talking in the painting. He uses techniques to tell that that the house is built on a hill, the factors that tell the viewer is that both of the people sitting in the painting look serious like they are having a serious discussion or they are stressed about
The ability to create a picture of The Annunciation in one’s mind is a key factor in understanding the analysis of the work. Francisco de Zurbaran approaches the painting with a naturalistic style. The painting features a room in which a woman – like angel is seen at the left kneeling on the ground before the Virgin Mary. The figure of Mary is placed between a chair and a small wooden table draped with a green cloth. Mary disregards an open Bible on the table, as she appears solemn while staring at the floor. Floating above the two main figures in the upper left side of the painting are cherubs resting on a bed of clouds. They happily gaze down at Mary with eyes from Heaven.
Magritte, René. Painting: Le Prêtre Marié (The Married Priest). 1961. Available online: http://www.magritte.com/3_detail.cfm?ID=253 , May 9, 2000.
The Renaissance produced a wealth of great skill and craftsmanship. Describe in detail the work of one of its great artists or architects.